Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Comments Thread For: P. Fury: Tyson Will Return in April/May, We Want Deontay Wilder

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #41
    Originally posted by Motorcity Cobra View Post
    So Tyson is done serving his UKAD suspension. They never sued UKAD. They bowed out and served the suspension
    That's utter rubbish. Tyson Fury's boxing licence was suspended by the BBBoC after a doctor declared him unfit to compete due to mental health issues. Once his doctor clears him health wise, and assuming his admitted use of cocaine while fucked in the head is not classed as PED abuse, he should be cleared to fight again.

    The UKAD charge is a separate issue. UKAD suspended Tyson and Hughie's licences back in October and were then ordered to lift their suspension by a judge after Peter Fury took them to court. The UKAD case was due to be heard by a tribunal last month. So what happened there?

    One thing for sure, if Tyson and Hughie had been suspended for nandrolone abuse in Nov, they would be out for a lot longer than a month, and they would be keeping quiet and hoping the world forgets about them till the susupensions are spent, which would be at least a year down the line, imo.

    Comment


    • #42
      Originally posted by Motorcity Cobra View Post
      So Tyson is done serving his UKAD suspension. They never sued UKAD. They bowed out and served the suspension
      Originally posted by micky1971 View Post
      lets put this to bed right here and now, The ***** isnt the best "fat fooker" at anything.
      there are so many people on here with very short memories following a klitchko bad night at the office.
      haye would obliterate this bell end within 3 rounds.
      wilder would ko the bum.
      tony joshua connects and its game over in one shot.
      I actually think del boy chisora is a good match up because of the way each of these people behave.
      Originally posted by Slowhand View Post
      Was there an official ruling yet? Looks like they are just hoping for everybody to forget about the whole PED thing.
      Originally posted by kafkod View Post
      That's utter rubbish. Tyson Fury's boxing licence was suspended by the BBBoC after a doctor declared him unfit to compete due to mental health issues. Once his doctor clears him health wise, and assuming his admitted use of cocaine while fucked in the head is not classed as PED abuse, he should be cleared to fight again.

      The UKAD charge is a separate issue. UKAD suspended Tyson and Hughie's licences back in October and were then ordered to lift their suspension by a judge after Peter Fury took them to court. The UKAD case was due to be heard by a tribunal last month. So what happened there?

      One thing for sure, if Tyson and Hughie had been suspended for nandrolone abuse in Nov, they would be out for a lot longer than a month, and they would be keeping quiet and hoping the world forgets about them till the susupensions are spent, which would be at least a year down the line, imo.
      The Furys have never directly disputed the nandrolone accusations as far as I'm aware, and it's completely messed up that they first tested positive before the Klitschko fight.

      Whether it's a legitimate test or not, UKAD's actions have been completely unprofessional. The results and process should be public. None of this behind-closed-doors stuff.

      Comment


      • #43
        Originally posted by keith_head View Post
        The Furys have never directly disputed the nandrolone accusations as far as I'm aware, and it's completely messed up that they first tested positive before the Klitschko fight.

        Whether it's a legitimate test or not, UKAD's actions have been completely unprofessional. The results and process should be public. None of this behind-closed-doors stuff.
        WTF? If the Furys hadn't denied using nandrolone the case would never have been scheduled to be heard by a legal tribunal and Peter Fury would never have obtained a high court ruling which ordered the BBBoC to lift their suspension of Tyson and Hughie's boxing licences after the allegation was first made.

        Hughie Fury never says much in public, but Tyson and Peter Fury have both vehemently denied the nandrolone accusation many times.

        Imo, the reason we heard nothing about the case being heard in court last month is that UKAD withdrew the allegation to avoid being sued and the Furys can't say anything about it for legal reasons.

        Given that Tyson and Hughie are both talking about fighting early next year, that's the only explanation that makes any sense to me.

        Comment


        • #44
          Fury would seriously beat Wilder easily

          Comment


          • #45
            Originally posted by LacedUp View Post
            Fury would seriously beat Wilder easily
            Based on what? An ugly decision over a gun shy Wlad? Just as likely Wilder lands a big punch Fury can't handle and puts his lights out.

            I've said it before, the first quality heavyweight Fury fights that can punch and is fighting an aggressive fight KOs him. Big John Tate waiting to happen.

            Comment


            • #46
              Originally posted by Mike Dyson View Post

              Comment


              • #47

                Comment


                • #48
                  Originally posted by just the facts View Post
                  Based on what? An ugly decision over a gun shy Wlad? Just as likely Wilder lands a big punch Fury can't handle and puts his lights out.

                  I've said it before, the first quality heavyweight Fury fights that can punch and is fighting an aggressive fight KOs him. Big John Tate waiting to happen.
                  Wlad didn't win one solid round in that fight. Wladimir Klitschko, world champion for 10 years straight.

                  Wilder was losing rounds and getting outboxed by Spzilka. haha

                  Add to that he's absolutely crap.

                  Comment


                  • #49
                    Why is that match made? Fury quit on his belts, why does he get a chance at the champ without contending first? If there's money brought to Wilder's table then it's to be considered but other than that Fury is someone who needs to reapply as a contender.


                    Make him fight the other contenders to "EARN" his position. No gifts to that quitter!

                    Ray

                    Comment


                    • #50
                      Originally posted by LacedUp View Post
                      Wlad didn't win one solid round in that fight. Wladimir Klitschko, world champion for 10 years straight.

                      Wilder was losing rounds and getting outboxed by Spzilka. haha

                      Add to that he's absolutely crap.
                      You were the first one I remember posting that Fury would beat Wlad, he did and easily. So all credit to you and Fury. That being said, let's not pretend it was some monumental effort on Furys part. It was a dull plodding fight by any account. Fury just did more than Wlad did on that night, that's not saying much.

                      Wilder is faster, more coordinated and more powerful than Fury is. Throw in Furys weak chin, add in that Fury doesn't have power or pure boxing skills to protect that chin for all twelve rounds and there you go. As noted Fury is Big John Tate waiting to happen.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP