GGG's Legacy

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • chrisJS
    Undisputed Champion
    Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
    • Mar 2007
    • 8989
    • 331
    • 64
    • 78,477

    #201
    [QUOTE=Xi_;18115211]
    Originally posted by chrisJS
    Duran wasn't on that level when he fought Hagler.....he was shopworn and fat! Hatton was the better win.....im done arguing because you're to argue a point i don't even give **** about. I jist have one question for you.....Do you agree that Hagler never fought atg in their prime?
    Hearns was prime but the weight class above his prime.

    Yeah, I'm over it too because you think Hatton is better than the Duran who beat Moore, Barkley, Cuevas. There's no getting through to that.

    Comment

    • Xi_
      Undisputed Champion
      Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
      • Nov 2013
      • 3957
      • 194
      • 6
      • 13,179

      #202
      [QUOTE=chrisJS;18115219]
      Originally posted by Xi_
      Hearns was prime but the weight class above his prime.

      Yeah, I'm over it too because you think Hatton is better than the Duran who beat Moore, Barkley, Cuevas. There's no getting through to that.

      Comment

      • chrisJS
        Undisputed Champion
        Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
        • Mar 2007
        • 8989
        • 331
        • 64
        • 78,477

        #203
        [QUOTE=Xi_;18115218]
        Originally posted by chrisJS
        here we go with the ring rating lmao.....the ring is only credible when we talk about the old fighters huh?
        Where do I mention Ring here?

        Also please note that the ring had a much better rep in the 1980's but again I didn't cite them in this point. But since you brought them up Tommy Hearns was 1984 ring magazine fighter of the year before his 1985 match with Hagler - in the toughest era in boxing post-SRR.

        Comment

        • Xi_
          Undisputed Champion
          Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
          • Nov 2013
          • 3957
          • 194
          • 6
          • 13,179

          #204
          [QUOTE=chrisJS;18115224]
          Originally posted by Xi_
          Where do I mention Ring here?

          Also please note that the ring had a much better rep in the 1980's but again I didn't cite them in this point. But since you brought them up Tommy Hearns was 1984 ring magazine fighter of the year before his 1985 match with Hagler - in the toughest era in boxing post-SRR.
          Floyd's opponents were universally ranked as well......im using the same criteria y'all use with floyd......deal with it.

          Comment

          • chrisJS
            Undisputed Champion
            Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
            • Mar 2007
            • 8989
            • 331
            • 64
            • 78,477

            #205
            [QUOTE=Xi_;18115236]
            Originally posted by chrisJS
            Floyd's opponents were universally ranked as well......im using the same criteria y'all use with floyd......deal with it.
            Sure, but history and what they accomplished after the lists showed that they didn't stack up to Duran and especially Hearns. None close.

            Comment

            • Xi_
              Undisputed Champion
              Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
              • Nov 2013
              • 3957
              • 194
              • 6
              • 13,179

              #206
              [QUOTE=chrisJS;18115260]
              Originally posted by Xi_
              Sure, but history and what they accomplished after the lists showed that they didn't stack up to Duran and especially Hearns. None close.
              Dont care....its not even my point. Hagler didnt fight a prime atg.

              Comment

              • IronDanHamza
                BoxingScene Icon
                Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                • Oct 2009
                • 49445
                • 5,022
                • 269
                • 104,043

                #207
                Originally posted by djtmal
                go on youtube and watch shane vs. forrest 2x, shane vs winky 2x, shane vs. cotto, shane vs. vargas 2x its actually documented how shopworn shane was...
                Well yet again that is more of an opinion.

                Shane being #3 P4P in 2010 is literally a documented fact.

                It seems the term "fact" is clearly elluding you.
                Last edited by IronDanHamza; 10-05-2017, 06:22 PM.

                Comment

                • IronDanHamza
                  BoxingScene Icon
                  Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                  • Oct 2009
                  • 49445
                  • 5,022
                  • 269
                  • 104,043

                  #208
                  Originally posted by chrisJS
                  I just have fun with it. I mean they criticize a fighter for moving into a division which wasn't even invented and say the fighters ducked other fights who's names they don't know and speak on fights they haven't seen. They even pretend 1984 happened before 1983 for example to suit their agendas. It's a fanboy thing I guess.
                  But then on the flipside of the coin you tried to claim that Pernell Whitaker was on the P4P list when he fought Trinidad.

                  So you've provided your share of laughs yourself with your incorrect statments.

                  Comment

                  • chrisJS
                    Undisputed Champion
                    Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                    • Mar 2007
                    • 8989
                    • 331
                    • 64
                    • 78,477

                    #209
                    Originally posted by IronDanHamza
                    But then on the flipside of the coin you tried to claim that Pernell Whitaker was on the P4P list when he fought Trinidad.

                    So you've provided your share of laughs yourself with your incorrect statments.
                    I saw him on lists right around that time. I think he was dropped because he failed a test for pot but nothing in the ring. He was inactive by 17 months vs. Mosley's 16 months and did have a fight scheduled for October 1998 which got cancelled. He was ranked #4 by Ring Magazine in the February 1999 issue.

                    So much different than creating a lie that Hagler only decided to fight Duran after Hearns KO'd him.

                    Comment

                    • IronDanHamza
                      BoxingScene Icon
                      Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                      • Oct 2009
                      • 49445
                      • 5,022
                      • 269
                      • 104,043

                      #210
                      Originally posted by chrisJS
                      I saw him on lists right around that time. I think he was dropped because he failed a test for pot but nothing in the ring. He was inactive by 17 months vs. Mosley's 16 months and did have a fight scheduled for October 1998 which got cancelled. He was ranked #4 by Ring Magazine in the February 1999 issue.

                      So much different than creating a lie that Hagler only decided to fight Duran after Hearns KO'd him.
                      No you didn't and no he was not ranked #4 in February of 1999.

                      He was not ranked on the P4P list in 1999.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP