Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Is Calzaghe the Greatest of All Time?

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Originally posted by Wiley Hyena View Post
    There's a case to be made for either boxer in a quality match up. But, it's a little hypocritical to say RJJ would destroy Joe, and then after he lost to say that RJJ was just a washed up old man.
    I picked Joe to win the fight by UD decision, he did.

    I pick Jones by a semi-wide UD in a prime for prime match-up, he would.

    I think the percentage split on the last poll on a prime matchup between them was about 83-17. I think that is a reasonably accurate representation of the relative chances of the two fighters.

    Comment


    • Originally posted by bsrizpac View Post
      No I didn't I said Roy would lose since this fight was signed. I've been saying Roy was shot on here since 04.

      Try again.

      A LOT of people said Floyd was ducking Hatton until he fought him. So how does that not make sense again?

      Idiot.
      Hey idiot. I never said Mayweather dodged Hatton. In fact, if you go back and actually read what I wrote you'll find that I initially said Mayweather would win the fight. I changed my mind after the fight was made.

      Comment


      • Originally posted by danc1984 View Post
        I picked Joe to win the fight by UD decision, he did.

        I pick Jones by a semi-wide UD in a prime for prime match-up, he would.

        I think the percentage split on the last poll on a prime matchup between them was about 83-17. I think that is a reasonably accurate representation of the relative chances of the two fighters.
        Maybe. Maybe not. But, I can argue that 17%. Calzaghe always surprises.

        Comment


        • Originally posted by K-Nan View Post
          That is not defense, its reflexes. He sees punches very well.

          Edit: As for the threadstarter's question- I don't really know what the objective of the question is, but no. Just... no.
          Reflexes and vision all add up when talking about Calzaghe's defense.

          Comment


          • definitely not, he is not even #1 p4p right now.

            Comment


            • Eubank was weight drained
              Lacy best win was over (insert no name fighter)
              Kessler was a good win, yet til to this day he is unproven
              Hopkins he has a case he won that fight and people agree
              RJJ was shot

              Comment


              • Originally posted by kenso View Post
                definitely not, he is not even #1 p4p right now.
                I set up this thread simply to give the Pros and Cons of an admittedly controversial proposition. It's interesting that the response of Calzaghe's detractors are, for the most part, enraged to the point of hatred. What's up with all that? Is it the mere fact that he's British??

                Comment


                • Originally posted by Wiley Hyena View Post
                  I set up this thread simply to give the Pros and Cons of an admittedly controversial proposition. It's interesting that the response of Calzaghe's detractors are, for the most part, enraged to the point of hatred. What's up with all that? Is it the mere fact that he's British??
                  How is that an absurdly angry post?

                  He just said that The Ring, a respected authority on boxing knowledge has him at #3... and that is only gaging him against fighters who are currently fighting.

                  So people like Roberto Duran, Henry Armstrong, Tommy Hearns, Pernell Whitaker, Ray Leonard, Ray Robinson, Harry Greb, Jou Loius and Muhammad Ali are not included in that criteria that has him back at #3.

                  I would think that point is valid to the point that it deserves more of a response than... HATER! YOU HATE THE BRITISH!

                  Comment


                  • Originally posted by DWiens421 View Post
                    How is that an absurdly angry post?

                    He just said that The Ring, a respected authority on boxing knowledge has him at #3... and that is only gaging him against fighters who are currently fighting.

                    So people like Roberto Duran, Henry Armstrong, Tommy Hearns, Pernell Whitaker, Ray Leonard, Ray Robinson, Harry Greb, Jou Loius and Muhammad Ali are not included in that criteria that has him back at #3.

                    I would think that point is valid to the point that it deserves more of a response than... HATER! YOU HATE THE BRITISH!
                    I was talking about the majority of responses from Calzaghe detractors in this thread. Just wondering why all the vitriol.

                    Comment


                    • Originally posted by Flawless 2 View Post
                      Eubank was weight drained
                      Lacy best win was over (insert no name fighter)
                      Kessler was a good win, yet til to this day he is unproven
                      Hopkins he has a case he won that fight and people agree
                      RJJ was shot
                      Excuses. Excuses are like *&$holes. Everybody's got one.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP