Because you're probably one of those people wanting to make a testicle sandwhich with Pacquiao's nuts....stop defending the cheat. War Malignaggi!!!
LOL, ok then, whatever tickles your bone. I'm just stating, you're starting to sound pathetic.
Only for the dimwitted, Pactards easily fit the bill.
Dude, I swear to God. Did a pactard rape you, killed your dog, or something? Everytime you post it's either pactards this, pactards that. But I do agree with the first part of what you said though. If a boxing fan said that, I would scratch my head, but if an average Joe, I wouldn't. Sometimes, boxing is a popularity contest man.
Floyd has one disputed win and he jumps right back in the ring and fights the guy and beats him easy.
Manny gets knocked out and never avenges that lost. Gets knocked out again does not avenge that lost. Has a draw with Agapito Sanchez, never fights him again. Draws with Marquez fights him four years later wins a controversial decision (I thought he won it) then avoids him like the plague. He lost to Erik Morales and I have to give him credit for signing to rematch him. Morales losing to Raheem was not his fault.
But people talk about this warrior attitude and in the ring he does fight hard and does have a lot of heart (that's why I love seeing him fight and he is one of my favorites). But isn't it a little curious that this warrior seems a bit reluctant to correct his missteps in the ring? And is the aforementioned Floyd supposed to be the scared one but yet he wasnt afraid to jump right back into the ring with the only man who possibly beat him?
Please share thoughts and please refrain from the Flomo/Pactard nonsense. I'm asking a question.
I believe his two KO's were because of weight drain. Immediately after those fights he came up in weight even jumping two divisions in one. The Marquez rematch didn't materialize earlier because as we all now know, Marquez has a pretty bad Manager in Don Nacho. He had a chance of fighting Pac again for the 3rd time, but he thinks he's the A side. He had a chance of KOing Khan, but he feels he's being used. So there you go.
In Floyd vs Clottey, if floyd wants to connect, he's going to need to go nearer to Clottey as obviously straight hands would not be that effective. The hooks would be the key to land punches on clottey's shell defense thus bringing his body nearer to clottey so he could pile up points. Now if floyd slows down overnight then clottey would probably have a greater chance in connecting when floyd's body is nearer to his. The question is would floyd risk that? But if this happens I believe it could be another shutout in favor of floyd. I honestly don't know. Would it be a better fight? Who knows, pac and floyd has different styles, but the important thing is they get the job done.
So that wasn't blood in the canvas the other night? I'm pretty sure I saw some red-brown fluid splattered during the barrage of body punches pac threw.
Margarito-8 million JMM-15 million
:thinking:
But didn't Mayweather fight Baldomir for 8 million too after refusing Margarito's offer of the same amount?
I wonder what will be people excuses when Mayweather vs. Shane Mosley outsells all of Pacquiao's PPV!!!
All pacquiao's PPV combined is at least 4 million. I don't think May vs Shane would do more than 4 mil. If you're talking about the highest pac got, which is 1.4? in the Dela Hoya fight, didn't May vs Dela Hoya already did more than 2 mil? So this bet is completely pointless.
No he don't. Why? Picture this.
One year after the game is released, there will be a class action suit worth millions of dollars because apparently Floyd's game definitely causes De Quervain's even if you try to avoid it and go ergonomic and shit. Apparently, players are forced to fight a 12-round fight every set thus causing strain on both thumbs.
The most amazing thing is how people say he beat great fighters and Floyd hasn't. They both beat the same guys so go figure. The most amazing thing about Pac is how he won fighter of the decade when I saw Morrales beat his ass and May didn't lose a fight so go figure. What is also amazing is how he weight drain fighters and still get credit for the wins. He ducked Mayweather because he didn't want to be blood tested. He ducked foreman because he is too tall. He ducked a third marquez fight. He ducked mosley because as roach would say (he is too good). He won't take blood test because Floyd is bigger than him lol. Amazing
The most amazing thing is how people say Pacquiao is on the juice without solid proof and then the same posters/trolls continue to berate his ass by saying that he beat old, weight drained, washed up, talentless fighters (but before the fight they are either going to whoop his ass or has equal skills) who apparently are within top 10 of their division when he fought them. So what is it, juice or overrated? I assume its either stupidity or just pure hate.
Because he's like Mayweather with losses.
1. Big ego.
2. Big mouth.
Honest to God, if and when Mayweather losses, brace yourselves for Malignaggi version 2.0
If Paulie doesn't have losses, he'll probably be saying he's the greatest fighter who ever lived too and everybody else only cheat.
Facial expressions give good scope for laughs.
http://image3.examiner.com/images/blog/EXID5699/images/th_1267977256_freddie_and_manny_birthday.jpg
Manny: I wonder what kind of thread boxingscene posters will come up with our picture this time Coach?
Roach: The usual, something moronic or stupid. LOL.
the only chance floyd has vs packy is to run and potshot , hope for a decision , thats it .....i think he would do eaxactly that and would'nt be enough , pac wins without a single scratch.........
If ever pac and floyd fought, pac would look like what he looked after the Clottey fight with them bruises and shit, but would still win based on activity. As I said before, floyd will throw like 8 out of 10 while Pac will throw 20 out of 100. Pac could beat floyd the way he beat clottey and that's by shear volume of punches and activity especially since floyd's philly shell defense is not that effective against a southpaw thus probably even more connect percentage for the pacman.
In short, floyd could have an 80% connect percentage and pac 20%, but if Pac throws an average of 100 per round to floyd's 10 or 20, no way the judges would give the fight to floyd. That's why I could see a SD win for Pac. If dela hoya almost got a SD with the way he fought Floyd and not really being that effective, what do you think a now household name, good guy persona pacquiao, who would actually connect do? Those judges would be persuaded easily. You could quote me on this.
Fck it, Sugar Shane, I know you're a great dude and an excellent welterweight and all, but Pauli Malignaggi is the greatest welterweight of all time, of all time.
If Mayweather didn't want the fight he wouldn't have offered the 14 day cut off.
Mayweather did want to fight Pac because of the money involved, but he obviously is scared of Pac, looking like a monster in his four previous outings, hence the extra drug testing. He couldn't believe that the pacman was able to do what he did and he's afraid that if he is on something that he'll(floyd) end up the same. If he's not afraid and truly believes in his skills, then PEDs or no PEDs, he would've fought him even without a single test.
Am I the only one who thinks this is a load of crap? Not hating here. Just saying, I challenge you to take in 7000 calories a day, it is almost impossible trust me, then combine that with working out like a beast.
And statements like this is the reason why we sit in front of the computer rather than being the #1 P4P in the world. Besides, almost impossible means it's still possible. Maybe not for you, me, or any other nitwits in this forum, but for special people like, oh let me see, the best fighter in the world, it can be done and IS being done.
How sad is it that Paqcuiao has to work so hard just to get to the level he's at, which is mediocre.
Floyd could work much less hard and he'd still be the superior fighter because of his superior physical and mental talent.
How sad it is for fanboys of a particular fighter to not see other great fighters besides the object of their affection and trying to elevate their fighter more by trying to convince other true fans that other great fighters are only at that level because they are talentless cheating freaks.
Just finished watching a clip of Dave Tate from eliteFTS which, for those you who don't know, has been a powerlifter since his early teens and trained with the likes of Louie Simmons at Westside Barbell. Suffice to say he knows a thing or two not only about strength but also the effects of steriods on lifters, although I do not believe he himself has ever used (not that he looks down on it, he's neither for or against).
I'm paraphrasing here but an interesting observation he made about anabolic steriod use is that users have a hard time just walking around without being out of breath quickly. Why? Because anabolic steriods users fire their muscles more all the time - even under the most minimal load. Their muscles over compensate everything. Which is PERFECT if you have to do a short duration (less than 10 seconds), heavy load, explosive lift.
Anabolic users also train for much shorter periods of time with heavier loads compared to natural lifters because that's the only way they'll get any benefit. There's no benefit in submaximal loading and thus large amounts of time training. Their bodies are not capable of anything else because they've sacrificed any meaningful endurance for pure phosphogenic (and maybe a bit of anaerobic) strength.
So, if the above observations are an accurate representation of the effects and usefulness of anabolic steroid use, I've got 2 questions :
1) How are anabolic steroids useful to a boxer?
2) Given Paquiao's tremendous speed strength and endurance based work load, how can anyone point at him and say "steroid use"?
If anyone has any counter information on this, if this info is off base in anyway - post it here. I certainly do not claim to be an authority on the subject of anabolic steroids however this was an interesting and informed opinion I came across recently and thought it might be worth sharing.
The video in question can be found here
h**p://journal.crossfit.com/2009/06/dave-tate-sticking-points-technique-part-2.tpl
however it does require paid registration to grab.
Pac ain't on steroids according to SR. and uncle Roger. He's on A-side-meth whatever the hell that is. It makes bullets bounce off your body or something like that shit. They've got proof ------------> wikipedia.
Now thats what I'm talking about. He's a true champion unlike Manny Pacquiao. That's how you prove your clean, not by sueing someone.
"cease and desist" sounds like a term a lawyer would use in this kind of situation.
I've said MANY times that the Klits are TOO BIG, im not sure if you guys are being foreal or if your using sarcasm, but there is nothing wrong with a WW the supposed greatest fighter of all time moving up to MW.
It has been done numerous of times before.
106 to 147 hasn't been done before but the Pacman did it. I would have said 150 but Pac weighed 145 in that match. I'm not sure about this, but has Pac even weighed exactly at the 147 mark before? So your logic that "it has been done numerous of times before" is nil when your talking about Pacquiao moving up in weight AGAIN. You should know that.