GGG's Legacy

[jas]

hall of famer even if he loses to canelo in rematch

and floyd will never come back to fight ggg

[chrisJS]

No you didn't and no he was not ranked #4 in February of 1999.

He was not ranked on the P4P list in 1999.

Yes I did and yes he was. I used to get Ring from the mid 90s until way into the 2000's.

He was eliminated for 12 months inactive in October of 1998 which was the March issue. Here's the ranking as of May 1998 (again he fought October 1997)
http://boxrec.com/media/index.php/Th..._Ratings:_1997

[The Big Dunn]

Not true. Really, judging by Mosley's career post Vernon Forrest he was never all that good again. That was 2002.

I knew Floyd would beat Mosley who was way past it despite you trying to spin that he was in his prime.

Also, not sure what Barrera and Morales have to do with it but yes both were much better than Mosley in general and closer to their primes when they were engaging in the JMM-Pac-MAB-Morales round robin. I can't stand Pac or his fans but I do find it funny how Floyd fanboys say Mosley, Cotto, De La Hoya, Marquez were all prime and legit weight classes but Morales, Barrera, Cotto, Marquez were not when Marquez fought them. Marquez beat Pacquaio 4 times I think that's the thing Floyd fans are right on but I think that's more for their agenda than what they scored the fights.

Where did I post or imply any of these guys were prime? Your personal opinion noted, it would be dishonest for you to post that the overwhelming opinion on NSB was Floyd was scared of Shane and that Shane would beat him.

[djtmal]

[QUOTE=Xi_;18115092]

Wars tally up and on any given night you can look like crap. Duran was NOT prime when hagler fought him, he was a fat lw fighting at mw and floyd has multiple wins better than that duran win.

stevie wonder can see that your only option here is to downplay duran and hearns so floyd looks better

how ****** you sound really...

you trying to compare a win over one of the greatest boxer/punchers on all time, to some shopworn hof's at best and some paper champs...

give it up already..

[djtmal]

Well yet again that is more of an opinion.

Shane being #3 P4P in 2010 is literally a documented fact.

It seems the term "fact" is clearly elluding you.

i could care less about a floyd boy's "facts", when i can look at a guy and tell where he's at in his career...

[IronDanHamza]

Yes I did and yes he was. I used to get Ring from the mid 90s until way into the 2000's.

He was eliminated for 12 months inactive in October of 1998 which was the March issue. Here's the ranking as of May 1998 (again he fought October 1997)
http://boxrec.com/media/index.php/Th..._Ratings:_1997

Ok that's May of 1998.

In 1999 when he fought Trinidad he was not ranked on the P4P list.

[IronDanHamza]

i could care less about a floyd boy's "facts", when i can look at a guy and tell where he's at in his career...

Well that's neither here nor there whether you care or not.

Again just merely stating the fact.

[just the facts]

hall of famer even if he loses to canelo in rematch

and floyd will never come back to fight ggg

A guy (ggg) with two fights vs quality opposition, one he struggled like hell to get a decision (Jacobs) and the other was a draw (Canelo) is a HOFer? Really? I guess Barry McGuigen is in so anything is possible.

[Metho_4u]

Golovkin's legacy is simply ok, he's not a great fighter 2 decent fighters and all the rest were C or C+ at best

[Metho_4u]

hall of famer even if he loses to canelo in rematch

and floyd will never come back to fight ggg

He's not coming back to fight anyone moron, why would Floyd have to go up yet another 6 lbs to fight a no name to prove anything, when he's proven his greatness? Just always have kept moving from one guy to the next that Floyd supposedly couldn't beat huh? That's funny and pathetic at the same time.