What is Mike Tyson's prime anyway?? How can someone's prime only last from ages 20-24??
When you are a grown man at the age of 16 your prime ends at 24, it's understandable.
I know it wouldnt of suited his style but did prime tyson have the feet to be fleet footed, to be able to get up on his toes and dance around the ring like ali ?
Actually the Crusier wgt div was starting to heat up at the time, some members here called me out on that. I acknowledged it. It was an oversight on my part.
It made a rapid progress in two years didn't it?
Fury will slip and counter everything Wilder throws at him and then drop him.
:lol1:
I mean I don't mind if he does but I just can't see it, Fury ruined his health in past 3 years.
Fat boy McDermott beat the ***** outta Fury.
He got robbed...
Yeah that was close fight, that shows Fury is perhaps the most overrated boxer in history.
Joe Louis didn't have the tools, the ability Tyson has.
Defeating the undisputed reigning champ for 11 years is historic and worthy of praise.
Joe Louis didn't use steroids like Fury and didn't duck others like Fury.
:lol1:
Just listen to yourselves. Already losing sleep over Furys greatness.
Always funny when people resort to how a close fight means a guy is overrated.
No, he is overrated because of fangirls like you who try to spread myth that he's a second coming of Joe Luis while he did nothing so far to deserve any recognition in boxing history, facts.
Floyd was scared of real drug agency called VADA.
He only has Floyd style drug testing were in he tries to say its like Olympic style drug testing when it actually isn't since it since it isn't year round like he projects it to be.. and the best part since it is not year round. His testing helps him cycle his Peds. The funny thind is he still got caught sticking IVs before a fight when he should have enough time cycling his peds during his vacations.
http://i.imgur.com/rxPYIvm.jpg?1
Yes it's all facts, Floyd is a drug cheat, everybody knows that.
...that tries to belittle what the upcoming fight will mean career-wise.
Now that the Fury-Wilder fight is a done deal set to go off this November or December, some of you have observed how Fury will probably not be the same guy that beat Wlad to become the lineal.
Fair enough.
This makes sense and I agree.
However, I am hoping that the same folks making this observation were also saying the same thing about the AJ-Klitschko fight before that happened.
I hope those who seek to belittle what a win by Wilder over Tyson might mean also talk about how AJ fought a diminished Wlad.
Because the truth is, Fury will likely be more ready for his fight with Wilder than Wlad was vs Joshua.
Klitschko had looked bad going back 2 years and had zero tuneups before AJ.
Tyson will have had 2 fights before Wilder.
Now, there is no denying Wlad did look pretty good vs AJ.
But the truth is, we don't know if that was due to a "good" version of Wlad or due to an inexperienced AJ...and really, we still may not know.
Who has AJ fought since again?
A Takam that just got flattened by DelBoy (God Bless him!)?
A Parker that looked very ordinary vs Whyte, who is pretty ordinary himself?
So, when it comes to rating a potential Wilder win over Fury, please be objective enough to keep all this in mind.
LOL what a bunch of bollocks :lol1: