Joshua V Wilder: What do YOU think would be fair?

[sicko]

how on earth does wilder deserve 40 percent, its ridiculous. just look at the differences in their recent purses.

How on EARTH did Charles Martin Deserve an ALLEGED "£8 Million GBP"

Providing he beat Fury and that PPV does well...which is not a Given

When you have a Rich Fight Brewing like that everybody has to be PAID WELL to make it happen and I don't expect either side to take anything less to get the fight done. THIS is why Promoters sometimes give us the run around to assure that when they do the fight it is at is very MAXIMUM EARNING POTENTIAL!

Longer they wait and they more they keep winning...EVERYBODY PRICE INVOLVED GOES UP! Which explains why Eddie now has this ridiculous ultimatum of "Sign To Fight Before The Fury Fight"

[N/A]

The champ makes almost 12x more.

How could you possibly know that?

[jglvz256]

Congratulations to AJ. What he's accomplished thus far in his career is very impressive and I consider him the #1 heavyweight in the world. Klitschko was a big test early in his career and he passed the test. However, it was an old rusty Klitschko coming off a loss, a long layoff, and no tune ups. Still very ballsy for fight #19, but a calculated risk that paid off.

Wilder challenged himself when he fought Stiverne, who was #2 in the world at the time according to many leading experts (ESPN, Ring, etc, not that I personally recognize Ring).

Yes, he didn't have a signature DEFENSE of the title until King Kong, but you can't blame Wilder for Povetkin cheating twice.

Your argument seems to be that AJ was moved faster. Cong****. Yes he was. So? Doesn't change the fact that the smart business move was for Wilder to want AJ in 2017 or 2018, while the smart business move for AJ was to Want Wilder in 2019 or 2020.

No my argument is that you were talking nonsense. You claimed that "Joshua's handlers have conveniently avoided the biggest punchers in the division". Can you name some of these terrifying killers that Joshua has avoided?

[Sid-Knee]

Thank you for your opinion.

Stiverne and Ortiz were both considered top 3 fighters by the world's leading experts when Wilder beat them. AJ has never fought a consensus top 3 fighter.

AJ is a great fighter, I have him ranked #1 at heavyweight for a reason. But his handlers have conveniently avoided the biggest punchers in the division. As they should. Wilder went out of his way to target Ortiz, just to challenge and prove himself. That should be applauded.

What did Ortiz and Stiverne do to be top 3 fighters? Your reply will be comical.

[Sid-Knee]

60/40 over here and the winner gets 60/40 over in the states ...thats how it should be done.

No fighter makes contracts where the winner gets the bigger cut. Ever.

[Sid-Knee]

Come on man, Joshua fought Klitschko in his 19th fight - his 19th fight! Wilder didn't "challenge himself" by fighting Ortiz until after 40 fights and 3 years of being champion. How can you keep calling yourself neutral and unbiased when you keep writing this stuff!

That clown is paid by Haymon to spread propaganda on here. Just laugh at him and his painfully desperate ways.

[Sid-Knee]

Thurman is 10x more popular than this Deontay character.
Do you think Mayweather, the PPV king, would offer Keith $15 mil?
Don't know why this Deontay guy's fans defend him like he's some Pacquaio or someone.
He's basically a nobody to me.

/

He's a nobody to Americans as well. Not many of them want to buy tickets to his **** fights. He's never had a sell out in his life.

But Americans are the biggest clowns on the planet so you have to expect this kind of deranged delusion. The hypocrites were defending Floyd and Canelo in their fights with Manny and Golovkin and the flat fee, but here they are contradicting themselves. That's all they ever do. Freaks, that's what they are.

[Fanofreason]

60-40 with 60 going to the winner.

[Sid-Knee]

That road runs in 2 directions, despite what you are claiming. There is no other fight out there right now for Joshua that will pay him what 60% of the Joshua/Wilder fight would.

And no fight offered Floyd more money than taking 40% in both fights against Conor and Manny. But did he take the 40%? No, he took most of the money in both fights. Would Americans make this argument for Floyd only getting 40% in both fights? No, hell would freeze over before that would happen.

Wilder will make more money than his talent and resume is worth with 30%. He won't make anywhere near to that kind of money anywhere else. So do you agree with that argument like you're doing with Joshua?

[The plunger man]

No fighter makes contracts where the winner gets the bigger cut. Ever.

Come again sid ? So the champion who ever wins the 1st fight don't get the bigger share in the rematch ? Even though they own all the belts ? Are you sure lol