-
-
Your the undisputed dummy, that’s all you are. Your argument doesn’t make sense; it’s a theory job made up in your little dumb ass mind. GGG “on record” not what you “think” has held a title in the middleweight division since he won the 1st won in 2010. And he has successfully defended at least one title continuously up until now his 20th title defense. No one gives a damn what you think of how he got there. The only thing that matters is what is on paper as fact and record. And you can make that silly argument for a bunch of boxers over the last few decades. That’s why you sound ******ed which you probably are-LOL!!!Comment
-
1. Is that the fighters fault whether the titles they are chasing are held by a champion or are vacant? 2. What do you mean by lower titles? 3. Are you speaking of charlo as the mando? You really think that the magnitude of that fight should be signed and agreed to within a month since the canelo fight fell out? You should know better than that. 4. Who are these middle weight movers or spoilers you speak of? Who are the middle weights that ggg avoided because they moved around alot? 5. I will acknowledge he's benefitted from a weak era, much like klitchko did but that's not their fault. Hopkins had a weak defense record for yrs until tito stepped up. Before tito, none of Hopkins opponents at the time were considered to be far above what lemieux was. If you really think that the reason why ggg vs cotto or lemieux didn't happen is GGG's fault then you're just biased. As far as ward, ggg definitely didn't want that fight.Comment
-
The WBA titles go.
1.Super
2.Regular
3.Interim
The super is the recognised champion, if there's no super then it's the regular. Sturm was the super champ while Golovkin was the regular. So Sturm was the WBA champion not Golovkin.
Use your little brain.
Boxing fans cry about too many titles, but then want to have 2 or 3 for each org when it suits them.
Comment
-
The record means very little. It isn’t as if any of these guys would likely beat prime Hagler, so who cares how much fodder these fellows cut through?Comment
-
Dumb Ass, GGG still had some version of a middleweight title since 2010. It doesn’t matter which one is more recognized than the other. How do you sound? You just made my argument with your little brain and nonsense. You should delete your post, you sound regarded trying to justify YOUR “brainless” theory. If your the super or regular champion or interim, you still have a middleweight title little d... s....!!! LOL!!!The WBA titles go.
1.Super
2.Regular
3.Interim
The super is the recognised champion, if there's no super then it's the regular. Sturm was the super champ while Golovkin was the regular. So Sturm was the WBA champion not Golovkin.
Use your little brain.
Boxing fans cry about too many titles, but then want to have 2 or 3 for each org when it suits them.Comment
-
Boxing fans cry about too many titles, but support an org altering their rules to introduce a new "super" title and having 2 world titles instead of one - when it suits them.The WBA titles go.
1.Super
2.Regular
3.Interim
The super is the recognised champion, if there's no super then it's the regular. Sturm was the super champ while Golovkin was the regular. So Sturm was the WBA champion not Golovkin.
Use your little brain.
Boxing fans cry about too many titles, but then want to have 2 or 3 for each org when it suits them.
Golovkin was No1 contender for the universally recognised WBA title for 2 years. And he won the interim title, which entitled him to a shot at the universally recognised WBA world title.
But instead of giving him the shot he earned, the WBA changed their rules, conjoured a new "super" title out of nowhere, and told GGG he was now the "regular" champion.
It later came out that they had been bribed to do that by Felix Sturm and his promoter.
Imagine the outcry there would have been here if the WBA had created a new super duper title, and had GGG fight Daniel Geale for it, instead of telling him to defend his super title against Jacobs!Comment
-
Boxing fans cry about too many titles, but support an org altering their rules to introduce a new "super" title and having 2 world titles instead of one - when it suits them.The WBA titles go.
1.Super
2.Regular
3.Interim
The super is the recognised champion, if there's no super then it's the regular. Sturm was the super champ while Golovkin was the regular. So Sturm was the WBA champion not Golovkin.
Use your little brain.
Boxing fans cry about too many titles, but then want to have 2 or 3 for each org when it suits them.
Golovkin was No1 contender for the universally recognised WBA title for 2 years. And he won the interim title, which entitled him to a shot at the universally recognised WBA world title.
But instead of giving him the shot he earned, the WBA changed their rules, conjoured a new "super" title out of nowhere, and told GGG he was now the "regular" champion, and had no right to fight for the super title.
It later came out that they had been bribed to do that by Felix Sturm and his promoter.
Imagine the outcry there would have been here if the WBA had created a new super duper title, and had GGG fight Spike O'Sullivan for it, instead of telling him to defend his super title against Jacobs!Comment
Tweet
Comment