Tweet
Yeah, Louis just destroys Tunney. C'mon man.
-
-
it's also important to note that Schmeling was a 3-1 underdog and Louis was on a long string of victories. He self admittedy underestimated Schmeling and I believe him based on 2 reasons:
1: he iced him in the rematch - one sidedly
2: he was beating Schmeling handily early on - and Schmeling almost feigned like he was fading - then out of nowhere landed a howitzer on Louis jaw. He landed flush and Louis could never recover. It was this just as much as his Cross over the jab counter he always brings up. Louis totally underestimated him.
Tunney is good enough to beat Louis - but if I had to bet prime for prime for all the Marbles I edge Louis to get Tunney. Louis jab is too good Tunney would lose a decision I believe.Last edited by them_apples; 01-07-2025, 11:35 AM.Comment
-
yet but tons didn't fight on the big stage for the world to see. The stage was small back then and Jack Johnson left a sour taste in everyones mouth. just read biographies on these guys - some of them were totally not racist - it would be a travesty to call them a racist beyond the grave when they cannot defend themselves.Comment
-
-
Louis fought two black men of his 26 title defenses. Just two. One was could not see well. The other was robbed once of victory, and well in the lead in the other fight until he was the victim of a come from behind KO.Originally posted by Bronson66 View Post
You know he wasn't ducking blacks?Last edited by Dr Z; 01-08-2025, 06:42 AM.Comment
-
No, it's justice. Upholding the system while claiming no personal responsibility has been the calling card of the racist since the day they lost their race war.
Andrew Jackson claimed he never agreed with slavery he only did it because he thought that's what God wanted. Not a racist? Just a Christian man in a time when he could be confused? Tell that to the black men he whipped, the children he sent away, and the women he ****d. Calling Card since they lost the civil war.
They're not racist champions they just simply are from a racist time? Tell that to the black men barred from greatness for a hundred years.
Seems like no matter how the message is delivered people will avoid the truth simply because the transitive factor means some hero of yours takes some level of legacy hit.
The KKK always wore hoods and always hide their identity from a public that was so racist the champion had to hide his egalitarian beliefs? That makes sense to you?
Every slave owner ever could claim they're not racist they're just part of a society.
Only the men who actually lived an egalitarian life should be afforded that honor. Every man too much of a pus sy to stand up to the system is guilty of being too much of a pus sy to stand up to the system. This includes our favorite champions pre-colorline and there is nothing anyone can do about it.
Benjamin Lay exists about 200 years prior to any man mentioned in this thread. He wasn't a hard man, he wasn't a tough guy, he was a dwarf with all the illness that comes with dwarfism in the early 18th century. He was not too much of a pus sy to accost slave owners, wife beaters, or animal abusers. But big badass Dempsey can't be held to wee little Benjamin's standard though?
Hard no brah. It'll be me reminding you these ****s were racists.Comment
-
An extremely agile man,Louis?
Well the boxing press of the time called him the Shuffling Joe for a reason. Why? Please explain this to me? A no reply to this question speaks volumes.
When matched vs. guys who had decent to great feet and a decent to great jab, Louis' shuffling feet struggled to catch up and was down on the collective scorecards on Schmeling, Conn, Charles ( okay Louis was 36 here but active ) and Walcott despite having an advantage in size.
Hmmm...
Shuffilin' Joe I saw was gift wrapped a win on the score cards vs Wallcot, and would have LOST at least one fight to these men on the modern 10 point must score system for 12 rounds!
Hmmm ....
And Louis did not fight any swarming types. Did he fight any Southpaws? Nope. And Eastern Europeans fighters which have been as a group on top of the heavyweight division for the past 20 years? No again.
Hmmm ..
But he sure for a lot of bum of the month types!
So there you have it.
Comment
-
Louis still active? he had been retired for 2 years and 3 months!
Louis fought 7 men who held the heavyweight title.
He fought
Schmeling no2
Carnera no2
Retzlaff no 4
Ramage no 10
Ramage no10
Mann no 3
Levinsky no 5
Braddock Champ
Farr no2
Burman no 3
Godoy no 2
Galento no4
Lewis Lhvy Champ
Simon no4
Simon no 5
B Baer no7
B Baer no7
Conn no1 & Lhvy Champ
Conn no1
Nova no 6
Mauriello no2
Walcott no3
Walcott no1
Charles Champ
Brion no 7
Savold no 2
Marciano no 10
Name another Champion who fought more champions and ranked contenders?
Haters got to hate!
Last edited by Bronson66; 01-08-2025, 01:09 PM.Comment
-
But we have hashed this out already.
You can't really find black opponents who can claim they were grossly overlooked, or ducked by Louis.
Louis had five White HW Champions to KO, he did (5-1) in six fights. My God, what's a 'color boy to do.'
The money backers where not big on black-black fights, the color line still dominated the South and West. Even with Louis's rise in 1933, was still hard in the 1930s.
Before the Louis-Baer fight, the announcer lectured the audience on racism, for a solid five minutes. Lots of 'may the best man win' and 'clean sport' pleases! were shoveled at the audience.
Unnecessarily I might add. You can hear on the radio broadcast that the audience was all in. But the week's leadup to the fight, in the newspapers, had not been.
If it was racism it was systemic; it showed at the gate more than in the public eye.
It was Louis following the money.Comment
Comment