Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
What evidence do we have that heavyweights were too small in the past to compete today? and what determines a fighters size?
Collapse
-
Originally posted by fifth_root View Post
It's just an assumption. Percentagewise there could be bad facts about them.
You can describe her as a crossdresser at best.
Gender appears to be likewise ambiguous in Sand's own perspective. Sometimes when writing first person memoirs or essays (including letters and journals), Sand's language "speaks to modern explorations of gender ambiguity" in the consistent use of a first-person "male persona" used to describe Sand's own experiences and identity in masculine terms. However, when writing an autobiography of the author's youth, the person described is a girl/woman whose descriptions aligns with her legal designation as "la demoiselle Aurora."
Comment
-
Originally posted by Willie Pep 229 View Post
Victor Hugo commented, "George Sand cannot determine whether she is male or female. I entertain a high regard for all my colleagues, but it is not my place to decide whether she is my sister or my brother.
Gender appears to be likewise ambiguous in Sand's own perspective. Sometimes when writing first person memoirs or essays (including letters and journals), Sand's language "speaks to modern explorations of gender ambiguity" in the consistent use of a first-person "male persona" used to describe Sand's own experiences and identity in masculine terms. However, when writing an autobiography of the author's youth, the person described is a girl/woman whose descriptions aligns with her legal designation as "la demoiselle Aurora.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Ivich View PostI didnt say they contributed because they were Gay, but if you delete the Gays contributions to computers [Turing],the Arts,such as Music.Poetry,:Literature,Cinema.Theatre,Sculpture, Dance, Inventions,the world would be a poorer place.
I'd take a bet that percentage wise Gays have contributed more to culture than straight people.
No one is obliged to like Gays but common humanity suggests they should be afforded the respect we give any human being and Margarino with his personal insults would deny them that.
Your opinions on the evolvement of heavyweights into bigger men over the years and indeed people in general reflect my own.
I didnt ,make this thread,nor do I agree with the intention and premise behind it.
The definition of a ****phobe is as follows,
"a person with a dislike of or prejudice against gay people:" Mr Margarino qualifies .
you don’t have to like gay people. Some people think what they do is gross. Its political correctness that labels that type of thinking “****phobicâ€. And the reason for this is the slow marxist push to abolish the family and abolish the male and female identity. This is the new globalist rainbow flag. In the future there will be no genders and people will be born in test tubes via government institution. The government will then raise the kids into the type of cattle it deems suitable.
there are 2 old books that are prophesy on what was to come: 1984 and Brave new world.
after Catholicism collapsed, new forms of managing people were conjured up. With a new found understanding of eugenics this time, as well as political science - although this likely existed long before it had a label. You had a war of communists, facists and ********s.
today with globalism, you can see they have taken ideas from a few past ideologies, including Catholicism. But it has a strong Marxist undertone. As you can see the marxist countries today have a very strong workforce due to the communist breeding program. Its clear Lenin and his chronies were big fans of Eugenics.
Catholicism at the time worked well with the family system. It raised the population, which was quite useful after something like the black death. It also meant they could indoctrinate all these new kids. Via the catholic church institution. All women did was create and raise kids. The only downside is only the men could work. Once the population was large enough the temptation to put everyone to work was too big. And thus ended the era of catholcism. And you saw things like Feminism and human rights type talk, but they were all about dismantling the old structure. Feminism basically put the women to work. America used the catholic model right up until the 70s. The white picket fence with a god fearing family was great after ww2. The 70s Thats when all that metal music w the anti religion themes popped up, gay rights and feminism hit full tilt.
the world is somebodies playground
Comment
-
Originally posted by them_apples View Post
Common humanity is just your personal set of rules that you purchased either from political correctness or religion subconsciously.
you donât have to like gay people. Some people think what they do is gross. Its political correctness that labels that type of thinking â****phobicâ. And the reason for this is the slow marxist push to abolish the family and abolish the male and female identity. This is the new globalist rainbow flag. In the future there will be no genders and people will be born in test tubes via government institution. The government will then raise the kids into the type of cattle it deems suitable.
there are 2 old books that are prophesy on what was to come: 1984 and Brave new world.
after Catholicism collapsed, new forms of managing people were conjured up. With a new found understanding of eugenics this time, as well as political science - although this likely existed long before it had a label. You had a war of communists, facists and ********s.
today with globalism, you can see they have taken ideas from a few past ideologies, including Catholicism. But it has a strong Marxist undertone. As you can see the marxist countries today have a very strong workforce due to the communist breeding program. Its clear Lenin and his chronies were big fans of Eugenics.
Catholicism at the time worked well with the family system. It raised the population, which was quite useful after something like the black death. It also meant they could indoctrinate all these new kids. Via the catholic church institution. All women did was create and raise kids. The only downside is only the men could work. Once the population was large enough the temptation to put everyone to work was too big. And thus ended the era of catholcism. And you saw things like Feminism and human rights type talk, but they were all about dismantling the old structure. Feminism basically put the women to work. America used the catholic model right up until the 70s. The white picket fence with a god fearing family was great after ww2. The 70s Thats when all that metal music w the anti religion themes popped up, gay rights and feminism hit full tilt.
the world is somebodies playground
You don't have to like anyone ,but disliking total strangers because of their sexual orientation is bigoted and illogical.
Your diatribe sounds just like that guff Senator McCarthy was espousing back in the day,with his Reds Under The Beds scary tales.
It's Communism that has collapsed not Catholicism.
It was the ****s who were big fans of Eugenics not the Bolsheviks.
It was the 1st WW, which ushered in women to the workplace and pushed the right to vote to be ratified in the US in1920,[it took another 8 years in the UK.]
Your figures are wrong.
China the worlds largest Communist country has seen its population growth fal to record levels.
China, the worlds largest Communist country has seen its population growth fall to record levels..- www.theguardian.com › world › 2024China population decline accelerates as birthrate hits record ...
Jan 17, 2024 · Share. China’s population decline has accelerated, with a second year of record-low birthrates. The total number of people in China dropped by 2.75 million – or 0.2% – to 1.409 billion in ... - www.nytimes.com › business › china-birth-rateChina’s Population Falls, Heralding a Demographic Crisis
Jan 16, 2023 · Births were down from 10.6 million in 2021, the sixth straight year that the number had fallen, according to the National Bureau of Statistics. China’s overall population now stands at 1.41... - www.nytimes.com › china-birth-rate-2023China’s Population Shrank Again in 2023 as Births Continue to ...
Jan 16, 2024 · China said on Wednesday that 9.02 million babies were born in 2023, down from 9.56 million in 2022 and the seventh year in a row that the number has fallen. Taken together with the number of... - www.bbc.com › news › world-asia-china-64300190China's population falls for first time since 1961 - BBC
Jan 17, 2023 · 17 January 2023. By Kelly Ng,BBC News. Getty Images. China's birth rate has hit a record low. China's population has fallen for the first time in 60 years, with the national birth....
- www.bbc.com › news › world-europe-51120165Russia's ***** seeks to stimulate birth rate - BBC
Jan 15, 2020 · President Vladimir ***** has announced a series of plans to increase the number of children being born in Russia from an average birth rate of under 1.5 per woman to 1.7 within four years.... - Videos
1:58
youtube.com
As birth rates decline, Russia's population shrinks
24 Feb 2018
27.5K views3:15
bbc.co.uk
Russia's ***** seeks to stimulate birth rate
15 Jan 20202:47
youtube.com
Russia - Changing of Population Pyramid & Demographics (1950-2100)
13 Sep 2019
30.4K views
- www.ft.com › content › 95082ead-ea72-4af3/9270/10019Russia struggles with a demographic crunch - Financial Times
Dec 2, 2023 · Raising Russia’s birth rates and reversing population decline have been goals close to *****’s heart throughout his 23-year rule, but never more so than in the past three or four years ... - en.wikipedia.org › wiki › Demographics_of_RussiaDemographics of Russia - Wikipedia
The crude birth rate - 8.9 per 100,000 inhabitants - was the lowest since the year 2000. Russia has one of the lowest fertility rates in the world with 1.42 children per woman in 2022, below 2.1 children per woman, which must be the number reached in order to maintain its population.- Birth rate: 9.0 births/1,000 population (2022)
- Growth rate: -0.39 (2020)
- Death rate: 13.1 deaths/1,000 population (2022)
- Population: 147,182,123 (2021 census), 144,699,673 (excluding Crimea)
- www.economist.com › europe › 2023/03/04Russia’s population nightmare is going to get even worse
Mar 4, 2023 · Its population is falling unusually fast and may drop to 130m by mid-century. The decline is associated with increased misery: the life expectancy at birth of Russian males plummeted from 68.8 in ... - www.bbc.com › news › world-europe-51118616How do countries fight falling birth rates? - BBC
Jan 15, 2020 · President ***** says that Russia's birth rate is currently at 1.48 women per children. While this is a significant increase from 1999, when the figure fell to 1.16, Mr ***** hopes to raise... - www.bbc.co.uk › news › world-europe-51120165Russia's ***** seeks to stimulate birth rate - BBC News
Jan 15, 2020 · President Vladimir ***** has announced a series of plans to increase the number of children being born in Russia from an average birth rate of under 1.5 per woman to 1.7 within four years....
Last edited by Ivich; 04-10-2024, 05:13 AM.
Comment
- www.theguardian.com › world › 2024China population decline accelerates as birthrate hits record ...
-
Originally posted by Marchegiano View Post
Travel is an accomplishment? TF are you even on about bro? When are you going to admit it's impossible for a 245 pound human being to have the stamina of a 185 pound human being?
That's halo effect homie. You've put bigguns on such a pedestal you've stripped them of their humanity. Because you're dumb.
TF do you have a list of famous gays for? I called you all sorts of words that mean soft. You chose one and decided to pretend to be too ****** to understand the context it was delivered and conflated it with a different usage.wowee how can I ever follow that.
Oh, inventor of the prosthesis that are used for transitioning individuals? Did that at 19. While you were traveling.
Just another thing for you to get wrong. Say something right. Or at least address how ****ing exposed your dumbass is.
Why should anyone ever consider you opinion when you can't admit a scientific fact? They shouldn't and this thread's proof of how ****ed to death bias you actually are. Still have not acknowledged there is no possible way for Wlad to have Rocky's stamina.****ing incredible.
I boxed for nearly 20 years during that time I was never ,"soft", I would have beat the piss out of a psuedo crank like you without working up a sweat,now behave yourself you ridiculous onanist.
Comment
-
Originally posted by fifth_root View Post
She never described herself as something different than a woman. She was married and had children. That's enough, not what Hugo or anyone else thinks. Ascribing her things that suit the ideology of other era people is incorrect and disrespectful.
"Never" is kind of hard to prove.
Who are you to assume she would feel disrespected?
Comment
-
Originally posted by Willie Pep 229 View Post
According to the Wikipedia excerpt above she refered to herself as non-binary which is close enough to make the transgender list.
"Never" is kind of hard to prove.
Who are you to assume she would feel disrespected?
Darius the Great described himself Aryan, so what - he is a ****? As I said - ascribing things is i correct and manipulative. Enough of this talk.
Comment
-
Originally posted by fifth_root View Post
It is what Hugo said - how is that any valid? Plus, "non-binary" was never used, it didn't even exist back then. So until someone shows a proof she herself described in any way, "never" is solid and hard to disprove.
Darius the Great described himself Aryan, so what - he is a ****? As I said - ascribing things is i correct and manipulative. Enough of this talk.
I believe the word Aryan was appropriated in the other direction.
Comment
Comment