Vitali's mythical poor resume pt 2

[JAB5239]

Title fights without consideration of who was fought in those title fights are a worthless measure. The quality of the opponent is what matters not whether there's a cheap alphabet bauble attached to it.

Add to that the whole undisputed championship vs disputed championship and all but Louis and Ali drop considerably.

[JAB5239]

In case anyone was interested:

Rules Regarding WBC Championship Belts
ARTICLE III - CHAMPIONSHIP OBLIGATIONS

3.5 Mandatory Defense Obligations. All WBC champions shall make at least one (1) mandatory defense per year, unless an exception is granted by the WBC in its sole discretion. A champion may be required to make more than one mandatory defense per year, if the WBC has designated more than one mandatory challenger for any reason. No bout shall be considered a mandatory defense unless specifically approved by the WBC and
made exclusively against an official mandatory challenger designated by the WBC. A challenger who wins the title shall automatically inherit the mandatory defense obligations of the champion he defeated, unless the WBC in its sole discretion otherwise directs.

3.6 Timing and Extensions of Mandatory Defense Obligations. The time periods for mandatory defenses stated in these Rules may be altered by the WBC in its sole discretion under special circumstances, including if a champion has defended the title in a voluntary defense against a contender the WBC may have deemed a mandatory challenger. No mandatory bout may be contested until such time as is required for a mandatory defense
under these Rules and Regulations, including any extensions that may be granted by the WBC in its sole discretion.

What this basically says is that Vitali is not breaking any rules by the WBC, he's just playing the game by their rules. They are reviewing his reasons for wanting extensions and allowing it so us as fans need not worry about the reasons they chose to allow extensions for some fighters while declining them for other fighters.

No, what its saying is they can pick and choose who to keep as champion and who to strip discriminately for the same violation.

[Boxing Goat]

If you aren't involved in the convo then you need to read the context or keep your cum dumpster shut.

Big words tough guy.

If that's the case don't ever interject on any thread where nobody formally invited you into them then. Does that make any kind of sense?

Don't get mad because I fronted you out on some snivelling, Vitali hating rant where your moronic, grossly far off view of Vitali made you actually forget he fought Lennox tooth and nail.

Maybe alzheimers syndrome kicking in?

[JAB5239]

Big words tough guy.

If that's the case don't ever interject on any thread where nobody formally invited you into them then. Does that make any kind of sense?

Don't get mad because I fronted you out on some snivelling, Vitali hating rant where your moronic, grossly far off view of Vitali made you actually forget he fought Lennox tooth and nail.

Maybe alzheimers syndrome kicking in?

Boy this sounds awful familiar!

And don't talk about Alzheimer's, my mother has that...and cancer...and diabetes! I didn't need to be reminded of that today!

[Boxing Goat]

Title fights without consideration of who was fought in those title fights are a worthless measure. The quality of the opponent is what matters not whether there's a cheap alphabet bauble attached to it.

Half of Ali, Holmes and Louis' defenses were against much, much worse opposition than Wladimir & Vitali's. That is a fact based on their records.




........waiting on a bull**** hater response because there couldn't possibly be anything else considered.

[JAB5239]

Half of Ali, Holmes and Louis' defenses were against much, much worse opposition than Wladimir & Vitali's. That is a fact based on their records.




........waiting on a bull**** hater response because there couldn't possibly be anything else considered.

Quit your lying, I already did a breakdown on three of Louis' lesser opponents showing they in FACT fought more top 10 fighters than ANY of Vittles opponents have. You of course chose to ignore that like you will this. You can't handle the truth!!

Post 234 in this very thread...Should I get into the better fighters next?

Just for fun and because his resume has taken some flak on this forum lately I decided to show exactly why Vittles Klitschko's resume is very WEAK.

Randomly I picked out 3 names off of Joe Louis' resume as champion. I made sure to pick moderate names and not the best to better be able to prove my point that Vits resume stinks because the fighters he fought have proven very little against other top fighters.

Bob Pastor

Jimmy Bivins
Gus Lesnivich
Tami Mauriello
Billy Conn
Al McCoy
Gus Dorazio
Lee Ramage
Lou Nova

Tami Mauriello

Gus Lesnivich
Gunner Barlund
Bob Pastor
Red Burman
Jimmy Bivins
Lou Nova
Lee Savold

Cesar Brion

Lasrarza
Mauriello
Layne
Lowry

All fighters named were in the top 10 during, shortly before or shortly after fighting Louis.

All these fights against one another came within a couple of years before or after fighting Louis. They are proven commodities and that isn't even getting into the better fighters on Joes record.

Now...would anyone like to explain how Vits comp are proven commodities, or should we just call his resume good and him an ATG because you say so?

Edit: Louis wan't champion when he fought Brion. But you get the point.

[Poet682006]

Big words tough guy.

If that's the case don't ever interject on any thread where nobody formally invited you into them then. Does that make any kind of sense?

Don't get mad because I fronted you out on some snivelling, Vitali hating rant where your moronic, grossly far off view of Vitali made you actually forget he fought Lennox tooth and nail.

Maybe alzheimers syndrome kicking in?

At least I read the whole conversation before I respond.....while you're too ****ing lazy and wind up looking like as ass as a result.

Maybe YOU would like to forget TKO6 but I'll guarantee you I'll never let that happen. If you had BOTHERED to read the whole conversation it would have been obvious to even a d1ckhead like you that the subject was POST comeback Vitali. So either you're either a windowlicker who has no reading comprehension or you're a lazy twat who can't be arsed brush up on what he's shooting off his jizz receptacle over.

Either way you look like an idiot.

[Poet682006]

Quit your lying, I already did a breakdown on three of Louis' lesser opponents showing they in FACT fought more top 10 fighters than ANY of Vittles opponents have. You of course chose to ignore that like you will this. You can't handle the truth!!

Post 234 in this very thread...Should I get into the better fighters next?

Just for fun and because his resume has taken some flak on this forum lately I decided to show exactly why Vittles Klitschko's resume is very WEAK.

Randomly I picked out 3 names off of Joe Louis' resume as champion. I made sure to pick moderate names and not the best to better be able to prove my point that Vits resume stinks because the fighters he fought have proven very little against other top fighters.

Bob Pastor

Jimmy Bivins
Gus Lesnivich
Tami Mauriello
Billy Conn
Al McCoy
Gus Dorazio
Lee Ramage
Lou Nova

Tami Mauriello

Gus Lesnivich
Gunner Barlund
Bob Pastor
Red Burman
Jimmy Bivins
Lou Nova
Lee Savold

Cesar Brion

Lasrarza
Mauriello
Layne
Lowry

All fighters named were in the top 10 during, shortly before or shortly after fighting Louis.

All these fights against one another came within a couple of years before or after fighting Louis. They are proven commodities and that isn't even getting into the better fighters on Joes record.

Now...would anyone like to explain how Vits comp are proven commodities, or should we just call his resume good and him an ATG because you say so?

Edit: Louis wan't champion when he fought Brion. But you get the point.

Thank you very much! I now fully expect that he'll ignore that post as Klitlickers are only interested in "The Facts" that they pull straight out of their anuses :chuckle9:

[JAB5239]

Quit your lying, I already did a breakdown on three of Louis' lesser opponents showing they in FACT fought more top 10 fighters than ANY of Vittles opponents have. You of course chose to ignore that like you will this. You can't handle the truth!!

Post 234 in this very thread...Should I get into the better fighters next?

Just for fun and because his resume has taken some flak on this forum lately I decided to show exactly why Vittles Klitschko's resume is very WEAK.

Randomly I picked out 3 names off of Joe Louis' resume as champion. I made sure to pick moderate names and not the best to better be able to prove my point that Vits resume stinks because the fighters he fought have proven very little against other top fighters.

Bob Pastor

Jimmy Bivins
Gus Lesnivich
Tami Mauriello
Billy Conn
Al McCoy
Gus Dorazio
Lee Ramage
Lou Nova

Tami Mauriello

Gus Lesnivich
Gunner Barlund
Bob Pastor
Red Burman
Jimmy Bivins
Lou Nova
Lee Savold

Cesar Brion

Lasrarza
Mauriello
Layne
Lowry

All fighters named were in the top 10 during, shortly before or shortly after fighting Louis.

All these fights against one another came within a couple of years before or after fighting Louis. They are proven commodities and that isn't even getting into the better fighters on Joes record.

Now...would anyone like to explain how Vits comp are proven commodities, or should we just call his resume good and him an ATG because you say so?

Edit: Louis wan't champion when he fought Brion. But you get the point.

Nearly 45 min and still no response. Kliterati hate facts!

[Poet682006]

Nearly 45 min and still no response. Kliterati hate facts!

Bu bu bu but they LOVE "The Facts" :hahahaha9: