Yes, absolutely. I'd say I've probably doubled up on my support for him in light of all the network, media and casual fan backlash he's received post-Agbeko. If you actually know what the hell you're looking at, then it's very aesthetically pleasing and easy to watch. I say that as a big fan of aggressive, come forward fighters as well. Abner is actually my boy, even despite KO1 and the fact he'd probably stand no chance against Rigondeaux.
He's very clearly an all-time talent and one of the most skilled fighters on the planet, though few ever seem to laud him on what exactly makes him 'skilled' -- I'd say an utter mastery of range, distance and footwork (which entails numerous different 'skills' in itself) followed closely by impeccable technique, counter-punching ability, accuracy and timing. On top that he has natural power, incredible speed of both hand/foot and exceptional reflexes. Very much an 'Amplified Technician' as I like to call him on CHB. He absolutely bosses fights without need for the jab as anything other than a rangefinder which - as it's already been mentioned - is why his overall accuracy reads so low, Lampley and Co. He lands over 40% of his power shots. Fighting on the inside is something he almost looks to very consciously avoid. His style is somewhat one-dimensional, particularly compared to someone like Mayweather who's much more versatile and has shown more offensive variation throughout his career, but he's so good at implementing it and excels so much at his strengths that it doesn't even matter.
His version of 'box-and-move' is a very entertaining one IMO because it's far less dependent on jabs and committed to power shots. His version of 'hit-and-dont get hit' is in it's purest form and literal, not 'hit-and-jump into the clinch thereby not getting hit'. He's certainly good at giving the illusion that he's there to be hit a lot of times and really doesn't waste movement for movement's sake, but once he's gauged the distance and found the range to land his straight left, you aren't getting any closer - his power usually thwarts forward momentum on it's own, but that footwork is what really sets him apart. He can be incredibly fleet footed and explosive with his legs but that isn't even the half: From a technical standpoint, his balance, positioning, timing to get off blistering shots while moving in and out of range, ability to create space and keep from being cornered or put against the ropes, pivot and change directions.. it's cartoonishly good. His footwork is ****ing impossible for today's level of opposition, he doesn't even need to resort to clinches as a means of neutralizing an opponent's offensive attack, most of them aren't even up for letting their hands go FFS.
So yeah, he's good. Really, really good - and very much worth supporting and watching. He's been dominating boxing at various levels for well over a decade now, that isn't going to change any time soon and there's reason(s) for that.