Joshua V Wilder: What do YOU think would be fair?
Collapse
-
-
Comment
-
Thank you for your opinion.
Stiverne and Ortiz were both considered top 3 fighters by the world's leading experts when Wilder beat them. AJ has never fought a consensus top 3 fighter.
AJ is a great fighter, I have him ranked #1 at heavyweight for a reason. But his handlers have conveniently avoided the biggest punchers in the division. As they should. Wilder went out of his way to target Ortiz, just to challenge and prove himself. That should be applauded.Comment
-
Comment
-
You answers your own question with the Perfect Answer:
More than FAIR and that is the "Revised Offer" that should be made and if that is rejected then yes Eddie will have legit reasons to say "Wilder Doesn't Want The Fight!" and Move On!I feel like 60/40 AJ and fight is at Wembley, and rematch for Wilder on same terms in his favour in a USA rematch if he wins in UK.Comment
-
Comment
-
Comment
-
Come on man, Joshua fought Klitschko in his 19th fight - his 19th fight! Wilder didn't "challenge himself" by fighting Ortiz until after 40 fights and 3 years of being champion. How can you keep calling yourself neutral and unbiased when you keep writing this stuff!Stiverne and Ortiz were both considered top 3 fighters by the world's leading experts when Wilder beat them. AJ has never fought a consensus top 3 fighter.
AJ is a great fighter, I have him ranked #1 at heavyweight for a reason. But his handlers have conveniently avoided the biggest punchers in the division. As they should. Wilder went out of his way to target Ortiz, just to challenge and prove himself. That should be applauded.Comment
-
Comment
-
how on earth does wilder deserve 40 percent, its ridiculous. just look at the differences in their recent purses.Comment
Comment