Are The Klitschkos Some of The Worst Heavyweight Champions Of All Time?

[JAB5239]

Yeah.. you've gotten help from your friends & the higher-ups.. so they've stopped ME from posting & therefore you got spared the rest of the beatdown I was administering.. this is just the long sought out rematch you've been avoiding.. gnite!

Since when have I ever needed help with a nuthugger who ignores facts in favor of assumptions and agenda? And lol at the "higher ups" helping me! I've been banned like 5 times in the last 18 months for whomping on Klitards and not knowing when to walk away. But you have yourself a good night to Jimmy.

[thuggery]

70 posts in one thread about a fighter you don't even like!!!

DAMN!! Is that a new record? It's gotta be!

[StarshipTrooper]

Why would they get "fried" if they're of the same opinion as yours and you're (lol) taking me to school? I have no doubt the Klit brigade have been giving you green, but the truth is no one else is posting because they don't want to look like as big a fool as you look. They'll keep silently cheering you on just so somebody with stand up from their heroes and protect them from big, bad JAB and the truth.

I've no doubt the "green k" is from the same five Klitlickers that who's names you'll easily recall. Maybe some "bonus green" from their alt accounts :chuckle9:

[JAB5239]

70 posts in one thread about a fighter you don't even like!!!

DAMN!! Is that a new record? It's gotta be!

I love that me posting about the Klits drives you to follow me around to see just how much I've posted. Secret stalker issues?

[KBRO]

I love that me posting about the Klits drives you to follow me around to see just how much I've posted. Secret stalker issues?

At least he's giving a FACTUAL account of the numbers.. better to applaud such extensive data research than get on the offensive about it.. they say those who hate.. love the most in disguise & I know you cheer on Vitali when he comes out & is getting ready PRE-beatdown to Hell's Bell's.. same as all of his fans... you could tell me.. I won't hold it against you!

[JAB5239]

At least he's giving a FACTUAL account of the numbers.. better to applaud such extensive data research than get on the offensive about it.. they say those who hate.. love the most in disguise & I know you cheer on Vitali when he comes out & is getting ready PRE-beatdown to Hell's Bell's.. same as all of his fans... you could tell me.. I won't hold it against you!

Exactly what numbers have i posted that werent factual and done absolutely the same for everyone else i did it for? Hurry up, I'll wait.

[KBRO]

Exactly what numbers have i posted that werent factual and done absolutely the same for everyone else i did it for? Hurry up, I'll wait.

It's what you MAKE of your biased poll percentages & what your Top 10 RANKS back in the day equate to different eras.. you've placed too much value & opinion on rankings & think just because someone has faced a few less ranked fighters therefore they have fought inferior competition.. at least with My VK numbers.. I'm talking about WHAT he actually did & not what his opponents of his opposition did (can you say third party issues)... you're welcome.

Everything in the end leads back to the fighter & his accomplishments no matter how you twist & shout about it. Did Vitali more than bring it against everyone he has ever fought & please let's NOT get INTO why it wasn't fully brung in the losses as we already know the cause & effect.

Vitali the fighter has been an actual beast vs anyone who's ever lined up against him through the ropes with the least amont of boxing weaknesses other than physical issues.. so dissect the third party opposition resistance all you want.



Vitali handles everyone who gets in the ring.. no exception except in your warped views.. his opposition didn't bring it because Vitali did.. until you realize this.. the dead horse will always be beat.

[JAB5239]

It's what you MAKE of your biased poll percentages & what your Top 10 RANKS back in the day equate to different eras.. you've placed too much value & opinion on rankings & think just because someone has faced a few less ranked fighters therefore they have fought inferior competition.. at least with My VK numbers.. I'm talking about WHAT he actually did & not what his opponents of his opposition did (can you say third party issues)... you're welcome.

So you lied again, right?

[KBRO]

So you lied again, right?

Your opinions of the numbers you posted are outright stretching the truth.. I never lied.. I have no reason to when I can take it to you with the truth.. go post again about top 10 ranked fighters in other eras & who they fought & LOST to.. most of them lost when they stepped up.. so it proves NOTHING when one is ranked 8 in one era & another is ranked 18 in this one.. it's apples & apples.. you're comparing here but way to make it look like past greats fought apples & Vitali has fought oranges.. it has no basis in fact as to the fighters ability where they were ranked when THESE fighters aren't great to begin with..



Only championship fighters can be ranked against other championship fighters of the past & have the rankings mean something & be evaluated in a more accurate manner as they fought & beat most everyone that they fought in title bouts & have a few losses to show for it except for Marciano.. until you can prove fighter B plus is better than a B plus or a C minus in this era without placing too much significance in how far they reached a certain fighting list without stepping over the mountain.

You've done nothing but manipulated those rankings.. it's like a top 10 song list... until you have proof one song sounds better than another when the tunes are similar in nature...you'll always be stretching the truth.. I won't call them lies just because you've accused me of lieing as why I should I sink to your level.

& for your information a top 30 fighter in this era can be better than a top 10- 15 fighter in other eras even if they didn't manage to go up the list sometimes it's NOT about who you fought.. it's about the opportunity you got to show your ability..... it's higher stature where you're ranked but not necessarily does it prove you are better.

To me it'll always be about how you fought.. & less about who you fought when reaching the highest of levels possible which the Klitschko's have done & the way Wlad has fought leads me to believe he's inferior to Vitali & will always be based on how many ways Wlad is capable of losing if his gameplan is not implemented vs his older brother's style.


The way I separate Wlad from Vitali & evaluate them isn't because Wlad has fought better names.. it's how they'd fare against each other & how they've FOUGHT against similar comp. Wlad has lost in devastating fashion to guys Vitali has completely destroyed with relative ease.. Wlad can lose AT ANY moment even though he's found a way to protect the chin... any lucky punch gets through he is most likely toast same as Lewis... Vitali... it's not a guarantee any One lucky shot can bring him down... this is a MAJOR advantage that you fail to see.. but yet have other fighter ahead because of what there name or rank looked like when they HAVE more ways of losing than Vitali does in a boxing match... it's absurd & will always be absurd.. this line of thinking.

[KBRO]

& yes guys.. the less JABS writes in his rebuttal the more he has been taken to school.. don't believe the hype.