Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

How many roid cycles has Fury done since the Ngannou fight?

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • You do not have permission to view this gallery.
    This gallery has 1 photos.

    Comment


    • Such little bitches in here .

      Comment


      • Originally posted by RJJ-94-02=GOAT View Post

        Supposition or common sense?

        It’s beyond obvious, if you do your research.
        Your a punk azz biatch . Lol

        Comment


        • Originally posted by Known user
          The half life of the drug itself can be manipulated by masking agents, mirco dosing
          Originally posted by Known user
          Microdosing absolutely can lead to to adverse results.


          Originally posted by Known user
          ... if they havent tested positive then we have no data to suspect them.
          Originally posted by Known user
          Most athletes are using something, that goes without saying.
          Originally posted by Known user
          Contradiction where?
          Last edited by N/A; 04-16-2024, 02:38 AM.

          Comment


          • Originally posted by juggernaut666 View Post
            Your a punk azz biatch . Lol
            You’re a sad, lonely, old man fantasising about being a tough guy on the internet.

            Comment


            • Originally posted by fifth_root View Post





              I don’t understand where you’re lost on this?

              If someone hasn’t failed drug test, we can’t assume they’re taking something to the extent we can with someone that has. Like Fury, for example.

              That doesn’t change the fact that in my OPINION, most athletes are using PEDs. But until they have the drugs in their system then we will never know for sure unlike others that have, like Fury.

              What aren’t you understanding and where is the contraction? I’m as consistent on this as you could get in this.
              Last edited by IronDanHamza; 04-15-2024, 02:12 AM.

              Comment


              • Originally posted by IronDanHamza View Post

                I don’t understand where you’re lost on this?

                If someone hasn’t failed drug test, we can’t assume they’re taking something to the extent we can with someone that has. Like Fury, for example.

                That doesn’t change the fact that in my OPINION, most athletes are using PEDs. But until they have the drugs in their system then we will never know for sure unlike others that have, like Fury.

                What aren’t you understanding and where is the contraction? I’m as consistent on this as you could get.
                How often do you see someone on the internet say "Right, I see your point now, thank you for explaining"? It's very rare, people tend to just protract the argument until someone gives up. It's a fascinating phenomenon and why I'm sceptical about how much of a blessing the internet has been for public communication.

                Comment


                • Originally posted by dan-b View Post

                  How often do you see someone on the internet say "Right, I see your point now, thank you for explaining"? It's very rare, people tend to just protract the argument until someone gives up. It's a fascinating phenomenon and why I'm sceptical about how much of a blessing the internet has been for public communication.
                  Do you often hear that phrase when people are talking/arguing over something face to face?

                  It is the nature of internet discussions: User A talks/argues with User B, but then User C replies to User... you chose which one, it doesn't matter, aggressively, not polite or whatever. Like he was personally insulted by something. How often does that happen when two people are talking to each other? Also lacking the non-verbal aspect of communication is crucial but this is an entire thread. In any way, I doubt anyone's life got harmed because of internet communication, unless he doesn't have mental or emotional issues anyway (no mock in saying it).
                  dan-b dan-b likes this.

                  Comment


                  • Originally posted by fifth_root View Post

                    Do you often hear that phrase when people are talking/arguing over something face to face?

                    It is the nature of internet discussions: User A talks/argues with User B, but then User C replies to User... you chose which one, it doesn't matter, aggressively, not polite or whatever. Like he was personally insulted by something. How often does that happen when two people are talking to each other? Also lacking the non-verbal aspect of communication is crucial but this is an entire thread. In any way, I doubt anyone's life got harmed because of internet communication, unless he doesn't have mental or emotional issues anyway (no mock in saying it).
                    That's not my concern. If someone responds angrily to an abstract opinion by throwing personal insults then it's pretty obvious they have maturity and emotional issues and can be dismissed accordingly.

                    My concern is the structural misunderstanding in internet communication. Often the misunderstanding/misreading (wilful or otherwise) comes early in the exchange and is never relinquished. The person arguing argues against a point they wish the person had made for the sake of their polemic rather than the actual point made.

                    Given how much communication happens online now, this is surely not a trivial matter.

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    X
                    TOP