What makes Hagler greater than De La Hoya??
Collapse
-
Was a great inside fighter too, not only did he have a better jab he used it to actually set up a lot of other punches, something RuPaul couldn't do.Comment
-
You don't have to move up, you can be great dominating a class and Hagler did just that and beat pretty much everyone around at 160.
Monroe and Watts would easily be belt holders in today's world and Hagler kept a lot of guys down who were very good fighter who would otherwise have been better known. I know by how you are treating them you don't know them to any real degree~
Castillejo is one of Oscar's better wins really~Comment
-
You obviously were not following his career. And stop lying about Whitaker's pound for pound ranking at the time. Both Trinidad and Quartey were considered to be more dangerous during that period.Comment
-
Comment
-
Comment
-
i agree with you on hagler's resume, but that version of ray leonard that beat hagler wouldnt have beat floyd,manny, or the mosley from the first oscar fightComment
-
Show me a source because when that fight was signed I coulda swore Pea was #2.Comment
-
Did De La Hoya run through Lightweight in the 90's though??? No he beat like two guys in the Top 10 there, but Ruelas was a good win for sure.
Oscar never dominated a weight class the way Hagler did 160, and Hagler won his biggest fights minus the Leonard fight. Hearns was better then every single Oscar win, and they both have around the same number of quality/decent/solid wins.Comment
-
Comment

Comment