Actually you must of thought it was an easy idea to reapond to my post since I clearly stated Floyd winning 3 Ring titles at 154 whereas Pac never ventured there again after Margarito. You do realize who Cotto and Canelo are? They are not retired. GGG is a fighter in boxing? So now let's add Pacquiao in the mix. Do you have anything cool.to say about the match ups? You do follow boxing I take? You might want to look at the current p4p rankings from the sanctioning bodies or the ring. The picture might be clearer. If not, reread what I wrote from your smart aleck response. I should have been more clear...
So if you think mayweather should of fought GGG you must be a manny fanyboy?Mayweather is/was the junior middle champion. GGG wanted to fight Mayweather at that weight because he wanted to fight mayweather. What does this have to do with pac? Im not gonna go back n forth with you if you don't get this. If you dint listen to a word from my last post, youll just deny everything else...........probably why ur still a mayweather fanboy
Do people expect for Floyd to be officially caught for it to be fact? Explain how that's possible with usadas testing? The only likely outcome of him being caught is if he is using an iv to mask peds, which he was x7 the limit and Floyd knows this which is exactly why it was done at his house and dint inform anyone. In what other universe is this not the biggest proof that he is cheating. Without the use of cr testing even when there's a red flag. How else can they logically catch him??? How can anyone defend this stuff? Boxing, the most corrupt sport and an article highlighting all off this. You cannot pretend you know he's not cheating when you know that you would never even know if he was. Him not informing anyone about the iv is the only proof you need to know that he's juicing, it's on him to prove that he's not by being properly tested
What does this have to do with what I said? GGG, Pac...
"People claiming that Floyd dint face GGG..."
What does it have to do with what I said??? I knew it was a bad idea to respond to your post
Again, ladies and gentlemen, we pose questions, we give answers, but when it comes to receiving an educated response we get Cowardice replies. Again. Common sense. Now. Hence, now. GGG is an active top p4p fighter. Isn't Pac? Didn't Pac fight at 154? Do Pac fans not want GGG? Wtf? Are they admitting he'd lose? I dknt get ot. This is fight thay would benefit the sport of boxing you nunce.
How many Ring titles has Floyd fought? 12! Pac 6! GGG, none.
You guys have some obnoxious way to merit matches. As if Abel Sanchez or Loeffler, the cricket K2 cheerleaders, per their endless dumb excuses online, haven't made it clear that they would love to have had cashed in on Floyd. Just like Chino's inactive ass at 200lbs throughout the year enjoying that money...
If you haven't noticed, every fighter beaten by Floyd has confessed how good he is. That might mean something... especially those cute smiles after Pac and Floyd fought. They got their money. Pac doesn't care. He needs the money. Now go watch some cartoons bro.
.....jesus. So how does this answer why mayweather would never fight GGG? You start with that question and end with pacquiao.........Your the one kissing floyds ass, im not kissing mannys. So why is the the best ever chosen not to EVER defend against golovkin. Not that hes not worthy yet, mayweather said hes 160, so he would NEVER fight him. Fair enough he dint have to, neither does manny, I don't think mannys p4p 2nd at this time and golovkin was challenging FLOYD, so you can at least agree that neither are the best??
Boxing is the most corrupt sport of them all and always has been. Anyone who believes mayweather did nothing wrong is either and idiot or lying to themselves. Mayweathers fans (not a fanboy of either) cant even say greatest of all time, they have to change it to BEST because he has a flawless record (Castillo). Mayweather showed signs of greatness but chose to just say he was the best instead of proving it by fighting a prime manny pacquiao 6 years ago or defending his title at junior middle against golovkin. Fans say he shouldn't DEFEND his title against golvkin because its not fair??? And you claim this guys the best ever. PLeeeeease. As he says, proof is in the pudding and that's why he cant even admit hes the GREATEST because hes not willing to take the risk and find out. He does what ever it takes to get a win, so why would you think hes not doping?? HIT and not get HIT. Not don't get hit and touch. Trying find me 5 clean solid power punches in that fight that mayweather landed on pacquiao. Not half blocked half to the chest straight rights. Boos well deserved :)
Thats not the point though. He sux and a victory over Floyd would come so easy for him even tho he sux. Floyd is a legend and carried the sport and a bum of GGG's caliber doesnt deserve to walk away with an easy victory over The greatest of this era. Its an insult.
I would rather Khan, or Pac beat Floyd somehow not just a bum who wins on size and power. He just wins on a technicality, not being the better fighter.
Floyd is the better boxer not fighter
Hes clearly better than average that was a bit exaggerated to make the thread stand out but from what you hear from fans and what I see from just watching golovkin, people are making him out as the new foreman or Tyson of the middleweight devision which to be honest I dont see. Will find out when he starts facing some great middleweights but I cant see him being undefeated for a long period of time. I assumed people dint think I thought ward was going to blow him away lol just makes you sound stupid for trying to point that out. mayweather canelo, Hopkins pavlik etc........destructions. Kovalev looks more unbeatable and more of a monster in his devision. This guys jabs to the body can put you down, golovkins looks the much easier to hit and easier guy to outbox. Will see what happens but for all the hype.....Im not that impressed
Hes clearly better than average that was a bit exaggerated to flock some of the golovkin fans but from what you hear about golovkin and what I see from just watching him, people are making him out as the new foreman or Tyson of the middleweight devision which I cant really see. Will find out when he starts facing some great middleweights but I cant see him being undefeated for a long period of time. I assumed people dint think I thought ward was going to blow him away lol just makes you sound stupid for trying to point that out. mayweather canelo, Hopkins pavlik etc (boxers defusing and painting destroyers) ........destructions. Kovalev looks more unbeatable and more of a monster in his devision. This guys jabs to the body can put you down, golovkins looks the much easier to hit and easier guy to outbox. Will see what happens but for all the hype.....Im not that impressed, seems more of a super provodnikov or povetkin with a bit more skill.
Floyd is a legend, and better in every aspect. GGG has never been in a fight. He destroys undermatched foes with one shot and they lay on the ground and shake it out.
Him sucking so much, he doesnt deserve an easy victory like that over a Legend who carried the sport. Its insulting.
Floyd is the one of greatest boxers of the sport and a definite great but a legend is someone who goes up in weight to fight the middleweight monsters even though the odds are against them. Ray Robinson, Ray Leonard etc or fight 3 champions in the same month, instead of waiting 6 years to hit, run n hold against a beaten up featherweight
People complaining that Floyd didn't face GGG....
Floyd. 154; 3 title bouts, and the Ring bouts.
Pac. 154. An old Margarito. Stenches of Arum.
Apparently Pacquiao fans are admitting that their own guy can't fight GGG, but Floyd should have? Are they admitting Pac's capacity? GGG and Pac are cowards. At least Pac fans would agree that Pac was/is perhaps the highest paid boxer now that Floyd is gone. If supposedly Pac is better than Floyd, then why wouldn't GGG call out Pac at 154? Isn't Pac the terminator? Is GGG scared? Is Pac scared?
When Floyd was around at least standards made sense.
Don't remember Manny giving detail reasons on why hes better than Ali and robinson. I also honestly cant remember Manny even after 6 years calling Mayweather a coward but mayweather had no problem saying it after his fight with him more than once. Nobodys saying golovkin is an easy guy to want to fight but neither was foreman or going up to middle to fight haggler or lammota. Ali was also not know as a puncher but still found away to ko liston (first man to do it.....twice,) frazier (only other man to do it was one of if not the hardest punching heavyweight of all time) and George foreman ( THE ONLY man to knock him out.) Don't try to pass it on, mayweather is the undefeated guy who believes hes better than the guy I mentioned above. This is like when religious people say the burden of proof is on the non believers.
Has mayweather ever been the underdog since hes been a champion? Why are people giving mayweather the pass on golovkin? Robinson dint have to go up to middle to fight jake Lammota or even move up to LHW! Ray leonard dint have to fight Marvin Hagler. Ali dint have to fight Foreman. They dint have to but they believed they were the best TBE! All of them I think were underdogs in those fights, Golovkins no different to a marvin haggler (if not EASIER!) TBE to mayweather is beating the guys that I can beat not the guys who people claim that WILL beat you. Guys fight mayweather all the time with a lot less chance of beating him than the chance of mayweather beating golovkin and mayweathers the one claiming TBE status, you cant defend this stuff. "If I beat him will you say he was washed up?" YES! and NO we already knew Manny was washed up, 36 yrs old featherweight with a ton of wars, 6 years to make the fight. You fought Manny coz he WAS washed up, beating him with air jabs, grabbing, running and landing the occasional half blocked right hand and a check left slap. With manny landing the only damaging punches in the fight.
Take any boxer and get them to fight an offencive fighter at the end of there career and they will always have the edge. I think manny would sweep the early rounds with Floyd with a very high chance of knockdown. Manny at his age still did some good damage AND counter punching in that fight and considering the size of mannys head is probably one of the least hit victims of Floyd. It would get more competitive towards the end but Floyd could only hope for a draw. I remember as soon as the fight had started I could see a massive difference between manny from 6 years ago. Not to mention theres more evidence that Floyd was doping than manny and add the possible injury manny had, people underestimate just how elusive and well manny did in that fight. Mannys speeds legit and that was the slowest version of manny this is why Floyd waited out 6 years. Just look at Jones vs hopkins or leonard duran. Prime jones and duran were way to much for them, maweather has exactly the same mentality as leonard when he chose to fight duran while he was over 200 pounds but mayweather took it once step further and waited for and out 6 years for an old pacman
Hes not speedy, has a glass chin and your saying he cant box and has no power. Has there ever been a heavyweight champ with these same weaknesses. It would be pretty amazing if hes got there with just strength and smarts alone. I never said he was heavyfisted, i said the power and damage he does on opponents is underated and his size contributes to his power. I think its pretty clear from the comments that his power is underated
Huge reach advantage for hearns, hearns also has the speed, boxing smarts and very aggressive. Jabs well to the body and gave the two best guys who beat him hell, one of them was one of the best middleweights ever with one of the best chins ever and the other was Ray leanord who he knocked down and beat in there second fight. Pacquiaos arms much smaller and has nothing hearns can't match except a chin, which makes no difference considering hearns power at welterweight. I give manny......no chance in this fight. Lightweight vs light hw
I think the fact that Mayweather is taller is actually an advantage for pacquiao. He's got short straight punches, instead of big looping punches that mayweather can easily duck so I see mayweather running a lot in this fight to keep his range. Mayweather will definitely land a lot of right hands in this fight tho
What the hell, people are still talking *******s and mayweather...brown nosers. Fights on! Who wins? Coz its GONA be close now, not like 5 years ago where Pacquiao woulda steamroll him :).
I think the difference between the other southpaws, is that I think pacquiao will get less frustrated and its hard to dominate manny because of his heart and skill set. He will be in the fight till the end but may have to chase Floyd a lot in the later rounds. I was surprised seeing them talking together, Floyd definitely looked surprisingly bigger to me but he was wearing a hoody and was trying to look big. I don't believe mayweather will be as strong as people think against pacquiao, especially seeing his fights recently. Mayweather cant run the whole fight and has got weaker, so i give manny a good chance to get a UD and a possible knockdown but im 50 50 and errr..........im excited. I like technical fights and this is a BIG one. Don't agree with the bookies that Floyd has the same chance as pacquaio of getting a KO. Marquez was big and caught him with a perfectly timed power punch. Mayweather is a completely different counter punch fighter and he has no chance of getting a ko against Manny.
My guess on Roachs plan is go heavy in the early rounds, gather energy in the mid rounds, by not chasing, feinting and making Floyd miss his counter and not get the chance to adapt to mannys style and then go heavy again in the late rounds and get the descision.
Yes, Floyd will look to land and grab.
don't think theres any doubt that he will land his right hand but I rarely see pacquiao in clinches maybe because of his sytle and strength. I think Floyd is not strong enough at his age to stand there with manny and will have to be smart, land his right hand and keep moving. Marquez and Bradley were both strong and don't mind taking a shot, mayweathers right hands will be quick and get out, bradleys and marquez had a lot more power behind them so manny will probably be walking down mayweather the whole fight and mayweather will still be under a lot of pressure. I think mayweather will take some big shots mid fight and towards the end and I think its gonna be close
People who think Pacquiao looked bad in the staterdown just remember the kovalev hopkins starrdown.......replica. Mayweather is digging down to a place I don't think he can reach and manny sees this in his eyes as delusion, that's what I think. Mayweathers quietness and talking about his family and what he's acheived tells me that he's preparing himself for the worst. cannot wait for this fight
Googled torn Achilles
"The Achilles tendon is at the back of the heel. It can be ruptured by sudden force on the foot or ankle. If your Achilles tendon is ruptured you will be unable to stand on tiptoe and will have a flat-footed walk"
Flat footed walk........pretty decent match, not just a sprained ankle like people are just guessing
Not only did he beat Hopkins but he put him down and looked good against him, I think the only thing golovkin has over kov is maybe p4p a better chin and a bit more skilled but stylistcly he's a beast with a jab to the body that can put u down. Defntly kovalev
And with that sort of money he will be sorted for life if managed properly...
Makes you question the audacity of some people accusing professional boxers of being idiots.
From what I see, furys Is in boxing coz he loves it and wants to be champ of the world, not just init for the money, and fighting haye is a big mistake. Not an idiot, just nuts! Hes getting floored
He gets knocked down by former world record holders for most Big Mac's eaten in one sitting.
http://i.imgflip.com/9wsn.gif
looked more like a slip to me
I think furys smart enough to know how dangerous haye is to him and he will try to fight smart in the early rounds, either by keeping his distant and snapping his jab quicker than hes done so before or he may try to just smother haye. Hayes gonna take this in less than 3 rounds, cant see how people are comparing fury to wlad and valuev. Fury does not have the chin or power of valuev and no way near the boxing ability or speed of Wlad. He has a glass jaw and theres a good chance he will be out cold in the first round, he would have to pull of something amazing to win this
I think Fury learned from the Cunningham fight and will have his most technically sound fight against Haye and will be in the best shape of his life. Fury presents too many problems for Haye if he comes in with a good gameplan and sticks to it.
He has been knocked down before cunningham in exactly the same way by the right hand and will be caught again! Hayes probably one of the worst heavyweights he can choose at this point. Only thing hes got going for him is size and heart. Hes good to watch, shame this fight will probably end his career