Comments Thread For: Wilder-Fury II: The End To The Lineal Championship Debate

[Roberto Vasquez]

It was a ****** and irrelevant question... as none of these guys will ever fight anywhere near 10 times you utter r-tard...

Wilder-Fury is a 50/50 fight, so it would probably be around 6-4 to Fury or 5-5 based off the first fight.

Both guys are evidently better than AJ and beat him pretty comfortably, I’d say 9-1 or as it’s HW boxing maybe 8-2 to Wilder/Fury.

Talking of “fanboyism”. Price admits Fury WAS NOT ducking him. You still can’t accept it.😂

Both Hearn’s acknowledge the 50m was legitimate. You still can’t accept it.🤣

There’s only one fanboy here and it’s you, you sad little c***.

You showed your fanboy-ism when you said Wilder beats AJ 9-1. And it would be 8-2 to Fury. Simply because if you are a Fury fan you have to accept Wilder is equal and vice-versa but you can ignore AJ because he is a "Hearn promoted hype-job".

So if Wilder does beat AJ 9 times out of 10. Why didnt he fight AJ instead of Ortiz and potentially get himself all the belts? and in doing so stick it to AJ and Hearn once and for all?

If Fury beats AJ 8 times out of 10 why is Fury fighting opponents outside the top-20. Why didn't he just fight AJ straight away and get a load of real belts?

None of your arguments and opinions make any sense when subjected to scrutiny. If that was true both Wilder and Fury would be fighting AJ rather than each other. The truth is Fury was a big name and was thought to bring little threat after being fat and retired for 2 years

Why would I accept Wilder offered 50 million dollars? when it made no business sense then. and when Wilder later refused an AJ fight (where he didn't have to offer him 50 million) to fight Ortiz again(!)

It was just a clever move to keep the fanboys happy.

[RJJ-94-02=GOAT]

You showed your fanboy-ism when you said Wilder beats AJ 9-1. And it would be 8-2 to Fury. Simply because if you are a Fury fan you have to accept Wilder is equal and vice-versa but you can ignore AJ because he is a "Hearn promoted hype-job".

So if Wilder does beat AJ 9 times out of 10. Why didnt he fight AJ instead of Ortiz and potentially get himself all the belts? and in doing so stick it to AJ and Hearn once and for all?

If Fury beats AJ 8 times out of 10 why is Fury fighting opponents outside the top-20. Why didn't he just fight AJ straight away and get a load of real belts?

None of your arguments and opinions make any sense when subjected to scrutiny. If that was true both Wilder and Fury would be fighting AJ rather than each other. The truth is Fury was a big name and was thought to bring little threat after being fat and retired for 2 years

Why would I accept Wilder offered 50 million dollars? when it made no business sense then. and when Wilder later refused an AJ fight (where he didn't have to offer him 50 million) to fight Ortiz again(!)

It was just a clever move to keep the fanboys happy.

I’m not even reading your sh** anymore.

Get a life you sad c***...

[Roberto Vasquez]

I’m not even reading your sh** anymore.

Get a life you sad c***...

When fanboys get exposed...

[RJJ-94-02=GOAT]

When fanboys get exposed...

Indeed...

Get a life you sad c***.

[Slimpack]

You argument is illogical

I'm sorry but out the top 3 heavies no way is a guy who got beat by a small fat man a lineal champion. Did you see how he ran in the rematch in that massive ring? Is that how a lineal champion behaves?

Joshua 'boxed' not "ran"! You don't amass such a huge point on the score card by running. He used his jab, moved well for 12 rounds and avoid being hit by Ruiz- pure boxing!

We all know AJ can brawl and fight. He has done that severally in the past (against Wlad, Whyte, Brazeale, etc), but for the Ruiz fight it would be dangerous trading with a shorter guy that is stout and fast.

People like you only want to see him lose.