How does the IBF sanction Spence/Ocampo but not GGG/Vanes?

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Illmatic94
    Undisputed Champion
    • Oct 2015
    • 3955
    • 235
    • 14
    • 32,550

    #1

    How does the IBF sanction Spence/Ocampo but not GGG/Vanes?

    I'm confused now.

    Ocampo a damn 100/1 underdog. Vanes was 30/1 when I checked on May 2nd.

    Meaning Ocampo winning will be the biggest upset in boxing history. Finally eclipsing Tyson/Douglass.

    and this mofo is a mandatory. How?

    the IBF gotta explain this. I supported the stripping because Vanes had no damn business in that ring. but neither does Ocampo.
  • HanzGruber
    STRAPMEUP
    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
    • Dec 2011
    • 29824
    • 1,069
    • 238
    • 81,632

    #2
    Lol ocampo would not be the biggest upset in boxing. He opened up at like -5000 most of ggs opponents were -10000

    Comment

    • bigjavi973
      Undisputed Champion
      Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
      • Oct 2013
      • 24007
      • 759
      • 1,480
      • 1,236,071

      #3
      Originally posted by Illmatic94
      I'm confused now.

      Ocampo a damn 100/1 underdog. Vanes was 30/1 when I checked on May 2nd.

      Meaning Ocampo winning will be the biggest upset in boxing history. Finally eclipsing Tyson/Douglass.

      and this mofo is a mandatory. How?

      the IBF gotta explain this. I supported the stripping because Vanes had no damn business in that ring. but neither does Ocampo.


      ocampo has been competing at welterweight and didnt have a layoff of almost 2 years

      vanes never fought about 154 lbs and was almost off for 2 years

      Comment

      • j0zef
        Undisputed Champion
        Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
        • Oct 2015
        • 8440
        • 645
        • 767
        • 45,501

        #4
        Originally posted by BufordTannen
        Lol ocampo would not be the biggest upset in boxing. He opened up at like -5000 most of ggs opponents were -10000

        Comment

        • N/A
          Undisputed Champion
          Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
          • Jul 2017
          • 9269
          • 214
          • 0
          • 12

          #5
          Originally posted by Illmatic94
          I'm confused now.
          What are you confused about? Ocampo is the IBF mandatory. Vanes wasn't ranked by the IBF and therefore ineligible to fight for the title. It's very simple.

          Comment

          • Raggamuffin
            Undisputed Champion
            Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
            • Aug 2016
            • 8210
            • 457
            • 966
            • 43,263

            #6
            Originally posted by Illmatic94
            I'm confused now.

            Ocampo a damn 100/1 underdog. Vanes was 30/1 when I checked on May 2nd.

            Meaning Ocampo winning will be the biggest upset in boxing history. Finally eclipsing Tyson/Douglass.

            and this mofo is a mandatory. How?

            the IBF gotta explain this. I supported the stripping because Vanes had no damn business in that ring. but neither does Ocampo.
            Now you see the hypocrisy in the IBF and GGs fans lmao...

            Comment

            • Larry the boss
              EDUCATED
              Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
              • Jan 2011
              • 90798
              • 6,419
              • 4,473
              • 2,500,480

              #7
              Vanes had 0 fights at 160, lost his last fight, was 3-3 in his last 6 and hadnt fought in 2 years

              Comment

              • HanzGruber
                STRAPMEUP
                Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                • Dec 2011
                • 29824
                • 1,069
                • 238
                • 81,632

                #8
                That’s the opening line. I know for a fact Rubio fight ended up at -11000 and others like wade and Monroe

                Doesn’t change the fact that op is making a ******ed comparison lol

                Comment

                • N/A
                  Undisputed Champion
                  Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                  • Jul 2017
                  • 9269
                  • 214
                  • 0
                  • 12

                  #9
                  Originally posted by Raggamuffin
                  Now you see the hypocrisy in the IBF and GGs fans lmao...
                  What is the hypocrisy?

                  Ocampo is #1 at welterweight and therefore getting a title shot.

                  Vanes was unranked and therefore ineligible for a title shot.

                  Comment

                  • Motorcity Cobra
                    Banned
                    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                    • Mar 2016
                    • 32565
                    • 1,106
                    • 545
                    • 963,610

                    #10
                    Originally posted by bigjavi973


                    ocampo has been competing at welterweight and didnt have a layoff of almost 2 years

                    vanes never fought about 154 lbs and was almost off for 2 years
                    He admitted he's confused.

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    TOP