Not to diss, but it seems that you really didn't follow the division closely back then. Remember more importantly than who is when.
Again, more importantly than who is when.
He wasn't a bum. But, he was a tough journeyman/fringe contender level fighter.
I won't argue that. But, he couldn't carry margarito jockstrap.
Nobody? This is not true. Lets not use hyperbole.
Floyd also had negotiations with Margarito after Judah lost to Baldomir. Which is weird since Marg was a "nobody" but whatever. Either way he still went on with the Judah fight.
Who is this "everyone" that said mayweather was ducking Baldomir? Brian Kenny? Is he the be all and end be all(no disrespect to Brian Kenny, I actually liked him on FNF's) of boxing public opinion?
But, of course if Floyd was going to fight Judah, then yes why not fight the guy that actually beat him instead. It makes sense for that to be said.
I'm not denying that Baldomir was the lineal champ. But, lineal champ does not mean you're the best fighter in the division. You falling into the trap in believing that it equates to each other.
And, please stop playing Floyd as the victim. No one would have said he would have been ducking Malignaggi. Let's cut the nonsense shall we?
Yea, you can't fight for the title if you don't pay the sanctioning fee.
He was dropped against a Euro-Bum level fighter early in his career, early in the fight. But, was visibly put on queer street and almost KTFO by Collazo.
Judah was more flashy thank slick. But, yea we will agree to disagree on that one.
They were not prospects though man. Floyd already had achieved ATG status in a division and then moved up to beat the greatest LW in the last 15 years twice. He was 3 division title holder, and a 2 division lineal champ. Judah was a 2 division title holder and a former unified, undisputed, lineal champ. They had accomplished their feat already. Hell Floyd was a HOF'er before even going to WW.
Margarito was recognized as the best in the division. While Baldomir was recognized as the lineal champ.
And, my point is that Hatton wasn't smaller than Mayweather. He wasn't stronger than Floyd. But, he also wasn't smaller.
Yea Floyd had fought in September of 09' and Mosley in January of 09'
He was Knocked Down early in his career, in the first round, but he wasn't Hurt, he was more off balance. If you haven't seen the fight, don't comment. He was rocked by Collazo, but he didn't go down. Hatton's durability suffered greatly after Tszyu. He walked through people, until he move to WW. If you don't give Mayweather any credit, you don't give credit to his opposition. It's a losing battle.
You have to respect Mayweather, in order to understand his resume and the way he defeated his opposition. The people that claim Mayweather isn't good/great, are those that are in love with Manny Pacquiao (the majority of them). A few posts ago, someone called him boring, and claimed Pacquiao was a Knock Out Machine.
Mayweather is beautiful to watch. There's technique, speed, and defense in the things he does. I guess if you love pure boxing (the sweet science), you should appreciate the way he wins, and how he fights.
Manny is more explosive, but he hasn't had a stunning KO since Hatton. I'm not going to go into how Hatton's punch resiliency had been completely depleted by then, because I respect Pacquiao, and he deserves the win. Once you sign the contract, it's on you to find a way to win.
But he isn't a KO machine. He should have finished Clottey, who landed 6 uppercuts and fcuked up his face.
He should have finished Cotto sooner.
Margarito was too durable.
Marquez has his number.
Mosley ran away from him. He should have caught Mosley, and finished him, but he couldn't.
Mayweather has fought good opposition. If you say he cherry picked, then the same goes for Manny. But in order for that arguement to come to a close, you have to respect both fighters, and what they've done in their careers. I'm rambling, cause I hate when no one credits Hatton, so I'm out.