How does the IBF sanction Spence/Ocampo but not GGG/Vanes?

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • HanzGruber
    STRAPMEUP
    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
    • Dec 2011
    • 29824
    • 1,069
    • 238
    • 81,632

    #41
    Originally posted by R_Walken
    What’s the best thing you can say about Ocampos ?
    You don’t see me praising him like it’s a good fight like the dumb ass drama show does. It’s just a mandatory

    Comment

    • Eff Pandas
      Banned
      Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
      • Apr 2012
      • 52129
      • 3,624
      • 2,147
      • 1,635,919

      #42
      D- troll post, but A+ sig pic.

      Comment

      • Eff Pandas
        Banned
        Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
        • Apr 2012
        • 52129
        • 3,624
        • 2,147
        • 1,635,919

        #43
        Originally posted by R_Walken
        What’s the best thing you can say about Ocampos ?
        He beat Jorge Paez Jr & he has above average eyebrows that I bet the ladies love.

        Comment

        • WallabeeKing
          Undisputed Champion
          Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
          • Nov 2015
          • 1024
          • 55
          • 42
          • 72,609

          #44
          Originally posted by stealthradon
          According to that site Ricky Burns vs Njecag is a -10000 - +1600 fight.
          That's what the odds are for that fight...everywhere.

          Comment

          • R_Walken
            Undisputed Champion
            Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
            • Dec 2012
            • 5932
            • 340
            • 789
            • 57,069

            #45
            Originally posted by BufordTannen
            You don’t see me praising him like it’s a good fight like the dumb ass drama show does. It’s just a mandatory
            I’m not saying you think it’s a good fight , everyone knows it isn’t but Spence /Ocampos isn’t getting nearly the criticism GGg/Wade or GGg/Vanes recieved yet their all the same batch of doo-doo

            And yeah it’s a Mando which will probably end up like GGg/Wade or Brook / No hope Dan

            And while GGg/Vanes was a sh.it fight And just a stay busy fight at least you can say Vanes fought the best in his division and was always competitive l. What’s the best thing you can say about Ocampos probably what Eff Pandas mentioned he has great eyebrows because you sure can’t give him props for anything he’s done in the ring so far

            Credit to Ocampos for taking the fight and his handlers gaming the system so they can get a cheque l. But he deserves a World Title fight less then Vanes even with a layoff and jumping up in weight

            Comment

            • HanzGruber
              STRAPMEUP
              Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
              • Dec 2011
              • 29824
              • 1,069
              • 238
              • 81,632

              #46
              Originally posted by R_Walken
              I’m not saying you think it’s a good fight , everyone knows it isn’t but Spence /Ocampos isn’t getting nearly the criticism GGg/Wade or GGg/Vanes recieved yet their all the same batch of doo-doo

              And yeah it’s a Mando which will probably end up like GGg/Wade or Brook / No hope Dan

              And while GGg/Vanes was a sh.it fight And just a stay busy fight at least you can say Vanes fought the best in his division and was always competitive l. What’s the best thing you can say about Ocampos probably what Eff Pandas mentioned he has great eyebrows because you sure can’t give him props for anything he’s done in the ring so far

              Credit to Ocampos for taking the fight and his handlers gaming the system so they can get a cheque l. But he deserves a World Title fight less then Vanes even with a layoff and jumping up in weight
              He does not deserve it less than vanes lol. He actually fights in the division he’s fighting the title for. And has won a fight in the last 3 years.

              He was supposed to fight ponomarov to determine mandatory but he ducked ocampo twice

              Comment

              • R_Walken
                Undisputed Champion
                Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                • Dec 2012
                • 5932
                • 340
                • 789
                • 57,069

                #47
                Originally posted by BufordTannen
                He does not deserve it less than vanes lol. He actually fights in the division he’s fighting the title for. And has won a fight in the last 3 years.

                He was supposed to fight ponomarov to determine mandatory but he ducked ocampo twice
                Actually Yeah he does

                Vanes last fight was 2 years ago against the best in his division in Lara

                Ocampos competition level since Vanes lost to Lara has

                a guy who’s ranked 430 who’s lost 4 of his last 5
                Another fighter who’s lost 4 of his last 5
                Oh sh.it another fighter who’s lost 4 of his last 5
                The 253rd ranked guy who lost 2 of his last 3
                A guy who’s lost 3 of his last 6
                A guy ranked 205 th
                And Paez Jr in the middle of his 3-7-1 run

                And almost all the losses were against other scrubs or fringe contenders

                That’s sh.it absolutely horrible , the highest ranked guys 148 and almost all are on losing streaks

                But yeah the guy who fought and only lost to the best in his division and beat actual contenders and former champs deserves a title shot less then the guy who run has been glorified janitors

                F.uck off Bud

                Comment

                • Redd Foxx
                  Hittin' the heavy bag.
                  Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                  • Dec 2011
                  • 22007
                  • 1,180
                  • 2,316
                  • 1,257,197

                  #48
                  You usually post good stuff but kinda went off the rails here. They don't sanction based on odds. Ocampo is ACTIVE, in the same weight class, undefeated, and in no way a similar situation to Vanes.
                  I didn't even complain about Vanes, and I admit I don't find Ocampo to be a compelling opponent. But, I'm not seeing the comparison here or sanctioning issues.

                  Comment

                  • Chuckguy
                    Undisputed Champion
                    Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
                    • Jun 2008
                    • 13927
                    • 345
                    • 183
                    • 58,389

                    #49
                    Originally posted by larryxxx..
                    Vanes had 0 fights at 160, lost his last fight, was 3-3 in his last 6 and hadnt fought in 2 years
                    So how did the WBC sanction the fraud Connor fight when Connor NEVER fought in the ring and wasn’t ranked by the WBC? Just curious larry or was the fight not sanctioned which I really doubt

                    Comment

                    • Phenom
                      Phenomdeaux
                      Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
                      • May 2010
                      • 12218
                      • 494
                      • 363
                      • 101,474

                      #50
                      Originally posted by Chuckguy
                      So how did the WBC sanction the fraud Connor fight when Connor NEVER fought in the ring and wasn’t ranked by the WBC? Just curious larry or was the fight not sanctioned which I really doubt
                      It wasn't sanctioned by the wbc it was non title fight there is no such thing as the money belt

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP