Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Is Cotto Overrated?

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #41
    Originally posted by BrushMyHair View Post
    ^^^^^^This
    It's ridiculous man. Look at their fights from 2004-07, they both has huge fights in that time. These guys make no sense and have zero objectivity.

    Comment


    • #42
      Originally posted by Wizardsh View Post
      Which really isn't that great
      It was a great win, what are you talking about? You're obviously a newcomer into boxing, Mosley 8 years ago was a P4P top 10 fighter.

      Comment


      • #43
        Originally posted by Beater_of_ass View Post
        He also lost to Chad Dawson and Joe Calzaghe, so they lost the same amount of times and I think Cotto's losses were "better" considering they were against ATG's. Joe isn't that and Dawson isn't even in the top 50 of his era.
        I don't consider Calzahge a loss because Hopkins got robbed.
        Last edited by Build That Wall; 02-18-2015, 10:50 PM.

        Comment


        • #44
          Originally posted by Beater_of_ass View Post
          He also lost to Chad Dawson and Joe Calzaghe, so they lost the same amount of times and I think Cotto's losses were "better" considering they were against ATG's. Joe isn't that and Dawson isn't even in the top 50 of his era.
          I referenced those fights as proof that they're of the same era, I'm not speaking of who was better at that time.

          Comment


          • #45
            Depends on what you see as overrated, I personally don't think he is. Not many who would beat him from 54-60.

            Comment


            • #46
              Originally posted by El-blanco View Post
              This is exactly what I'm talking about, a terrible argument made by a delusional fan. Hopkins was beating kelly Pavlik around the ring when cotto was getting his brain scrambled by margarito and PAC. He was beating jean pascal while cotto was losing to Austin trout. How are they not of the same era?
              He started fighting 13 years before Cotto turned pro. Is De La Hoya of Cotto's era? Roy Jones Jr.? Tito Trinidad? What do you define eras by?

              Pavlik win isn't particularly special in hindsight. And what has Pascal done since the Hopkins loss, other than become a soon to be plank against Kovalev.

              Comment


              • #47
                Originally posted by BrushMyHair View Post
                ^^^^^^This
                Could make your own argument instead of just piggybacking off his.

                Comment


                • #48
                  Not overrated but not leaving a great mark to the end of a HOF career with his respect to the MW title as of late.

                  Comment


                  • #49
                    Originally posted by El Angel View Post
                    He started fighting 13 years before Cotto turned pro. Is De La Hoya of Cotto's era? Roy Jones Jr.? Tito Trinidad? What do you define eras by?

                    Pavlik win isn't particularly special in hindsight. And what has Pascal done since the Hopkins loss, other than become a soon to be plank against Kovalev.
                    Yes but his best fights, win or lose, are at the same time frame as cottos. Do you not see how utterly ridiculous what you're saying is? It's ok to be wrong, the world won't end.

                    Comment


                    • #50
                      Originally posted by BrushMyHair View Post
                      I don't consider Calzahge a loss because Hopkins got robbed.
                      Oh, so Floyd didn't actually beat Castillo then, you're coming around.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP