Comments Thread For: Weighing 168 - BoxingScene’s Pound for Pound Top Ten

[dorruel2.0]

Well there is nothing that can be done about. Time to buy a bridge and get over it.

no because the RING, yeah you know, the only rankings that matter have him at 7. IMO thats being nice, but im happy with that

[B.U.R.N.E.R]

Cliff Rold's Knowledge > NSB

[B.U.R.N.E.R]

no because the RING, yeah you know, the only rankings that matter have him at 7. IMO thats being nice, but im happy with that

Nothing wrong with 7.

Most of the fighters on the rings list shouldnt even be there.

Hopkins
Cab
JMM
Mosley

So Paul is really 4 spots higher....at 3.

[dorruel2.0]

Cliff Rold's Knowledge > NSB

i doubt Rold ever laced a pair, wheras I, and probably many NSB users have. **** I guess you think brian kenny, and and that fatass Dan rafael know absolutely everything about boxing as well.
Not really feeling your logic my man

[dorruel2.0]

Nothing wrong with 7.

Most of the fighters on the rings list shouldnt even be there.

Hopkins
Cab
JMM
Mosley

So Paul is really 4 spots higher....at 3.

JMM,, Mosley lost to imo the best pound for pound fighter, thers no shame in that, and shouldnt be kicked out of the top 10 for that alone. Marquez was #2 before he fought Floyd, you really think he doesnt belong on the list. I agree with cab and hopkins tho, and nothing is wrong with 7 as well

[Spray_resistant]

Hell yeah, but heavies shouldnt be on this list

Then what about guys like Haye or Adamek?

So it was ok for them to be on the list before when the were in a different division and now its not even though neither has "gotten bigger" as some ppl seem to think grown men that age can do?

What about Eddie Chambers? It wasn't ok for him to be on a list just because he was fatter while fighting as a HW and now it will be ok because he is competing at CW?

Also take into account that Adamek and Haye are both bigger guys than Eddie really.

PPL really have to think more about these things.

[dorruel2.0]

Then what about guys like Haye or Adamek?

So it was ok for them to be on the list before when the were in a different division and now its not even though neither has "gotten bigger" as some ppl seem to think grown men that age can do?

What about Eddie Chambers? It wasn't ok for him to be on a list just because he was fatter while fighting as a HW and now it will be ok because he is competing at CW?

Also take into account that Adamek and Haye are both bigger guys than Eddie really.

PPL really have to think more about these things.

Hayes resume isnt all that great, cut if Ademik wins a title at heavie. He deff deserves to be up there. Im not saying that fighting at heavy automaticly means you cant be obn the list. But the division is so weak that noone in the division at the moment deserves to be on it.

[Walt Liquor]

I dont like Heavies on P4P Lists. The heavyweight division and all the fighters except one are **** anyway.

Vitali looked shot in his last fight. Wlad is good. But hs not one of the best 10 in the world.

Makes no sense.

First off Adamek is NOT ****. He was a force at LHW (probably the second best fighter there at the time), was the best cruiser, and now has beaten a legit heavy. If that's not PFP material I don' know what is. Certainly done more PFP that someone like Andre Ward or Lucian Bute.

Second off, If Chad Dawson wins his next fight, goes to Cruiser and beats Cunningham, then goes to heavy and takes Haye's title, would you then exclude him from PFP. Don't duck this one Burner.

[Walt Liquor]

Hayes resume isnt all that great, cut if Ademik wins a title at heavie. He deff deserves to be up there. Im not saying that fighting at heavy automaticly means you cant be obn the list. But the division is so weak that noone in the division at the moment deserves to be on it.

Adamek was the second best fighter at LHW, best at CW and now a force at Heavy. That's the definition of PFP.

How many others can you say that for save Pwill, Sergio, Floyd, and Manny for on that list.

[Tiozzo]

Paul Will at no. 3............................