When there is money for a big fight what does it mean in the boxing world? There is a clamor for a fight. It means it's a fight that boxing fans wants to see settle an unfinished business. The fact it got dragged and the fans moved away is why it failed. Now since, I don't really know who dragged it whether it was Floyd or Delahoya is not something I'll argue about, since I have no idea who didn't want it.. But I can assume Delahoya wanted a rematch so I guess if someone who would drag it out to lose steam should be Floyd. But don't quote me on this because, I have no prior knowledge of the events that transpired.
That said, I've been explaining to you my point and you seem not to get it for lack of comprehension. If there is clamor, there is money in prize fighting.. And to say that Pac Floyd 2 has no clamor and no money is being naive. Half of the world saw Pac winning, and not to mention a Pacquiao Mayweather rematch is a global event. Not just in our country, thus, there is so much prize fighting money to be made if it was done.
This doesn't mean I want to see a rematch. I will if its made, but this thread is merely to show who has been ducking all these years.. Saying and not doing.. Has been a Floyd motto ever since. When he was young he ducked Cotto Margarito, now that Floyd is past it he has ducked the best welters including Thurman, Crawford, Spence and Pacquiao. That's going to be part of his legacy. How he slithered his way to winning fights as he ducked when he was young.. and to this day. Like I said, to each his own. Everyone has right to quit in his given profession. Hope that's clear enough for you.
Anyway, your argument that the ship has sailed is a false. The fact that Floyd can still Fight Mc Gregor, the Midget in Japan, and now a famous youtuber.. It means he can still fight. And the fact he mentioned he wanted a rematch with Pacquiao and has not done it to this day. Only shows how queer he has become. There's no other explanation to it. There's money, there's legacy in this fight, Floyd can still fight but chose to fight pansies.. It's an obvious duck. It's just the way it is..
To each his own.. He chose to walkwaway fighting legit fights.. That's on him, and I said, that's also where the bucks stops in how his legacy is defined, while in Pac's case his legacy is still being enhanced because he still daring to fight live dogs and challenging himself at the age of almost 43 by the time he fights Spence. I hope that is clear enough for you. You seem to have a hard time understanding.
I repeat it's not Pac who told the world He will rematch Floyd. Floyd told the world he wants a rematch.. And like I said, he chose not to.. Show what character he is a professional boxer. True fighters of the game fight for legacy. Defining legacy by the rivals they had during the course of their career.
Ali had Frazier, Sugar Ray had Marvin Hagler, Pac had, Morales, Marquez, Barrera to name a few of those epic rematches and trilogies.. Floyd sad to say don't have that. It's on him. So hope that's clear enough for you. ;)
Proof Floyd Mayweather Scared of Margarito and Ducking Cotto
https://youtu.be/LRueJoZM8u8
No it's a big fight for you and your support group who want to keep something alive that world moved on from. See your point about he said, she said matters only to you and your homo obsessed fan club. You want someone to do something because others' had something. You mention Leonard as a fighter when Leonard invented the bs Floyd is doing. Let's talk about walking away, as in Floyd beat your idol more soundly than he beat DLH, the fact that it was agreed and signed for after the Hatton fight which Floyd then retired afterwards to avoid spoke volumes. Although Ray Leonard did a similar trick to runaway from Hagler.
Pac has been telling the world he wants a Mayweather fight and was dragging that along for three years before finally understanding it wasn't going to happen. You say true fighters of the game fight for legacy but I didn't see Lennox fight Klitschko, nor did I see Trinidad fight Jones, Hopkins or Wright and didn't see the great Margarito challenge Paul Williams after Williams took his belt. So this fighter fight for legacy is more bs that you only want because Floyd took something from you.
Finally I can care less what Floyd does, my world isn't on pause because some formerly famous fighter is taking a fight with a youtuber. The last Mayweather fight I purchased was against Mosley to which after I saw it was smoke and mirrors. I wanted him to fight Sergio Martinez or Paul Williams seeing as both were bigger and had styles that were different than he saw and unique for their physicality. When he didn't I knew he was fighting fights that he had no real way of losing and the media, fans such as yourself and you fell for it hook, line and sinker. However, I am impressed you were able to incorrectly add comprehension to your vocabulary. I used it as saying you misread me saying he in terms of saying since Pacquiao didn't give DLH a rematch then why should Mayweather, when he of which my post was referring to clearly meant Mayweather. Once I saw that retarded response I understood perfectly anyone who doesn't agree with you is a Floyd fan. Now your only problem is that I'm not and I can care less what he said as I seen him have contract signed and he still chose not to do a rematch.