The entire point is did he intentionally used nandrolone, which is cheating or his natural nandrolone was raised because of wild boar. It is absurd if I have to explain the difference between cheating and unknowingly raising your levels when it comes to a similar situation.
I don't intend to argue over it. Micro-dosing doesn't lead to adverse results. Masking it with another substance will make you test positive for the substance at least but sometimes it doesn't fully cover the drug, so you test positive for both.
My personal view of who gets caught and who doesn't is more likely corruption: if an agency wants to be sure you are clean, it is a matter of frequency of urine and blood testing. Those same agencies can cover your *ss also.
"Just because someone didn't test positive for a fight doesn't prove anything in regards to potential PED use" is a dangerous narrative - you just approved to throw su****ions over everybody, as Atypicalbrit does with Usyk.
Ok, fair - it is an opinion and I am fine with that. You and the crimson guy see the below person as a regular PEDs user, but crimson, with all his intelligence, also sees Francis as a clean guy. I have my opinion on that, but will leave the "FACT" he does to speak for itself. Only a man of his capabilities can say "he was never cleared" - of course, nobody can make the nandrolone magically disappear, the point is UKADA concluded that Fury "have never knowingly or deliberately committed any anti-doping rule violation." Which is the most the agency can do to "clear" him.
eec7a31c229c8620bee96d66249b6782.jpg
But I have to say that a person who doesn't get the story and why I mention the Klitschko fight can only continuously talk nonsense because that is the best he is capable of - I repeat: I explained how long nandrolone stays in your system, when Fury tested clean before and after the fight and when he didn't. Well, crimson is unable to sum 1+1. How fast nandrolone cleans out of your system when the intake is because of meat differs from when using it as a PED. This actually raises a different talk: if food can elevate your nandrolone, testosterone or whatever - is it cheating if you can prove it? It isn't a synthetic drug, it's food.
But let's simplify it for "simple" people because the nerves of crimson can't take it when there is a deeper look into the situation: Fury once tested positive for nandrolone. Did he recently test so - no. So why is that thread?
I made my point clear. I am leaving the incapable to struggle with it, he will at least get some relief by doing it.
I don't intend to argue over it. Micro-dosing doesn't lead to adverse results. Masking it with another substance will make you test positive for the substance at least but sometimes it doesn't fully cover the drug, so you test positive for both.
My personal view of who gets caught and who doesn't is more likely corruption: if an agency wants to be sure you are clean, it is a matter of frequency of urine and blood testing. Those same agencies can cover your *ss also.
"Just because someone didn't test positive for a fight doesn't prove anything in regards to potential PED use" is a dangerous narrative - you just approved to throw su****ions over everybody, as Atypicalbrit does with Usyk.
Ok, fair - it is an opinion and I am fine with that. You and the crimson guy see the below person as a regular PEDs user, but crimson, with all his intelligence, also sees Francis as a clean guy. I have my opinion on that, but will leave the "FACT" he does to speak for itself. Only a man of his capabilities can say "he was never cleared" - of course, nobody can make the nandrolone magically disappear, the point is UKADA concluded that Fury "have never knowingly or deliberately committed any anti-doping rule violation." Which is the most the agency can do to "clear" him.
eec7a31c229c8620bee96d66249b6782.jpg
But I have to say that a person who doesn't get the story and why I mention the Klitschko fight can only continuously talk nonsense because that is the best he is capable of - I repeat: I explained how long nandrolone stays in your system, when Fury tested clean before and after the fight and when he didn't. Well, crimson is unable to sum 1+1. How fast nandrolone cleans out of your system when the intake is because of meat differs from when using it as a PED. This actually raises a different talk: if food can elevate your nandrolone, testosterone or whatever - is it cheating if you can prove it? It isn't a synthetic drug, it's food.
But let's simplify it for "simple" people because the nerves of crimson can't take it when there is a deeper look into the situation: Fury once tested positive for nandrolone. Did he recently test so - no. So why is that thread?
I made my point clear. I am leaving the incapable to struggle with it, he will at least get some relief by doing it.
Comment