Comments Thread For: Wilder-Fury II: The End To The Lineal Championship Debate

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Marchegiano
    Banned
    Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
    • Aug 2010
    • 12208
    • 1,790
    • 2,307
    • 165,288

    #21
    Originally posted by RJJ-94-02=GOAT
    Not how it works.

    Unluckeeeeeee....������
    Well, from the right perspective it is.

    Fury's lineage claims rests on the idea Wlad was lineal which itself is pinned to the idea that the number one ranked man can fight the number two ranked man to prove he is the lineal.

    Lineal is a title that is meant to existed since Sullivan. Ranks do not exist in Sullivan's time. Who added the idea that rank has anything to do with lineal? Ring Magazine, a source that can't enforce anything to do with lineal status but has taken great pains to conflate lineal with themselves.

    Beyond TBRB's very existence being a black eye for Ring, there is the fact that their founder is a plagiarist and liar. A man whose works range from reprinting other's work and claiming it for his own to just making **** up.


    If you look to Sullivan's era there's a few thing a lineal must do to be lineal. First they must claim it, something no has done since the bodies took over with the exception of Tyson Fury and those that followed him, the other thing they must do is take on all legitimate challengers. Not ranked, not top ranked, all legitimate challengers. Who decides legitimacy? The champion does, it's called champion's prerogative. Who checks champions from giving themselves only easy fights? Past champions of course but above all else public support.

    So what we have from Sullivan's era point of view is a situation where there are three claimants. Wilder claims to be the champion based on his WBC title, Joshua claims to be champion based on his WBA-S,IBF, and WBO titles, and Fury claims it based off man who beat the man who was the man as per a ranking board

    None of these men have done anything to adhere to lineal prior to sanctioning bodies, all of them require sanctioning bodies to exist to make their claim. If you require some form of body or culture that came from bodies to make you claim to lineal how can you possibly be adhering to the principles of lineal? Simple answer is you aren't.

    Tyson has to beat everyone with a legitimate claim to champion to be the lineal. His first step was claiming it, not beating Wlad, Wlad did not take on all challengers nor did Wlad ever claim lineal.

    Wilder, Joshua, they've not even claimed lineal, they have nothing to do with it presently.


    The only actual connection to lineal tyson Fury has beyond the claim is his fan base and public perception of his claim. Who checks the champion? The public more than anything. If the public says Fury is lineal he is lineal regardless of him having done nothing relative to boxing without sanctioning bodies. If the public believes #1 vs #2 solves a lineal vacancy then it does.....even if Sullivan through Burns knows nothing about ranks and Johnson and Willard didn't give a **** about them.

    Sure, it makes Ring, CBZ, LBC, and TBRB all look like inconsistent ****s who make **** up to fit the narrative they want to push at the time when you look at any of their lists of lineals, but, that is what they actually are. Just some *******s who make **** up and spread that lie until it's believed.

    You might wonder, if there was no ranking or consideration toward ranking how did the title pass in vacancy? The champion would announce the two fighter for the title he is vacating. Often their star pupil against the public favorite. How did Jeffries pass his title to Hart? He put together a match with his guy Jack Root and when Hart won awarded the title to Hart. Not done a single time in the era of bodies because, like I said before, from Dempsey to Tyson no one gave a **** until Tyson made it matter again.

    It is reborn in Fury's image if you like. Because the fans believe him he is lineal.


    Edit- sorry, forgot to say. All you have to do is not give a **** about fan belief or made up nonsense from journals that have never had any integrity to see Fury as just another claimant.

    Comment

    • Shadoww702
      Banned
      Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
      • Sep 2015
      • 41176
      • 4,546
      • 2,938
      • 250,035

      #22
      As an ex boxer I never liked fighting a power puncher twice because they saw most of my moves the 1st time. I can do a few things different but if they good??? My better speed, experience, and skills wouldn’t matter. High risk-low reward

      Comment

      • MEXICAN STYLE
        Undisputed Champion
        Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
        • Jul 2019
        • 1196
        • 41
        • 216
        • 17,026

        #23
        Originally posted by Shadoww702
        That’s my bet.

        Fury don’t throw a lot so Wilder could never get the timing down. A 2nd fight gives him that much more... Plus new TRAINER??? And doing all this WWF and MMA??? I’m doubling down.

        I still think this fight does not happen on time.
        Nicely said btw Ruiz changed Boxing ever since he destroyed Joshua the 1st time for example Charlo was looking to incapacitate Harrison so did Pacquiao against Keith Thurman & other fights I don't remember so the judges don't have a say in it

        Wilder knows he can't outbox T Fury so he will try to put Tyson F to sleep or @ least drop him a bunch of times to get a clear win

        Comment

        • £-4-£
          Liverpool FC
          Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
          • Jul 2009
          • 2750
          • 165
          • 319
          • 28,401

          #24
          Originally posted by Kezzer
          I don’t agree that Tyson fury is lineal at the moment nor that This fight is definitely #1 vs #2. Many consider it #2 vs #3.

          So given that it’s clearly differing views - I won’t be recognising anyone as lineal until either they have beaten or been defeated by Anthony Joshua.
          I'm an AJ fan, I was at the Klitschko fight. But Fury beat him and has gone undefeated since, besting Wilder already.

          AJ definitely has a chance against both and I'd be supporting him in those fights, but I believe currently that this is a 1 v. 2 fight. So if Fury isn't already considered lineal then this should confirm it, whoever wins. But there is a big asterix over the lineage if the winner of the rubber match doesn't fight AJ in 2021.

          Comment

          • Eff Pandas
            Banned
            Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
            • Apr 2012
            • 52129
            • 3,624
            • 2,147
            • 1,635,919

            #25
            Isn't there a argument Fury isn't the lineal champ cuz of how long he didn't fight for? So idk if the rematch is the end of that discussion or not.

            Comment

            • £-4-£
              Liverpool FC
              Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
              • Jul 2009
              • 2750
              • 165
              • 319
              • 28,401

              #26
              Originally posted by Shadoww702
              As an ex boxer I never liked fighting a power puncher twice because they saw most of my moves the 1st time. I can do a few things different but if they good??? My better speed, experience, and skills wouldn’t matter. High risk-low reward
              I respect your take though in Fury's case it's high risk - high reward.

              Winner gets 60% in the rubber match and if he wins that there's the AJ undisputed fight at Wembley, 90k fans and millions in PPV - biggest fight in UK history.

              And also his MMA career!

              Comment

              • Cool Scant
                Undisputed Champion
                Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                • Oct 2014
                • 1114
                • 109
                • 37
                • 27,271

                #27
                Originally posted by Kezzer
                Lineal won’t be decided until the belts are undisputed. End of.
                You’re trying to keep Joshua relevant... he’s not. End of.

                Comment

                • Cool Scant
                  Undisputed Champion
                  Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                  • Oct 2014
                  • 1114
                  • 109
                  • 37
                  • 27,271

                  #28
                  Originally posted by Kezzer
                  I don’t agree that Tyson fury is lineal at the moment nor that This fight is definitely #1 vs #2. Many consider it #2 vs #3.

                  So given that it’s clearly differing views - I won’t be recognising anyone as lineal until either they have beaten or been defeated by Anthony Joshua.
                  just like I suspected... trying to keep Joshua Relevent. He’s not. End of.

                  Comment

                  • Nomadic
                    Undisputed Champion
                    Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                    • Mar 2013
                    • 5533
                    • 226
                    • 970
                    • 28,516

                    #29
                    Originally posted by Roberto Vasquez
                    No-one cares or has ever cared about the Lineal champ. It's the sort of thing you boast about when you have no real belts and when you haven't beaten anyone good in 4 years

                    Seriously if Wilder wins it I hope he puts it in the garbage. The Ring belt is worth way more than the Lineal belt.
                    Let's emphasize on the "considered" part. I know it ain't one, but that's what they say to make Fury relevant before each of his bout.

                    Comment

                    • Nomadic
                      Undisputed Champion
                      Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                      • Mar 2013
                      • 5533
                      • 226
                      • 970
                      • 28,516

                      #30
                      Originally posted by Shadoww702
                      Everyone knows AJ at best is the 3rd best Heavyweight.

                      Even though he beat Fatboy that still was a BAD look RUNNING from him every round.

                      And needing an Xtra HUGE ring??? Even proved it.

                      In case you don’t know AJ DEMANDED a 22’ x 22’ ring.

                      The standard biggest one is 20’ x 20’...

                      Anywhere from 16’ - 20’ is normal.
                      I always considered AJ as a puppet champ. They cherry picked Ruiz and it went bad for them. But don't go telling AJ fans that! They tend to lash out at you.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP