Better resume: Canelo or Golovkin?

**Dirk Diggler UK** · 10-21-2014, 05:41 PM

Obviously Canelo.

Not even thread worthy

**Build That Wall** · 10-21-2014, 05:42 PM

Golovkins Resume would be better if the Competition wasn't ducking him. Right now, Canelos is better.

**VAGAB0ND** · 10-21-2014, 05:46 PM

People constantly s**t on Canelo for his wins over Lara and Trout, which many of you think he lost.

And people constantly s**t on Golovkin for destroying Top 10 contenders, or as most of you like to call them, "bums".

For a lot of you, it comes down to who is the lesser of two evils. Canelo or Golovkin?

**Larry the boss** · 10-21-2014, 05:50 PM

Canelo easily...why even make this thread?

**VAGAB0ND** · 10-21-2014, 05:51 PM

Originally posted by BrushMyHair

Golovkins Resume would be better if the Competition wasn't ducking him. Right now, Canelos is better.

True, but many people consider Canelo's biggest wins draws or even losses, whereas Golovkin is slaughtering his opponents.

Canelo gets s**t on for being in close fights and Golovkin gets s**t on for knocking out opponents early. I don't get it.

**LacedUp** · 10-21-2014, 05:52 PM

Canelo and it's not even up for debate.

**HanzGruber** · 10-21-2014, 05:54 PM

Originally posted by Dirk Diggler UK

Obviously Canelo.

Not even thread worthy

This. This thread is about as useless as "who's faster khan or Devon"

**therealpugilist** · 10-21-2014, 05:55 PM

Its not close....Canelo has fought and beat better fighters than GGG

WORLD Champions/ titlists he has faced and contenders/former contenders ...Floyd Mayweather, Erislandy Lara, Carlos Baldomir, Cintron, Angulo, Ryan Rhodes, Lovemore Ndou, Shane Mosley, Austin Trout, and Miguel Vazquez, Kermit Cintron....with one official loss

GGG on the other hand just Kassim Ouma, Rubio, Proska, Daniel Geale, Macklin, and Stevens

People **** on Canelo for winning close decisions but at least he has been facing stiff competition and has been back to back recently

**Dirk Diggler UK** · 10-21-2014, 05:55 PM

Originally posted by VAGAB0ND

True, but many people consider Canelo's biggest wins draws or even losses, whereas Golovkin is slaughtering his opponents.

Canelo gets s**t on for being in close fights and Golovkin gets s**t on for knocking out opponents early. I don't get it.

Why would people be ****ting on them? Golovkin does what he's supposed to do. It's just a fact that most of his opponents are overmatched and quite poor.

I thought Canelo beat Trout quite comfortably and the Lara fight I had a draw I think. Some people may not agree with the decisions but does that equate to "****ting on" him?

Better resume: Canelo or Golovkin?