GGGS Resume is better than Canelos

[just the facts]

Ever since canelo lost to mayweather the only real tough challenger he faced in his prime was lara which I though he lost. He had no intention of unifying his division like a true champ would do facing andrade and charlo. GBP wanted no part of a 154 lb unification with the other champs and Instead he faced an old cotto, kirkland, anuglo, and khan. GGG's wins against lemieux and jacobs surpasses any win canelo has.

Lemeieux and jacobs > trout lara and cotto.

Nowhere in this post is there even one rational or factual statement. Everyone who took the time to read this post is now dumber for having done so.

[just the facts]

Of course his resume is better than Conela's..
Conela ducked GGG so he lost to him....

Actually, only thing WORSE than losing....
IS DUCKING THE FIGHT.

Ducking is a detriment to the sport of boxing and only aids it's demise. Fighting people (win or lose) does not.

I would have continued to be a CONela fan if he didn't duck (not hard to be a fan with his beautiful style). I have very little tolerance for people who drop a world title to avoid a fight though.

P.S. I don't wanna hear 15 mil bullcrap.... he had a world title (most prestigious wbc title) and gave it away without ANY negotiation. Fact.

So by this logic, Ward beat g string?

[Scary]

Canelo has a better resume. The simple fact that people know the folkes he beat, before they met, is much more than GGG can say (besides Kell Brook).

[Rock&Roll]

So by this logic, Ward beat g string?

Oi lad, u have picked the WORST user name possible. I have read many of your posts and it does not suit you at all (in fact, you're boarderline ignore list).

Now, to your answer.
YES!!!! IF Golovkin dropped a world title to avoid Ward, then yes.

If Golovkin drops any world title belts to avoid any fighter, he is a ducking pu55y.

Get it? I hate ducking fighters, not fighters of certain groups, nationalities, races or religions.

Now f#@k off.

[The Big Dunn]

I think satiev1 is Russian for Spoon23.

[icha]

Ever since canelo lost to mayweather the only real tough challenger he faced in his prime was lara which I though he lost. He had no intention of unifying his division like a true champ would do facing andrade and charlo. GBP wanted no part of a 154 lb unification with the other champs and Instead he faced an old cotto, kirkland, anuglo, and khan. GGG's wins against lemieux and jacobs surpasses any win canelo has.

Lemeieux and jacobs > trout lara and cotto.

Just make a poll to see how dumb your thread is....
If you dont want to make it fine, there is already one and is not even close.

https://www.boxingscene.com/forums/showthread.php?t=656586

[Metho_4u]

Simple, no he doesn't. Thread over.

[TonyGe]

size does not =talent and that does not equate to a quality fighter man..every time Lemiuex has stepped up in class he has been dominated..he has not beaten any current world champs period..BOXING IS ALL ABOUT WHO HAVE YOU DEFEATED!!! WHO THE **** HAS LEMEUEX DEFEATED WORTH A DAMN?

If Lemieux ever got in a fight with Cotto he would end Cotto's career. I would be seriously concerned that Cotto would end up hospitalized. Lemieux is much too big for him and hits too hard. There is no way Cotto would get in a ring with Lemieux.

[TonyGe]

Canelo has a better resume. The simple fact that people know the folkes he beat, before they met, is much more than GGG can say (besides Kell Brook).

They also know the people he lost to. Margarito, Mayweather, Pacquiao (a much smaller fighter) Trout, Alvarez. I always thought Cotto was overrated.

[boliodogs]

I love both boxers and I think they both have great resumes. I think GGG has the better resume.