Malignaggi said nothing controversial. Bring him back

damn you're so tough Yeah I am, especially compared to that complete tool Daggum. Is that your buddy? Good to know.

I lost tons of respect for Paulie over the years. He is just a bitter person now. He has made his entire career about calling out the injustices in boxing but when he was on the right side of a robbery he was happy and didnt say anything. He once said he has tons of evidence against Pacquiao to prove 100% that Pacquiao is a cheater but he wont release the evidence he has. To me it sounds like he let his mouth run off a lil too much and told a lie here and there and the only way to hold on to the lie and not expose yourself is to come up with some nonsense statement like "I wont release any evidence till Pacquaio sues me".

Boxing's best analyst was fired over a big nothing burger. Even boxing has become a woke sport. fuking cringe and embarrassing. another reason why people are flocking to the UFC. - -I say put him up at U place since neither of U can break a pane of glass.

Man I would love to meet you in person, so I can stoop down to the 5'3 inches you probably are, and slap the fu.cking taste out of your worthless mouth damn you're so tough

It wouldn’t be okay for him to say black people are dominant in boxing either. He was responding to Devin Haney’s controversy when he said he wouldn’t lose to a white guy. If it was okay to say that, Devin Haney wouldn’t have a controversy on his hands. If that’s not enough for you, here’s former Air Force football coach Fisher DeBerry being reprimanded 16 years ago for saying black athletes are better than white athletes. He avoided losing his job by apologizing, something Paulie never did. Don’t try to excuse crap behavior with conspiracy theories about cancel culture. People who say one race is better than the other are held responsible, regardless of what race they’re championing. lol this is the dumbest shit. what does a guy 16 years ago saying something good about black people have to do with it? :lol1: the point literally flies straight over your empty head

I find nothing wrong with what he said, but his voice is annoying so he should stay off TV.

Again the topic was attacks on Asians. The accusation was that Asians are MOSTLY getting attacked by black people which has been proven false. Nothing you said here changes that. You're deflecting to other topics because you have nothing to refute what I posted. I know my post triggered because you quoted me three times already lol. Give it up. Your white nationalist agenda won't work with me. Just stop dude. I don't mind you sticking up for your own but at least make some damn sense man. And I quoted you 3 times because you can't MQ anymore and all I do on this site is read through some threads and respond to any comments that stand out.

What didn't you understand from this comment: "Black people are overrepresented by percent of violent crimes perpetuated on Asians coming in at 27.5% while whites are at 24% and that's a fact." Like why are you digging this hole Joe. Not to mention that whites outnumber blacks like 5 to 1 in the US so by those percentages it's not even a comparison between black/white/Asian violence etc Again the topic was attacks on Asians. The accusation was that Asians are MOSTLY getting attacked by black people which has been proven false. Nothing you said here changes that. You're deflecting to other topics because you have nothing to refute what I posted. I know my post triggered because you quoted me three times already lol. Give it up. Your white nationalist agenda won't work with me.

So hate crimes are never violent and just involve name calling? LOL For your sake I hope you're truly not that stupid. The topic was attacks on Asians. Not violent crimes vs hate crimes. Nice deflection attempt on your part. But hey "cool play with words." What didn't you understand from this comment: "Black people are overrepresented by percent of violent crimes perpetuated on Asians coming in at 27.5% while whites are at 24% and that's a fact." Like why are you digging this hole Joe. Not to mention that whites outnumber blacks like 5 to 1 in the US so by those percentages it's not even a comparison between black/white/Asian violence etc

That's a lie. One recent study has provided the justification for the claim that non-whites where the majority of perpetrators of Asian-American hate crimes. The study was published in the American Journal of Criminal Justice in January, and it was based on data from 1992-2014. But the study clearly indicates that the iden****** of the perpetrators of hate crimes against Asian-Americans are overwhelmingly white: 74.6 percent of these crimes are committed by white assailants. Importantly, according to the methodology in the study, there is a ~20-fold difference in the cases of hate crimes reported against African-Americans (5,463) compared to Asian-Americans (329), which explains the large difference in percentage of non-white assailants by race. https://www.newsweek.com/stop-blamin...pinion-1577887 What does a study from 92-14 have to do with the attacks we've all seen on the news over the past year or so, where literally every assailant is black? lol And you call that a recent study. gtfoh Joe

That's not true at all. Alan Minter made the same comments before figuring Marvin Hagler. If didn't affect his career at all. Kovalev called a black person a monkey and used the N word and it didn't even make a dent in the news. Didn't hurt his career either. Malignaggi went as far to say racism and oppression against black people never existed in this century. He also tried to downplay the deaths of George Floyd and Ahmaud Arbery. It wasn't just his comments about African American fighters. But the thread starter is a racist himself so it's not shocking that he didn't have a problem with the comments. Funny how he was offended earlier when someone questioned the customs of Saudi Arabia. Some people like to pick and choose what's offensive based on how it affects them. And some people, like you, are absolutely awful at analyzing any situation that involves race. You can't look at stuff logically, always emotionally. Alan Minter's comments were 40!!!! years ago lol. He immediately tried to backtrack as well, and say he meant 'that black man' instead of what he probably said. Regardless, it was 40 years ago, and he tried to walk it back to make the comment look less incendiary. Kovalev is probably somewhat racist but he played the 'I didn't understand the terminology, I'm Russian' angle, and apologized about the Stevenson/monkey shirt. Never saw any evidence of him using the Nword either. Probably does use but not so publicly. Whereas there is no confusion about what Haney said or meant. It's fine, but comparing it to those situations is low IQ. He didn't even issue any type of apology, and wasn't really forced to lol. Because, what can he really say anyway. He made his point.

well that big tard who said covid is a hoax and got 600 thousand people killed will be back and welcomed with open arms so why cant paulie come back? is there maybe a fox boxing channel he can be on where paulie and some hot blonde women talk about how black and brown people are taking over boxing and how we must stop them Man I would love to meet you in person, so I can stoop down to the 5'3 inches you probably are, and slap the fu.cking taste out of your worthless mouth

What he said was not only ignorant, it was wrong. White man not being offended by ignorant **** another white man said, color me....surprised. That's why I stopped posting here too many bigots, morons and ignoramuses for me to handle daily. So what did you make of Haney's comment, that he was responding to?

Idr wtf he said anymore, but not unlike with Breland & Wilder you can't be on the team if you aren't 100% on board with what the guy paying you is saying you need to be on board with. Don't matter if it makes sense to you or me or anyone else it's the golden rule...the guy with the gold makes the rules. And as a guy who listened to Paulie's old podcast & his new one he's a hardcore Trumptard & it was only a matter of time before he did or said something to get fired. And actually the showtime firing seems to have chilled him out a lot. So if you publicly support Trump, you should be fired? lol

So hate crimes are never violent and just involve name calling? LOL For your sake I hope you're truly not that stupid. The topic was "attacks on Asians" not violent crimes vs hate crimes. Nice deflection attempt on your part. But hey "cool play on words."

Boxing's best analyst was fired over a big nothing burger. Even boxing has become a woke sport. fuking cringe and embarrassing. another reason why people are flocking to the UFC. Nevermind, I forgot that Showtime Championship Boxing broadcasts can easily be live streamed online.

Cool play with words, but "hate crimes" and "violent crimes" aren't always defined as one and the same. IDK about you, but I'd take someone calling me out of my name over getting beat up, or robbed. Black people are overrepresented by percent of violent crimes perpetuated on Asians coming in at 27.5% while whites are at 24% and that's a fact. https://www.bjs.gov/content/pub/pdf/cv18.pdf So hate crimes are never violent and just involve name calling? LOL For your sake I hope you're truly not that stupid. The topic was attacks on Asians. Not violent crimes vs hate crimes. Nice deflection attempt on your part. But hey "cool play with words."

Boxing's best analyst was fired over a big nothing burger. Even boxing has become a woke sport. fuking cringe and embarrassing. another reason why people are flocking to the UFC. I never knew that Showtime was broadcasting in the U.K.

That's a lie. One recent study has provided the justification for the claim that non-whites where the majority of perpetrators of Asian-American hate crimes. The study was published in the American Journal of Criminal Justice in January, and it was based on data from 1992-2014. But the study clearly indicates that the iden****** of the perpetrators of hate crimes against Asian-Americans are overwhelmingly white: 74.6 percent of these crimes are committed by white assailants. Importantly, according to the methodology in the study, there is a ~20-fold difference in the cases of hate crimes reported against African-Americans (5,463) compared to Asian-Americans (329), which explains the large difference in percentage of non-white assailants by race. https://www.newsweek.com/stop-blamin...pinion-1577887 Cool play with words, but "hate crimes" and "violent crimes" aren't always defined as one and the same. IDK about you, but I'd take someone calling me out of my name over getting beat up, or robbed. Black people are overrepresented by percent of violent crimes perpetuated on Asians coming in at 27.5% while whites are at 24% and that's a fact. https://www.bjs.gov/content/pub/pdf/cv18.pdf

attacks on asian Americans, mostly committed by African Americans white supremacy though lol. That's a lie. One recent study has provided the justification for the claim that non-whites where the majority of perpetrators of Asian-American hate crimes. The study was published in the American Journal of Criminal Justice in January, and it was based on data from 1992-2014. But the study clearly indicates that the identities of the perpetrators of hate crimes against Asian-Americans are overwhelmingly white: 74.6 percent of these crimes are committed by white assailants. Importantly, according to the methodology in the study, there is a ~20-fold difference in the cases of hate crimes reported against African-Americans (5,463) compared to Asian-Americans (329), which explains the large difference in percentage of non-white assailants by race. https://www.newsweek.com/stop-blaming-black-people-anti-asian-hate-opinion-1577887