Originally posted by IronDanHamza
View Post
I talked about the Klitschko fight because keep in mind nandrolone can be detected in a man's urine up to 8 months and up to 18 in a man's blood. It is hard to mask, surely you are not micro-dosing it if you give adverse results. So Fury tested positive in February 2015 - what is weird is that he had two fights in 2014 and one of them was in November 2014 - was he tested in 2014 or not? Because if so, traces of nandrolone would have been found. Is he that reckless to risk his title fight against Wladimir - probably he is because he did many things to destroy a potentially great career. Because he was tested prior and after that fight.
That's all, the nandrolone case is weird. It's not defence, as I said - I don't think there is any top-level athlete who doesn't use PEDs. My initial point was let's not accuse him of something he didn't do. Some people have their reasons to dislike him, others to like him but polluting the forums with constant Fury-hating topics became infantile for the last 2-3 years. Especially after his last fight - who do you think looks more like a steroids abuser - Fury or Ngannou?
Comment