Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Are The Klitschkos Some of The Worst Heavyweight Champions Of All Time?

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Originally posted by KBRO View Post
    You're pathetic.. still the same old jabs.. peace out son & you were schooled.. don't be deceived by the polls.. just know who the man i s up in here.. you can be the nuthugger killer . when Jimmy's not in the house... kap[ish!
    Exactly as i said, you're a liar with no proof to back it up when called out.

    Comment


    • James toney circa Holyfield fight would school either klitschko

      Comment


      • James toney circa Holyfield fight would wreck either klit

        Comment


        • Originally posted by JAB5239 View Post
          Exactly as i said, you're a liar with no proof to back it up when called out.
          I'd personally like to know why he seems incapable of putting together a coherent paragraph that actually says something instead of gibbering around in a circle :dunno9:

          Comment


          • Originally posted by KBRO View Post
            Your opinions of the numbers you posted are outright stretching the truth.. I never lied.. I have no reason to when I can take it to you with the truth.. go post again about top 10 ranked fighters in other eras & who they fought & LOST to.. most of them lost when they stepped up.. so it proves NOTHING when one is ranked 8 in one era & another is ranked 18 in this one.. it's apples & apples.. you're comparing here but way to make it look like past greats fought apples & Vitali has fought oranges.. it has no basis in fact as to the fighters ability where they were ranked when THESE fighters aren't great to begin with..



            Only championship fighters can be ranked against other championship fighters of the past & have the rankings mean something & be evaluated in a more accurate manner as they fought & beat most everyone that they fought in title bouts & have a few losses to show for it except for Marciano.. until you can prove fighter B plus is better than a B plus or a C minus in this era without placing too much significance in how far they reached a certain fighting list without stepping over the mountain.

            You've done nothing but manipulated those rankings.. it's like a top 10 song list... until you have proof one song sounds better than another when the tunes are similar in nature...you'll always be stretching the truth.. I won't call them lies just because you've accused me of lieing as why I should I sink to your level.

            & for your information a top 30 fighter in this era can be better than a top 10- 15 fighter in other eras even if they didn't manage to go up the list sometimes it's NOT about who you fought.. it's about the opportunity you got to show your ability..... it's higher stature where you're ranked but not necessarily does it prove you are better.

            To me it'll always be about how you fought.. & less about who you fought when reaching the highest of levels possible which the Klitschko's have done & the way Wlad has fought leads me to believe he's inferior to Vitali & will always be based on how many ways Wlad is capable of losing if his gameplan is not implemented vs his older brother's style.


            The way I separate Wlad from Vitali & evaluate them isn't because Wlad has fought better names.. it's how they'd fare against each other & how they've FOUGHT against similar comp. Wlad has lost in devastating fashion to guys Vitali has completely destroyed with relative ease.. Wlad can lose AT ANY moment even though he's found a way to protect the chin... any lucky punch gets through he is most likely toast same as Lewis... Vitali... it's not a guarantee any One lucky shot can bring him down... this is a MAJOR advantage that you fail to see.. but yet have other fighter ahead because of what there name or rank looked like when they HAVE more ways of losing than Vitali does in a boxing match... it's absurd & will always be absurd.. this line of thinking.
            So Deontay Wilder is better than Klit.

            Comment


            • nice poll results.

              though I am sure if it was anonymous it would look so much different

              Comment


              • Originally posted by Simurgh View Post
                though I am sure if it was anonymous it would look so much different
                Different how?

                Comment


                • Originally posted by KBRO View Post
                  Yes... he would...
                  ................

                  Comment


                  • Originally posted by Jedi Vader View Post
                    So Deontay Wilder is better than Klit.
                    So far he has less ways of losing than Wladimir but still more ways of potentially losing than Vitali because of that jaw shield he's got going on.

                    We're comparing champions here.. so wait til Deontay gets his.. the fact that the Klitschko's have both been loserless for an entire decade lends to the fact we're comparing the cream of the crop of the best heavyweight champions ever... half here don't think they're all-time great heavies & should be whacked from this site on principal alone.

                    Comment


                    • Originally posted by JAB5239 View Post
                      Exactly as i said, you're a liar with no proof to back it up when called out.
                      You still holding on to the mantra of calling someone a liar when they have utterly destroyed all your bs claims of non greatness for the Brother's of the Ukraine? I liked you better with the pink dress on.. at least I could laugh while taking someone to school.. leave the Billy Joel impersonations for the professionals.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP