Originally posted by BrushMyHair
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Is Cotto Overrated?
Collapse
-
Originally posted by Beater_of_ass View PostHe also lost to Chad Dawson and Joe Calzaghe, so they lost the same amount of times and I think Cotto's losses were "better" considering they were against ATG's. Joe isn't that and Dawson isn't even in the top 50 of his era.Last edited by Build That Wall; 02-18-2015, 10:50 PM.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Beater_of_ass View PostHe also lost to Chad Dawson and Joe Calzaghe, so they lost the same amount of times and I think Cotto's losses were "better" considering they were against ATG's. Joe isn't that and Dawson isn't even in the top 50 of his era.
Comment
-
Depends on what you see as overrated, I personally don't think he is. Not many who would beat him from 54-60.
Comment
-
Originally posted by El-blanco View PostThis is exactly what I'm talking about, a terrible argument made by a delusional fan. Hopkins was beating kelly Pavlik around the ring when cotto was getting his brain scrambled by margarito and PAC. He was beating jean pascal while cotto was losing to Austin trout. How are they not of the same era?
Pavlik win isn't particularly special in hindsight. And what has Pascal done since the Hopkins loss, other than become a soon to be plank against Kovalev.
Comment
-
Originally posted by El Angel View PostHe started fighting 13 years before Cotto turned pro. Is De La Hoya of Cotto's era? Roy Jones Jr.? Tito Trinidad? What do you define eras by?
Pavlik win isn't particularly special in hindsight. And what has Pascal done since the Hopkins loss, other than become a soon to be plank against Kovalev.
Comment
Comment