Originally posted by KBRO
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Are The Klitschkos Some of The Worst Heavyweight Champions Of All Time?
Collapse
-
-
-
-
Originally posted by KBRO View PostYour opinions of the numbers you posted are outright stretching the truth.. I never lied.. I have no reason to when I can take it to you with the truth.. go post again about top 10 ranked fighters in other eras & who they fought & LOST to.. most of them lost when they stepped up.. so it proves NOTHING when one is ranked 8 in one era & another is ranked 18 in this one.. it's apples & apples.. you're comparing here but way to make it look like past greats fought apples & Vitali has fought oranges.. it has no basis in fact as to the fighters ability where they were ranked when THESE fighters aren't great to begin with..
Only championship fighters can be ranked against other championship fighters of the past & have the rankings mean something & be evaluated in a more accurate manner as they fought & beat most everyone that they fought in title bouts & have a few losses to show for it except for Marciano.. until you can prove fighter B plus is better than a B plus or a C minus in this era without placing too much significance in how far they reached a certain fighting list without stepping over the mountain.
You've done nothing but manipulated those rankings.. it's like a top 10 song list... until you have proof one song sounds better than another when the tunes are similar in nature...you'll always be stretching the truth.. I won't call them lies just because you've accused me of lieing as why I should I sink to your level.
& for your information a top 30 fighter in this era can be better than a top 10- 15 fighter in other eras even if they didn't manage to go up the list sometimes it's NOT about who you fought.. it's about the opportunity you got to show your ability..... it's higher stature where you're ranked but not necessarily does it prove you are better.
To me it'll always be about how you fought.. & less about who you fought when reaching the highest of levels possible which the Klitschko's have done & the way Wlad has fought leads me to believe he's inferior to Vitali & will always be based on how many ways Wlad is capable of losing if his gameplan is not implemented vs his older brother's style.
The way I separate Wlad from Vitali & evaluate them isn't because Wlad has fought better names.. it's how they'd fare against each other & how they've FOUGHT against similar comp. Wlad has lost in devastating fashion to guys Vitali has completely destroyed with relative ease.. Wlad can lose AT ANY moment even though he's found a way to protect the chin... any lucky punch gets through he is most likely toast same as Lewis... Vitali... it's not a guarantee any One lucky shot can bring him down... this is a MAJOR advantage that you fail to see.. but yet have other fighter ahead because of what there name or rank looked like when they HAVE more ways of losing than Vitali does in a boxing match... it's absurd & will always be absurd.. this line of thinking.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Jedi Vader View PostSo Deontay Wilder is better than Klit.
We're comparing champions here.. so wait til Deontay gets his.. the fact that the Klitschko's have both been loserless for an entire decade lends to the fact we're comparing the cream of the crop of the best heavyweight champions ever... half here don't think they're all-time great heavies & should be whacked from this site on principal alone.
Comment
-
Originally posted by JAB5239 View PostExactly as i said, you're a liar with no proof to back it up when called out.
Comment
Comment