Is Mayweather the GOAT 154 lbs and under fighter?

[mcdonalds]

Because I know you've been banned and are using a different IP address now. Can't fool me.

Mr fraud, that is just not true. I don't even know how to change my IP

Contact the mods ASAP and lets go

[chrisJS]

Took me a year??? I went and picked my kids up from school... and I know every damn fighter you listed... I been following boxing for over 25 damn years...

I asked it you yesterday multiple times.

25 years? You'd think you'd know more and wouldn't be such a fanboy since that means your older than 25.

[chrisJS]

Mr fraud, that is just not true. I don't even know how to change my IP

Contact the mods ASAP and lets go

LOL, because it's from a different device. It's really simple, alt.

Can't even name 50 fighters pre 1996 without cheating lol but at least you admit it.

[boliodogs]

I agree with Hearns, I think Robinson is to wide with his punches IMO...Naples was to slow IMO to beat Floyd and he kept his hands to low at times..Duran would have been interesting

You might be right. It's hard to say because they have no common opponents. Robinson did indeed throw wide punches but they were very fast and hard. I saw most of Napoles's prime fights and he had very fast accurate combinations. I saw him knock down middleweights when sparring at the main street gym in LA. In one fight he dropped a guy and hit him with 3 more punches before he hit the ground. I saw him win every round from a still prime Emile Griffith. He never fought a guy as fast and clever as Mayweather so maybe Mayweather would have defeated him. Many people don't know that Napoles was never a full welterweight. He was rated number 1 at 130 and then at 135 and the champions of those weights ducked him. The welterweights fought him so he became the champ at that weight. He usually weighed in at about 142 pounds for his early title welterweight fights back in the same day weigh in days.

[mcdonalds]

I asked it you yesterday multiple times.

25 years? You'd think you'd know more and wouldn't be such a fanboy since that means your older than 25.

Says the Old man who has a fit anytime someone criticizes someone like Lomachenko or GGG

Youre the real fanboy and a FRAUD

[IronDanHamza]

I wanted to see if he'd answer that and not my other question because it's easier to answer that question and I was correct in my assumption.

You asked him multiple times he answered and got it right.

To question him after is weak. Don't ask him a question then mock him for answering that's just dumb.

[chrisJS]

Says the Old man who has a fit anytime someone criticizes someone like Lomachenko or GGG

Youre the real fanboy and a FRAUD

Odd. I'm not even a GGG fan. I'm 32. Not that old but twice your age I'm assuming.

[GMAN SUPREME]

That is just a popular opinion and not some written in stone unarguable fact. If someone thinks another boxer or boxers were better PFP than Robinson nobody can prove them wrong. Robinson lost 19 fights and he wasn't old and past prime for all of those losses. An unranked boxer named Tiger Jones badly beat Robinson when Robinson was 32 years old. Robinson never rematched him. Before that Randy Turpin beat Robinson. Robinson beat Turpin in a rematch but that doesn't make the first loss go away.Robinson had draws in his prime as a welterweight and a draw is not a win. Robinson was great but hardly unbeatable. The old timers declared Robinson the best PFP about 70 years ago and some think that can't ever be questioned. It can be questioned by any boxing fan who thinks for themselves and makes their own decisions on such matters. Lots of great boxers have come along since Robinson retired so long ago. It's not sacrilegious or illegal to say one or more of them might have been better PFP.

I think for my self and I say srr is the best! No I'm not an old timer. I've seen his fights and read up on ray robinson a ton. look at the list of opponents he beat at welterweight and middleweight seriously go look. he lost so what? many great boxers have come along but they haven't surpassed the original sugar ray! no modern fighter cracks my top ten all time greats list.

[chrisJS]

You asked him multiple times he answered and got it right.

To question him after is weak. Don't ask him a question then mock him for answering that's just dumb.

It took him a day to answer it. Roughly 24 hours.

[mcdonalds]

LOL, because it's from a different device. It's really simple, alt.

Can't even name 50 fighters pre 1996 without cheating lol but at least you admit it.

Mr fraud, we all know you don't know **** about most of the fighters you named. Its painfully obvious

I've only posted on here from 3 devices ever, so contact the mods and some internet Geek should also be able to confirm.

Don't be scared and take the bet