Joshua V Wilder: What do YOU think would be fair?

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Froch_uppercut
    Undisputed Champion
    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
    • Jan 2015
    • 1572
    • 120
    • 12
    • 40,630

    #21
    Originally posted by Ray*
    At this stage its definitely an easy win for both, commercially it would be a great win for Wilder. His resume would look better, he would be selling his first PPVs etc
    Absolutely. Fury looks like a good scalp but he’s a mess who was elevated to Ali status prematurely on the back of one good win.

    Wilder beating him is like anyone beating Man Utd these days: looks good on paper but the reality is it’s a W against a shambolic opponent

    Comment

    • Kezzer
      Undisputed Champion
      Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
      • Dec 2017
      • 3480
      • 116
      • 35
      • 58,969

      #22
      60-40 is generous from AJ. Wilder wouldn’t make anywhere near that with even fury. So it comes down to whether wilder is really greedy for more money or backs himself.

      Comment

      • Froch_uppercut
        Undisputed Champion
        Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
        • Jan 2015
        • 1572
        • 120
        • 12
        • 40,630

        #23
        Originally posted by davef
        Imo Wilder has to fight Whyte, and then Dave Allen in a super fight to see who faces AJ
        Whyte would be the best name on Wilder’s resume, but he wet his pants when someone suggested he should fight Whyte.

        Comment

        • pillowfists98
          The Takeover 2020
          Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
          • Jun 2018
          • 6685
          • 148
          • 81
          • 93,444

          #24
          65-35 is fair. 60-40 if the PPV with Fury really exceeds expectations.

          Comment

          • Roberto Vasquez
            Undisputed Champion
            Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
            • Jul 2013
            • 3999
            • 740
            • 139
            • 46,352

            #25
            Lets be honest Wilder is a bum with a huge punch. He's never fought anyone dangerous his whole career. AJ hasn't ducked anyone. AJ can dictate terms - he has 3 belts.

            As for Fury. If he was serious he wouldn't have gone straight from 2 nobody opponents to Wilder. He would have fought a half-decent heavyweight first. Fury is just another easy opponent for Wilder to KO. Fury has no power and has to avoid getting hit for 12 rounds. No chance.

            Comment

            • New England
              Strong champion.
              Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
              • Oct 2010
              • 37514
              • 1,926
              • 1,486
              • 97,173

              #26
              60 40 for joshua is very fair for a fight in wembley.

              fightmakes more money in the US.

              Comment

              • bluebeam
                Undisputed Champion
                Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                • Feb 2009
                • 3839
                • 121
                • 0
                • 31,012

                #27
                Originally posted by Froch_uppercut
                They each have something the other wants, but AJ has multiple belts, makes considerably more money, and has a far better resume.

                I feel like 60/40 AJ and fight is at Wembley, and rematch for Wilder on same terms in his favour in a USA rematch if he wins in UK.

                What would be fair here?


                That's what wilder asked for right out the gate and hearn said no.

                **** AJ.

                Let him figjt dillan whyte again.

                Comment

                • iamboxing
                  ******a facking game
                  Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                  • Dec 2016
                  • 6421
                  • 672
                  • 760
                  • 29,458

                  #28
                  Originally posted by DramaShow
                  In terms of star power and what they bring to the table financially based on past earnings? 75/25 in favour of Joshua. Matchroom sports is a business, if you start overpaying opponents then every fighter is going to be greedy and demand more.
                  75/25....? Hearn might as well offer Wilder his middle finger, less insulting

                  Comment

                  • iamboxing
                    ******a facking game
                    Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                    • Dec 2016
                    • 6421
                    • 672
                    • 760
                    • 29,458

                    #29
                    Originally posted by bluebeam
                    That's what wilder asked for right out the gate and hearn said no.

                    **** AJ.

                    Let him figjt dillan whyte again.
                    Whyte vs AJ is what the public wants. Fight of the century.

                    Comment

                    • BoxingTech718
                      Undisputed Champion
                      Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                      • May 2010
                      • 4646
                      • 300
                      • 217
                      • 25,563

                      #30
                      Depends on what the Wilder vs Fury PPV does and who wins

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP