He is firmly to blame for Quigg-Frampton. He knows he's backing the loser and is trying to fool the casual public into believing it's the other sides fault.
The other two though? No.
Groves has seemed mentally gone since getting knocked cold by Froch. He grossly over-estimates his drawing power and a very off sense of self-worth.
Khan-Brook is nothing to do with Hearn, Khan simply wants no part of fighting Brook.
Spot on about groves, he's became slightly deluded
broner - the man is a clown plain and simple
bellew - used to love him, turned into a right noob of late, especially in the build up to fights
froch - see above
And ****ty mismatches on every card because of it bring back Warren's dominance atleast he is not so smug about screwing over the fans.
Nah, Warren was way too slow, He's finished. It's hearns game now but I'll admit he's turning into a right noob, but still miles better than warren ever was.
so the real question is what title do we prefer? lineage? undisputed? or just be the fighter regarded my most as the best in the division(GGG obv falls under the latter)
Personally i think lineage is becoming overrated, its became a cool word people use to look clever*kellerman*
At this moment I'm slightly leaning towards Brook by stoppage. But I could also easily see Khan dominating the fight with speed and in-and-out movement.
id say its khans to lose, his experience edges it for me
Im a Cotto fan but a boxing fan also. Cotto needs to defend the MW championship against a legitimate opponent or just give it up
He does, alas i fear he wont though, shame...
I definitely don't think so.
The size/power has got to be a factor in this fight. it's a genuine 50/50 fight.
Brook is not Malignaggi or Zab Judah or Devon Alexander.
He'll be the first genuine WW Khan will have faced. In fact, Brook is probably not even a year away from being a LMW.
Khan will also definitely be the quickest fighter Brook will have faced and also the sharpest fighter.
That's why it's such a good fight.
youve got a point here, brook is a big WW, looks like hes almost bursting out of his frame on some photos.
His comments don't help it, but you have to look at the quotes in my sign to get what I mean.
Ye i seen them lol, agree with you about khans comments too. The ending career shout is his latest pearler
froch-groves
degale-groves
eubank-benn(eubank always maintained he didnt 'hate' benn and that it was just business but the hate on both sides was real)
saunders-eubank jnr
barerra-morales
Jermain Taylor had the talent. He didn't use it as wisely as he should have. Now he's brain-damaged..
all time greatness, taylor isnt anywhere near that category sir, talented, yes, ATG status, no
Bad form mr Hearn, frankies last outing was poor to say the least. What a crappy fight.
Brook will wash him. Don't even compare this trash to khan vs algieri, and that fights not exactly appealing. FFS
His performance vs Corrales was probably my fave by any fighter ever, that was Floyd at his best IMO.
Vs Canelo he was outstanding, he was literally like a fly in the first few rounds, that win will gain even more credibility as the years go by.
Vs Hatton, the was he dismantled Hatton round by round was also incredible.
They're the best 3 I think(performances)
Ray Leonard for me, that may change may3rd though, winner of pac vs floyd gotta be right up there.
honourable mentions: ricardo lopez, RJJ, duran, beranrd hopkins
for a start, you shouldn't ever put lists on here unless you with to be ridiculed to the high heavens, especially on as big as this.
secondly, you have Floyd mayweather jr. at *56, so your saying hes only the 56th greatest ever to put a pair on, you must be old and love the nostalgic "the older generation of fighters were so tough and this and that and blah blah blah"
wake up, 56? really? jesus Christ
crazy list sir