Vitali's mythical poor resume pt 2
Collapse
-
-
Adamek is probably the better fighter, certainly more skilled, and I wouldn't argue a h2h win for him over Peter with both at their best. But I respectfully think Peter was the most accomplished of this lot a heavyweight.Comment
-
Damn Cliff. That was out of character. I guess even the most patient of posters can have enough lol.I just got a nasty karma gram (ooooooo no) from Boxing Goat because I pointed out the paper nature of Peter's title claim before the Vitali fight. It's just a simple process of elimination argument; it's the same logic used to eliminate Iran Barkley from the lineage argument leading to Nunn-Kalambay.
It doesn't make the Peter win unimpressive. That was nice work four years off the bench. It does point out how irrational Goat is.
Red K back at ya nitwit.
I almost never block posters but, yeah, you're dismissed.Comment
-
vitali is a really good fighter. People just need to lay off the stuff where they try to make him out to be invincible. You keep doing that with any fighter where it isn't merited and a backlash is inevitable. And seriously ye also need to lay off the lewis injury talk etc. Just accept that he lost that fight fair and square according to EVERY rule of boxing.Comment
-
Ha. No way, buddy. Vitali was prepared to fight on and could have stopped Lewis within a round or two. Lewis was gassed and ready to go.vitali is a really good fighter. People just need to lay off the stuff where they try to make him out to be invincible. You keep doing that with any fighter where it isn't merited and a backlash is inevitable. And seriously ye also need to lay off the lewis injury talk etc. Just accept that he lost that fight fair and square according to EVERY rule of boxing.Comment
-
By the rules of boxing Vitali lost that fight. That's not up for debate.
Wouldas, shouldas and couldas count for nought.
If you want to bash Lummox, then you have a case with him not giving a rematch given the controversy of the fight and LL's dragged out decisionmaking on whether to continue his career or not.Comment
-
Try and cover it up all you want you thick c*nt but you said NEVER stepped into the ring with somebody like Frazier. Saying NEVER cannot refer to one single comeback fight can it? No it cannot you moron, so that makes you either forgetful, illiterate or a liar. You choose which. All of the above I assume would be more accurate though based on the ****** **** you talk about all the time.At least I read the whole conversation before I respond.....while you're too ****ing lazy and wind up looking like as ass as a result.
Maybe YOU would like to forget TKO6 but I'll guarantee you I'll never let that happen. If you had BOTHERED to read the whole conversation it would have been obvious to even a d1ckhead like you that the subject was POST comeback Vitali. So either you're either a windowlicker who has no reading comprehension or you're a lazy twat who can't be arsed brush up on what he's shooting off his jizz receptacle over.
Either way you look like an idiot.Comment
-
So you're basically admitting you're lazy douche who can't be bothered to read the whole conversation. Gotcha! In that case, since you can't be arsed to clue yourself in about what's being talked about, feel free to NOT run your **** holster about any of the posts in said discussion b1tch.Try and cover it up all you want you thick c*nt but you said NEVER stepped into the ring with somebody like Frazier. Saying NEVER cannot refer to one single comeback fight can it? No it cannot you moron, so that makes you either forgetful, illiterate or a liar. You choose which. All of the above I assume would be more accurate though based on the ****** **** you talk about all the time.
PS. Giving Cliff a red shot? Really? Do you always feel you have to go full ****** in public?Comment
-
Comment
-
Comment
Comment