Berlanga is just happy he went 12 :rofl::rofl:, don't blame the kid crazy his first title fight was against an ATG of this generation ..
I think this was a great experience for Berlanga.
He is not agressive enough and he will never be. He is more worried about not getting hit, which although not a bad thing, it is perceived as boring by many! He is a master technician, not an offensive, entertaining machine.
What the hell. How does this make any sense? That's a nice signing by Eddie to even get Matias, why would he want to ruin a potential future star?
That's exactly how I feel but it came from Matias himself. It sounds very weird to me.
Fury, Joshua, and Parker.
I don't know what crack these fools smoke to say things like "Usyk beat Joshua twice so he's proven"
You know anyone who only has a record of 5-0? Unproven, mother ****er. We've seen him do well against three styles. Proven, solid, great HW :rolleyes:
I'm favoring Usyk against Fury and all, but let's be real, anyone doing that is going out on a limb for the relatively unknown HW against the well known and well proven HW we've seen fight and adapt to all sorts of HW styles.
Usyk needs more HW fights to be proven.
Had Franny beaten Tyson, guess what, he'd still be fairly well unknown and unproven. A good win proves you beat that one good fighter ... ffs.
Dr. Z Sometimes you're just a ****ing moron. This isn't a difference of opinion, ain't no fact gonna save you, you're a ****ing moron. 5 fights = Proven doe :dunce: Moron.
Oh the irony!