GGGS Resume is better than Canelos

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Larry the boss
    EDUCATED
    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
    • Jan 2011
    • 90798
    • 6,419
    • 4,473
    • 2,500,480

    #11
    Originally posted by satiev1
    Lol why are you so defensive? I make a post stating facts and you start pmsing like a little *****. Go get a tampon.
    how are you stating facts?? nothing you posted was a fact at all..i have no idea why ya'll wanna act like Lemiuex is some great fighter..he literally has beaten no one worth a damn

    Comment

    • satiev1
      Undisputed Champion
      Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
      • Nov 2015
      • 4661
      • 575
      • 0
      • 78,492

      #12
      Originally posted by larryxxx.
      Better is defined by accomplishments man..Cotto is a hall of fame fighter who was the lineal champ at 160..Jacobs was a good win but seriously list his resume..you are doing to much for no reason at all
      I just told that lemeiux would beat the version of cotto that alvarez fought. I don't care what cotto did at 135 and 140. Beating an undersized past prime cotto dosen't make it more impressive. At mw he gets battered by jacobs and lemeuix. So does lara. Lara was losing on the scorecards against a 154 lber in angulo. Lemeuix would beat him. Too small to handle those two. Therefore ggg better resume than canelo.

      Comment

      • Mukuro
        Undisputed Champion
        Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
        • Jun 2015
        • 1935
        • 143
        • 72
        • 9,402

        #13
        I think the quality of the resumes are not as far apart as some people think. It is fair to challenge that.

        I think Jacobs and Lemiuex are better wins than a lot of GGG detractors want to admit.

        Canelo's standout wins are Lara, Cotto, and Trout. They all present more difficult styles than Lemieux, but I think Jacobs is more dangerous than any of them at middleweight. I'm not trying to pump him up, I'm not a GGG fanboy. I just legit think Jacobs is a real guy. Lemieux is one dimensional, but fast and powerful. He can't be handled any better than GGG did. You can't really contest these points.

        Against their other opponents, there isn't much difference in quality, and GGG generally looked more impressive against the non elite guys.

        I give Canelo the nod when it comes to opposition, but it isn't by a wide margin anymore.

        Comment

        • satiev1
          Undisputed Champion
          Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
          • Nov 2015
          • 4661
          • 575
          • 0
          • 78,492

          #14
          Originally posted by Mukuro
          I think the quality of the resumes are not as far apart as some people think. It is fair to challenge that.

          I think Jacobs and Lemiuex are better wins than a lot of GGG detractors want to admit.

          Canelo's standout wins are Lara, Cotto, and Trout. They all present more difficult styles than Lemieux, but I think Jacobs is more dangerous than any of them at middleweight. I'm not trying to pump him up, I'm not a GGG fanboy. I just legit think Jacobs is a real guy. Lemieux is one dimensional, but fast and powerful. He can't be handled any better than GGG did. You can't really contest these points.

          Against their other opponents, there isn't much difference in quality, and GGG generally looked more impressive against the non elite guys.

          I give Canelo the nod when it comes to opposition, but it isn't by a wide margin anymore.
          Lemieux is close to 180 lbs in the ring. I don't see how a 155 lb cotto beats him. Lara went hell with angulo who dosen't have the skills of lemieux and was losing on the scorecards and dropped twice. I can't see lara having enough power and volume to keep lemeiux off of him.

          Comment

          • Sledgeweather17
            Undisputed Champion
            Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
            • Jun 2015
            • 3587
            • 154
            • 5
            • 34,855

            #15
            Originally posted by satiev1
            Ever since canelo lost to mayweather the only real tough challenger he faced in his prime was lara which I though he lost. He had no intention of unifying his division like a true champ would do facing andrade and charlo. GBP wanted no part of a 154 lb unification with the other champs and Instead he faced an old cotto, kirkland, anuglo, and khan. GGG's wins against lemieux and jacobs surpasses any win canelo has.

            Lemeieux and jacobs > trout lara and cotto.
            Except GGG lost to Jacobs and you must be sniffing cow dung if you think Lemule is better than....practically anyone decent fighter.

            Comment

            • Larry the boss
              EDUCATED
              Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
              • Jan 2011
              • 90798
              • 6,419
              • 4,473
              • 2,500,480

              #16
              He did try to unify..WITH MAYWEATHER!!!..after he lost to Floyd what title did he have to unify??? please tell me

              Comment

              • Larry the boss
                EDUCATED
                Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                • Jan 2011
                • 90798
                • 6,419
                • 4,473
                • 2,500,480

                #17
                Originally posted by satiev1
                I just told that lemeiux would beat the version of cotto that alvarez fought. I don't care what cotto did at 135 and 140. Beating an undersized past prime cotto dosen't make it more impressive. At mw he gets battered by jacobs and lemeuix. So does lara. Lara was losing on the scorecards against a 154 lber in angulo. Lemeuix would beat him. Too small to handle those two. Therefore ggg better resume than canelo.
                based on what???

                Comment

                • Larry the boss
                  EDUCATED
                  Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                  • Jan 2011
                  • 90798
                  • 6,419
                  • 4,473
                  • 2,500,480

                  #18
                  Originally posted by satiev1
                  Lemieux is close to 180 lbs in the ring. I don't see how a 155 lb cotto beats him. Lara went hell with angulo who dosen't have the skills of lemieux and was losing on the scorecards and dropped twice. I can't see lara having enough power and volume to keep lemeiux off of him.
                  **** does that mean??

                  Comment

                  • Mukuro
                    Undisputed Champion
                    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                    • Jun 2015
                    • 1935
                    • 143
                    • 72
                    • 9,402

                    #19
                    Originally posted by satiev1
                    Lemieux is close to 180 lbs in the ring. I don't see how a 155 lb cotto beats him. Lara went hell with angulo who dosen't have the skills of lemieux and was losing on the scorecards and dropped twice. I can't see lara having enough power and volume to keep lemeiux off of him.
                    To be honest, I don't really disagree. Lemieux is one dimensional and lacking any elite wins, but he would stack up well against those guys head to head, and size does matter unless this is some kind of p4p nonsense.

                    Comment

                    • satiev1
                      Undisputed Champion
                      Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                      • Nov 2015
                      • 4661
                      • 575
                      • 0
                      • 78,492

                      #20
                      Originally posted by larryxxx.
                      **** does that mean??
                      Size and power matter dumbass. That's why their are weight classes. You're very dense. I stated my points. You need to read more than just the first sentence.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP