Hagler didnt lose all his big fights.
What makes Hagler greater than De La Hoya??
Collapse
-
-
It has everything to do with it because you're taking away credit for the win and downgrading it big time.
It was an exciting fight, even if Oscar would of won, he wouldn't of gotten the full credit because Shane Mosley was coming up TWO divisions.Comment
-
Comment
-
Comment
-
No that's not what I'm doing. Refer to post #72.
Where have I taken credit away from that win? By saying Vargas was better?
Of course he get's credit for the win. It's one of his best wins.
It's still against a Whitaker who was visibly well into decline. That's a fact.
Still, a credible win.
I've not once said nor implied that he doesn't get credit for that win. All you've done is claim I've said things I haven't actually said multiple times.Comment
-
Hagler is way better than de la Hoya. De la Hoya was just fame like canelo. All his big wins are past prime big names and lost all big fights. Hagler beat guys like Duran hearns the beast Mugabi and the fights he lost to me he was robbed. De la Hoya had some robberies in his favor(strum comes to mind) as well(cash cow) and haggler lost to Leonard for the same reason cuz Leonard had a bigger name. He didn't hurt haggler in any second and flurried the las 10 second of each round and robbed the fight one of the scorecards was a joke as well.Comment
-
Comment
-
now poster are claiming Oscar was greater than Hagler?????????? The ignorant bu11shet here never stopsComment
-
Comment
Comment