Comments Thread For: Andy Ruiz's Trainer Voices Frustration Over Joshua Venue Reveal

[Sid-Knee]

Of course he was begging for the fight. He knew what some of us already knew. That beneath that facade was a combination of the Wizard of Oz characters. The heart of the cowardly lion, the movements of the tin man, and the brains of the scarecrow. Of course Eddie Hearn was the wizard behind the curtain fooling all of the british simpletons. Your not in Kansas anymore Redeemer!

You've just described yourself. So that's ironic. But you idiots don't understand irony do you?

Then you add in the fact you're a Wilder fan and it becomes way too extreme for words. It's hilarious that you're so backwards you don't recognise it. You have zero self awareness.

[Sid-Knee]

At the geginning, right after his loss, Joshua stated he wanted to avenge (try) his defeat at the same venue in America.
I have really gone off Joshua because of his response to his loss and this fights weird arrangements.

And now he's changed his mind by having it in a neutral venue. So what is it that you're complaining about? That Ruiz doesn't get home advantage again giving him a higher percentage of winning? Why do you care where the fight is held? What is actually the problem?

[Sid-Knee]

I’ll never understand the people who live in the Information Age and still refuse to do any research before making such a ludicrous statement.

What do you think will happen by having the fight over there?

I don't like what they stand for, but nothing is going to happen when they fight.

[Sid-Knee]

I love the fact that Ruiz and his cowardly ****** team are crying about fighting anywhere but the US. But then go on to say "We'll fight anywhere, we don't care" Hahahahahahahaha.

[Sid-Knee]

British posters - the United States is barbaric for allowing circumcision

also British posters - I mean, they circumcise women in Saudi Arabia, but THEY’RE GETTING BETTER!! Al Haymon Doe!!

Saudi Arabia is evil. We're not dis*****g that. But I can't see anything taking place while they fight.

[Sid-Knee]

Nobody likes British food. Makes me wonder how all of their teeth fall out. If I had to live there I’d starve to death.

You don't like cottage pie? Fish and chips? Many Canadians do. You have chip shops over there. They have chips with cheese and gravy.

What British food don't you like?

[Sid-Knee]

I heard if your caught with any ****es in your home u will be arrested in the uk... bland ass mu***as

One of the biggest sellers in the UK is Indian food. So no, you're wrong you ignorant moron. It's in the top 3 for our favourite food. Was at number 1 not too long back.

Make sure you know what you're talking about before you post next time so as not to be seen as idiotic.

[Sid-Knee]

A losing champ shouldn't be able to make rematch clauses like what Fast Eddie did.

Not to the extent the loser gets to set pay, time and venue and probably, ref, judges, dope tests and glove choice too now.

I'm hoping A side Andy tells em all to eff off and haymon backs him all the way to court.

The contract was signed when AJ was champ and hadn't lost. But you're too ****** to realise this?

Andy isn't the A side, no matter how toxic you are towards AJ due to beating your hero Parker.

[kafkod]

People from the UK in general bash North Americans for still using male circumcision, calling it barbaric and an outdated practice. I was pointing out the hypocrisy in how they make that statement, while at the same time turning a blind eye to women being circumcized in Saudi Arabia because they dislike a promotional company.

You have that back to front!

I'm in the UK and I've never, ever, heard anybody bashing America over male circumcision.

Male circumcision is not common here, but it is legal in the UK and not considered to be an issue anywhere else in the world.

But anybody caught practicing female circumcision - or female genital mutilation - in the UK can expect to be jailed for at least 10 years, and countries where FGM is legal, like Saudi Arabia, are frequently criticized for it in the media.

[Sid-Knee]

Why not go all out and have the rematch clause say...

In the event the champ loses, he retains the belts and titles until the rematch takes place and he loses again. Though should that happen, the initial loss shall be invalidated and another rematch undertaken for which the winner must be the champion who was incumbent before the first match took place.

Who is making a case for this other than you here? Stop projecting your madness onto us.

You're ******ity knows no bounds. Please stop posting.