How does the IBF sanction Spence/Ocampo but not GGG/Vanes?

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Illmatic94
    Undisputed Champion
    • Oct 2015
    • 3955
    • 235
    • 14
    • 32,550

    #31
    Originally posted by BufordTannen
    That’s the opening line. I know for a fact Rubio fight ended up at -11000 and others like wade and Monroe

    Doesn’t change the fact that op is making a ******ed comparison lol
    What is so ******ed about it?

    Vanes didn't belong in a ring with Golovkin and Ocampo doesn't belong in a ring with Spence. the odds prove it. their experience proves it. that's all I'm saying.

    I know he's the mandatory I'm just speaking strictly from a competitive standpoint.

    Comment

    • Larry the boss
      EDUCATED
      Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
      • Jan 2011
      • 90798
      • 6,419
      • 4,473
      • 2,500,480

      #32
      Originally posted by Drama Show
      what you facepalming for you clown. vanes has fought at a FAR higher level than ocampos. many thought he beat charlo, and he dropped andrade in a split decision and gave lara a hard fight. you guys are embarassing trying to demote him to a fighter of the level of ocampos, who has literally fought noone. theres hundreds of bums who have competed at the same weight for 2 years, since when was that justification for someone being a good opponent.
      Vanes best win is????

      Comment

      • Larry the boss
        EDUCATED
        Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
        • Jan 2011
        • 90798
        • 6,419
        • 4,473
        • 2,500,480

        #33
        Originally posted by Drama Show
        who cares if he had 0 fights at 160, its 6 pounds diffeernce ffs, thats nothing. do you suddenly forget about everything else if someone moves up a few pounds? he was never an elite fighter but he gave charlo, lara and andrade (who he dropped) tough fights. quit making out hes some scrub cause ggg beat him, grow up man.
        He was 3-3 in his last 6, lost his last fight and hadnt fought in 2 years

        Comment

        • Nay_Sayer
          Banned
          Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
          • Nov 2011
          • 3837
          • 182
          • 1
          • 49,922

          #34
          Originally posted by larryxxx..
          Vanes best win is????
          I'll ask an even better question;

          Vanes' best win in the last two years???

          Comment

          • GhostofDempsey
            Undisputed Champion
            Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
            • Mar 2017
            • 31791
            • 13,180
            • 8,710
            • 493,602

            #35
            You have to know how this works by now, the guzzlers will hate on GGG no matter what and make excuses for certain fighters based upon demographics. You are correct, both fights are garbage, and for some reason celebrate mismatches so long as a PBC fighter is the favorite.

            Comment

            • R_Walken
              Undisputed Champion
              Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
              • Dec 2012
              • 5932
              • 340
              • 789
              • 57,069

              #36
              Originally posted by BufordTannen
              And he was ggs easiest knockout since wade lol. IT was a disgusting mismatch yet you defend it to death. Get his balls out your mouth

              The best thing you can say about vanes is he dropped Andrade 5 years ago lmao
              What’s the best thing you can say about Ocampos ?

              Comment

              • satiev1
                Undisputed Champion
                Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                • Nov 2015
                • 4661
                • 575
                • 0
                • 78,492

                #37
                Originally posted by larryxxx..
                He was 3-3 in his last 6, lost his last fight and hadnt fought in 2 years
                And yet he is still levels above ocampo. Sad isn't.

                Comment

                • R_Walken
                  Undisputed Champion
                  Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                  • Dec 2012
                  • 5932
                  • 340
                  • 789
                  • 57,069

                  #38
                  Originally posted by larryxxx..
                  He was 3-3 in his last 6, lost his last fight and hadnt fought in 2 years
                  Fighting top end talent

                  You and I know if Vanes fought the 150-1200 ranked fighters he’d be sh.it kicking them

                  How’d Ocampos do against any of the top 10 WWs

                  Comment

                  • Raggamuffin
                    Undisputed Champion
                    Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                    • Aug 2016
                    • 8210
                    • 457
                    • 966
                    • 43,263

                    #39
                    Originally posted by WBC WBA IBF
                    What is the hypocrisy?

                    Ocampo is #1 at welterweight and therefore getting a title shot.

                    Vanes was unranked and therefore ineligible for a title shot.
                    I don't care about Vanes. Canelo ****en that up and GG cleaned up the mess. The IBF should have never stripped GG-now say that they should've.

                    Second, Ocampo has not fought one live body and you know it...nor has he earned his ranking. Foh with your lunacy. The same goes for Derevyanchenko.

                    When you give credence to these two that their rankings knowing that they are almost downright felonious...it makes me want to smack fire out you guys ass for agreeing with this ****. Foh...

                    Comment

                    • HanzGruber
                      STRAPMEUP
                      Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                      • Dec 2011
                      • 29824
                      • 1,069
                      • 238
                      • 81,632

                      #40
                      Originally posted by Illmatic94
                      What is so ******ed about it?

                      Vanes didn't belong in a ring with Golovkin and Ocampo doesn't belong in a ring with Spence. the odds prove it. their experience proves it. that's all I'm saying.

                      I know he's the mandatory I'm just speaking strictly from a competitive standpoint.
                      Cause ibf (mostly) follows their rules. Vanes wasn’t ranked and hadn’t fought in 2 years. Hadn’t won in 3 so letting it be a title fight made no sense

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP