Joshua V Wilder: What do YOU think would be fair?
Collapse
-
-
At this stage its definitely an easy win for both, commercially it would be a great win for Wilder. His resume would look better, he would be selling his first PPVs etcI think Fury is an easy win for either Wilder or AJ, so don’t really think it should add that much to his body of work - but **** it, as a fan I just want it to happen. I am starting to understand that a Fury win can really throw things off, but can’t see that happening thankfully.Comment
-
Comment
-
This.
I hate the financials, I hate reading about them, I hate people arguing them. I don’t want to play armchair promoter I just want to watch the best damn fights possible and this is the best fight possible at HW
That said, I’ll immediatky contradict myself to answer OP’s question. I think 60/40 would get the fight doneComment
-
It depends on Wilder beating Fury, how he looks doing it and how much money that fight makes. As it stands now, I think a 70-30 split in Joshua's favor is fair if the fight were to happen in the US, or 55-45 in Joshua's favor if it were to happen in the UK. This is assuming there's no funny business with official selections, rematch clauses, and options on the fighters.
But like I said, I think it could change after the Wilder/Fury fight.Comment
-
A one time 50/50 split, champion vs champion for the undisputed and lineal titles. 60/40 for the winner in the rematch. After that, it's mandatory season (75/25) for whatever belts have not been stripped, until he loses or until the next unification...Comment
Comment