Comments Thread For: Who Would Have Won A Clash Between De La Hoya and Canelo?

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • GrandpaBernard
    Banned
    Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
    • May 2010
    • 17156
    • 4,480
    • 2,947
    • 114,399

    #61
    Two guys who didn’t win convincingly in their big fights more often than not

    tough fight to call

    probably rematch or trilogy with the judges favoring Alvarez

    Comment

    • HandsofIron
      Super Champion in Recess
      Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
      • Jul 2014
      • 3945
      • 734
      • 765
      • 25,198

      #62
      Originally posted by TheOneAboveAll

      You’re one of the few fans I’ve heard argue that Canelo’s loss to Floyd ruined his career and legacy. Most knowledgeable fans watched Canelo become vastly improved by that experience.
      It ruined his legacy on a ATG/P4P/Prime scale, you know rankings and whatnot.

      Career, experience and cash wise, he's done exceptionally well for himself, rather impressive actually for his age compared to others.

      Comment

      • GhostofDempsey
        Undisputed Champion
        Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
        • Mar 2017
        • 31376
        • 12,955
        • 8,610
        • 493,602

        #63
        Oscar at 154, possibly Canelo at 160 but it's close.

        Comment

        • El_Maldito_Rey
          Undisputed Champion
          Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
          • Jan 2021
          • 3947
          • 2,043
          • 571
          • 5,180

          #64
          Oscar ****** at 154 and above. Especially when he was hitting the coke hard.

          In a mythical P4P matchup, where they’re both at their best, Oscar beats him sure. But a 154 pound Oscar that lost all his big fights or even the Oscar that beat Vargas, Canelo beats him bad.

          and Canelo would’ve mauled Vargas too, he would’ve beat him worse than Trinidad.

          Comment

          • JakeTheBoxer
            undisputed champion
            Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
            • Dec 2014
            • 21125
            • 4,619
            • 2,797
            • 123,960

            #65
            Originally posted by FinitoxDinamita
            Oscar beats him. Canelo is not on his level.
            Again..at what weight?

            Yeah prime lightweight Oscar beats 15 old Canelo .

            But at 168 Canelo beats every version of Oscar.

            Comment

            • TheOneAboveAll
              Supreme Arbiter
              Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
              • Jun 2022
              • 2534
              • 1,487
              • 1,628
              • 0

              #66
              Originally posted by HandsofIron

              It ruined his legacy on a ATG/P4P/Prime scale, you know rankings and whatnot.

              Career, experience and cash wise, he's done exceptionally well for himself, rather impressive actually for his age compared to others.
              Some might say so, but I would disagree. Virtually none of the consensus ATGs in this sport finished their careers without a loss. A loss to one of the very best to ever do it is no real blemish. Too many fighters today are labeled great having never fought a great fighter. Sharing the ring with Mayweather, even in defeat, is a plus for Canelo's all-time ranking.

              Comment

              • daggum
                All time great
                Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                • Feb 2008
                • 43562
                • 4,590
                • 3
                • 166,270

                #67
                Originally posted by El_Maldito_Rey
                Oscar ****** at 154 and above. Especially when he was hitting the coke hard.

                In a mythical P4P matchup, where they’re both at their best, Oscar beats him sure. But a 154 pound Oscar that lost all his big fights or even the Oscar that beat Vargas, Canelo beats him bad.

                and Canelo would’ve mauled Vargas too, he would’ve beat him worse than Trinidad.
                oscar ****** at 160 but he was very good at 154 during his prime. he beat castallejo, vargas, and mosley in the rematch(robbery) all those guys were top 5 fighters.

                Comment

                • daggum
                  All time great
                  Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                  • Feb 2008
                  • 43562
                  • 4,590
                  • 3
                  • 166,270

                  #68
                  Originally posted by TheOneAboveAll

                  Some might say so, but I would disagree. Virtually none of the consensus ATGs in this sport finished their careers without a loss. A loss to one of the very best to ever do it is no real blemish. Too many fighters today are labeled great having never fought a great fighter. Sharing the ring with Mayweather, even in defeat, is a plus for Canelo's all-time ranking.
                  he looked so terrible that its hard to say its a plus. i know he was completely drained so the fight doesnt really count for much for either guy, but it certainly cant be seen as a positive for canelo. if he had lost a close fight maybe but he didnt.

                  Comment

                  • TheOneAboveAll
                    Supreme Arbiter
                    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                    • Jun 2022
                    • 2534
                    • 1,487
                    • 1,628
                    • 0

                    #69
                    Originally posted by LAchargers373

                    lol k he not a bum but you get what I’m saying right? GGG career fell quite short of what it should’ve been. Wasted his whole career chasing canelo and like it or not didn’t even get a win out of it. Kell Brook is his only elite win and Brook was a WW.
                    I do agree that GGG became obsessed with beating Canelo and allowed himself to get strung along during a part of his career where he could have had other important legacy fights, but it is what it is. I regard GGG as one of the very top fighters of his generation. He should have two wins over the former P4P #1 guy in the sport, and he absolutely leveled every other MW contender that was in his way as he broke the record for MW defenses. He didn't fight bums, but rather the best the were available. Like a true elite champion, he blitzed them all. It was only in his final years that that GGG showed slippage, against other top shelf fighters (Deryvyanchenko, Canelo). In my view, when evaluating careers, its always important to note which elite opponents of his era a fighter faced, then second, which elite fighters of his era he did not face. We know his opponents faced, but which elite fighters (in his weight class) did GGG not face?

                    Comment

                    • El_Maldito_Rey
                      Undisputed Champion
                      Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                      • Jan 2021
                      • 3947
                      • 2,043
                      • 571
                      • 5,180

                      #70
                      Originally posted by daggum

                      oscar ****** at 160 but he was very good at 154 during his prime. he beat castallejo, vargas, and mosley in the rematch(robbery) all those guys were top 5 fighters.
                      Castillejo was a euro bum, Vargas was ruined by Tito and china chinned, and Mosley was always a PED cheating bum who should’ve had all his wins wiped out .

                      and like I said post 2000 Oscar was heavy on coke that he wouldn’t have beaten Canelo.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP