Comments Thread For: No Robbery at MSG, But Golovkin's Future Plans are Criminal

[Shadoww702]

I've just gave you a list of names that had Jacobs winning/very close fight, that's not my words it's theirs. You're saying racist media have it close, i'm asking you are these very popular writers/experts racist media?

Almost no one in the UK gave the win to GGG. I was suprised at how almost all said Jacobs was robber and Gonzalez wasnt??

Almost everyone I read/heard had Jacobs and Rungvisai winning by 2 rounds if not more??? I had it 115-112 for GGG. But some of those rounds were VERY close. AND I counted 2 rounds thay Jacobs gave to GGG by not listening to his corner. Who had a BRILLIANT game plan.

[M Bison]

As i thought. Deflection. You know you're ******ed.

If Jacobs was landing so much, and he clearly won and It was a robbery then explain why was GGG face nearly unscathed?
GGG was beating him the majority of the rounds, classic bias from butthurt haters.

[hitking]

And GGG is the one who isn't taking risks?

Come on man. Unless Jacobs is having problems making 160 there is no reason for him to move up. He can make a lot of money at 160 fighting quality guys. And as the guys at 154 move up its going to be a even more exciting division. Hell, since he's a PBC fighter a lot of those fights should be really easy to make.

You said it yourself. The only name that does anything for Danny at 160 is GGG. The only other fights that have any degree of solid risk/reward would be Canelo and Saunders (if its for the belt.) Canelo, for obvious reasons, and it will never happened. Saunders would only make sense if he took that belt that GGG wants so much.

[hitking]

so then it was "fan demand" that gave us Floyd vs Baldomir? The WBC belt had nothing to do with it?

interesting.......

Baldomir was the lineal champ. He had to fight him according to your logic. The same way GGG needed a crippled in Martinez. And the jr middleweights that have followed him as lineal champ.

[OnePunch]

Baldomir was the lineal champ. He had to fight him according to your logic. The same way GGG needed a crippled in Martinez. And the jr middleweights that have followed him as lineal champ.

im not the one saying "belts dont matter", YOU are.

I'm the one saying they DO matter......

[Bjl12]

Lol Jacobs outboxed him for 7 rounds? You high? Look at what the punch stats show. Golovkin outpunched/outlanded him in 9 out of 12 rounds with 1 round even. He also controlled the fight with his jab by outjabbing him in every round, sometimes significantly. And I know you're r3tarded put GGGs jabs are anything but "pitter-patter". His jabs are like most fighters power punches which is why Jacobs was forced to wear shades in the post fight conference to cover up two black eyes!

If anybody was throwing pitter-patter punches it was your homegirl Jacobs. GGG blocked the vast majority of his weak shots and the ones that landed on the "dome piece" didn't trouble GGG once which is why he marched forward all night and left the fight without a scratch on his face. So much for Jacobs having a 90% KO ratio which should've been magnified by his 20lbs weight advantage lol. Jacobs did land more power punches (18 in total) but his connect percentage was significantly lower (39% to GGG 49%). As you know, HBO stats for decades show the fighter who lands half his power shots always wins the fight which is exactly what happened.

Listen up Spoon23.

Jacobs was like 5-7lbs bigger than lil G. He weighed in at 176 w/ HBO after lil G weighed in at 170 IN THE MORNING. So lil G added a couple more pounds by fight time. They were the same size...please stop whining.

The g-tards didn't cry when Lil G drug up WWs to fight at 160? So please don't cry about weight since lil g can't meet Ward at 168 (after calling him out) and can't meet Canelo at 154 (after calling him out). At a certain point lil g will actually have to fight a GOOD fighter and win. He lost to Jacobs on my card but Jacobs is B level.

Maybe lil g will sign a contract eventually and after he loses you pacFUC.KS will say he was old. It honestly cracks me up lol

[hitking]

Questions for GGG apologists. I see y'all throwing a hypothetical June fight with Saunders and a hypothetical Sept date with Canelo out there. Let's say hypothetically neither one of those happen. And seeing how negotiations with either fighter have ever gotten anywhere close to actual fights being made. I think it's a solid chance neither fight happens this year. If they don't, a Jacobs rematch is pretty much a must this year, right?

[SUBZER0ED]

Golovkin clearly won the Jacobs fight. He has always said that he wants to unify the MW division & it appears that he intends to do just that by fighting Saunders. So, is he supposed to give Jacobs an immediate rematch because Fitz's choice of the winner Saturday night differs from that of the three judges?

[Briandl]

Definitely. Who else is there? But as long as the Jacobs fight took to make, who knows how long a rematch might take.

Who else is there, Charlo?

[hitking]

im not the one saying "belts dont matter", YOU are.

I'm the one saying they DO matter......

That can't matter too much. Because Floyd was criticized for fighting reigning champions, some in unification fights.