Prime JAMES TONEY Vs Usyk @ 200lbs

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • IronDanHamza
    BoxingScene Icon
    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
    • Oct 2009
    • 49568
    • 5,042
    • 270
    • 104,043

    #141
    Originally posted by Long jabber
    usyk is a basic boxer puncher with good footwork. toney would destroy him. usyk would get KOd by a prime sam peter
    Not really.

    Less skilled, worse boxers than Usyk boxed rings around Toney.

    Anyone with the movement and skill of Usyk would badly trouble Toney, especially a cruiserweight.

    Once again, Toney never destroyed an elite fighter in his entire career and it certainly isn't starting with Usyk.

    You live in a dream world where reality doesn't exist

    Comment

    • Nay_Sayer
      Banned
      Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
      • Nov 2011
      • 3837
      • 182
      • 1
      • 49,922

      #142
      Originally posted by bojangles1987
      I'm doubting you've even seen Toney fight Tiberi or Johnson or any of these guys, tbh.
      Fair enough. I'll go back and watch both fights then come here and post my scorecards. I should have time in the next day or so...

      Comment

      • BoloShot
        Undisputed Champion
        Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
        • May 2019
        • 2786
        • 119
        • 391
        • 56,635

        #143
        Originally posted by Nay_Sayer
        I have no problem giving any fighter his just due, regardless of his race.

        Tyson Fury is the rightful, legitimate HW champion and #1 HW in the world. Period. End of story - and I'm not entertaining any foolishness to the contrary. No glovegate, no PED nonsense, nothing.

        That said, I'm not going to pretend as if race isn't a factor in how certain fighters are promoted. Case in point, Lomachenko was considered P4P #1 over both Andre Ward and Terrence Crawford. Utter nonsense and proof that race in boxing is still an issue...
        Loma wasn't p4p No. 1 over Ward. He was p4p #1 after Ward and all those guys that Usyk beat at cruiser are considered to be very good fighters at the least. Guys like Huck, Glowacki and Briedis being elite in the division. Usyk did a very good job on them in their backyards which I find to be a pretty impressive feat.

        Comment

        • BoloShot
          Undisputed Champion
          Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
          • May 2019
          • 2786
          • 119
          • 391
          • 56,635

          #144
          Originally posted by bojangles1987
          It's the weird circular logic people have with Toney. Jirov must be good because Toney is the ultimate fantasy fighter and only someone great could possibly make for such a great fight with a great fighter like James Toney.

          Except for all those C level fighters who arguably beat him.
          It was an entertaining fight with a slightly past it Burger King filled James Toney having it put on him by the ever basic but bruising style of Jirov before the dramatic finish. A memorable and quality fight but a battle of elite talents? No. You're right people get ****** into his good the fight was and forget the level of fighter Jirov was.

          Comment

          • Nay_Sayer
            Banned
            Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
            • Nov 2011
            • 3837
            • 182
            • 1
            • 49,922

            #145
            Originally posted by BoloShot
            Loma wasn't p4p No. 1 over Ward. He was p4p #1 after Ward
            In no way, shape or form does Lomachenko - with his LOSS to a journeyman - have or had a better resume than Canelo Alvarez or Terrance Crawford. It did not and it does not exist...

            Comment

            • Long jabber
              Contender
              Silver Champion - 100-500 posts
              • Apr 2014
              • 306
              • 17
              • 2
              • 13,051

              #146
              Originally posted by IronDanHamza
              Not really.

              Less skilled, worse boxers than Usyk boxed rings around Toney.

              Anyone with the movement and skill of Usyk would badly trouble Toney, especially a cruiserweight.

              Once again, Toney never destroyed an elite fighter in his entire career and it certainly isn't starting with Usyk.

              You live in a dream world where reality doesn't exist
              Usyk is basic dude. Lol @ ur delusion of thinking a basuc boxer puncher with **** work rate aand an average punch beats an atg known for his iron chin in toney. He cant do anything defence and counterpunching is wayyy too freaking good for a basic fighter like usyk to do anything. Let usyk grab a title at hw like toney did before you start comparing basic usyk to atg james toney

              Comment

              • BoloShot
                Undisputed Champion
                Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                • May 2019
                • 2786
                • 119
                • 391
                • 56,635

                #147
                Originally posted by Nay_Sayer
                In no way, shape or form does Lomachenko - with his LOSS to a journeyman - have or had a better resume than Canelo Alvarez or Terrance Crawford. It did not and it does not exist...
                If Salido is a journeyman then so is Emile Griffith. It was his second pro fight I mean cmon now stop using the same old stick to bash him with, you ever get tired of flogging a dead horse? Crawford is very lacking in the resumé department as skilled as he is. I don't even think Loma was p4p #1 based on his resumé ever. I'm just stating what his ranking was at the time.

                Comment

                • Long jabber
                  Contender
                  Silver Champion - 100-500 posts
                  • Apr 2014
                  • 306
                  • 17
                  • 2
                  • 13,051

                  #148
                  Loma is definitely above crawford. His win over rigo and the way he beat him is leagues above anything crawford has done

                  Comment

                  • Nay_Sayer
                    Banned
                    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                    • Nov 2011
                    • 3837
                    • 182
                    • 1
                    • 49,922

                    #149
                    Originally posted by BoloShot
                    If Salido is a journeyman then so is Emile Griffith.
                    Lol. If you say so but we'll save that debate for another time. Fact remains, Lomachenko LOST.


                    Originally posted by BoloShot
                    It was his second pro fight
                    Nonsense. It wasn't his second pro fight, it was his seventh.


                    Originally posted by BoloShot
                    I mean cmon now stop using the same old stick to bash him with, you ever get tired of flogging a dead horse?
                    Actually no. It's the sadist in me. Lol..


                    Originally posted by BoloShot
                    Crawford is very lacking in the resumé department as skilled as he is.
                    Ok, no argument from me. But you know what Crawford's resume is also lacking which Lomachenko's isn't? A loss...


                    Originally posted by BoloShot
                    I don't even think Loma was p4p #1 based on his resumé ever. I'm just stating what his ranking was at the time.
                    And my point is that Lomachenko's ranking as P4P #1 was never warranted. Not then and certainly not now...

                    Comment

                    • Nay_Sayer
                      Banned
                      Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                      • Nov 2011
                      • 3837
                      • 182
                      • 1
                      • 49,922

                      #150
                      Originally posted by Long jabber
                      Loma is definitely above crawford. His win over rigo and the way he beat him is leagues above anything crawford has done
                      Lomachenko Rigo was @ 130lbs - where Rigo has done nothing. Nor had he did anything @ 126lbs. Beating Rigo @ 130 is essentially meaningless. Plus, losses COUNT. Unlike Lomachenko, Crawford lacks a loss to a journeyman on his resume. There is nothing particularly impressive about beating a guy who's coming up not one but TWO weight classes.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP