Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Comments Thread For: Argenis Mendez' Team To Appeal Barthelemy KO Outcome

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Originally posted by CubanGuyNYC View Post
    Oh, look, there's the dreaded baby bottle. I guess I've lost this argument....

    You're comparing the mindset in sparring to the mindset in a championship fight? I'll bet you hear the cheer of the crowd in your head as you and your BFF work on your drills.
    Yeah thats technology, might want to use it sometime

    you lost the argument a few pages back kid, nice circlejerk doe/

    Comment


    • Originally posted by ElMeroChingon View Post
      Yeah thats technology, might want to use it sometime

      you lost the argument a few pages back kid, nice circlejerk doe/
      You complaining about a hit the bell lol your avatar puts cement in his gloves! lol

      Comment


      • No DQ. At worst a NC with mandatory rematch.

        He didn't hear the bell. It happens all the time.

        Remember Guerrero vs Berto? They practically broke the bell ringing that ****. Didn't stop the Ghost at all.

        Comment


        • Originally posted by CubanGuyNYC View Post
          Am I? Happens all the time. People go to trial over real-life mistakes on a regular basis. Then the jury decides whether they acted reasonably or not. You see, mistakes are part of the human condition. The courts recognize that. That's one of the main differences between criminal and civil liability.
          So then Rances is guilty and loses no? Are we basing it on tort law, specifically negligence? Or is the outcome of the fight what is going to trial? Is it the referee? Your post confused me a little, but I'll be the first to admit I'm not a lawyer.

          Comment


          • Originally posted by RA-Box View Post
            No DQ. At worst a NC with mandatory rematch.

            He didn't hear the bell. It happens all the time.

            Remember Guerrero vs Berto? They practically broke the bell ringing that ****. Didn't stop the Ghost at all.
            Yes, yes and yes. Good post.

            I welcome a rematch. Remove all doubt. Is there any, really? I'd bet the house on Barthelemy now that I've seen the match-up in action.

            Comment


            • Originally posted by BarnBurnerBrawl View Post
              You complaining about a hit the bell lol your avatar puts cement in his gloves! lol
              The guy in your avatar "BIT someone's ear off", barth should've choked him on the ground, after all he was going through "emotions".
              lol

              Comment


              • Originally posted by RA-Box View Post
                No DQ. At worst a NC with mandatory rematch.

                He didn't hear the bell. It happens all the time.

                Remember Guerrero vs Berto? They practically broke the bell ringing that ****. Didn't stop the Ghost at all.
                Sounds like an unbiased opinion ... Thank you

                Comment


                • Originally posted by UL1210 View Post
                  So then Rances is guilty and loses no? Are we basing it on tort law, specifically negligence? Or is the outcome of the fight what is going to trial? Is it the referee? Your post confused me a little, but I'll be the first to admit I'm not a lawyer.
                  I'm not a lawyer either. My post wasn't meant to be taken literally. It was meant as an example. The point was that mistakes happen, it's then up to a judging body to decide the severity of the transgression and rule upon it. Sometimes there's a heavy penalty. Sometimes there's a relatively light penalty. Sometimes there's no penalty at all. We're obviously at odds as to what actually transpired, and, therefore, what the penalty should be.

                  Comment


                  • Originally posted by ElMeroChingon View Post
                    The guy in your avatar "BIT someone's ear off", barth should've choked him on the ground, after all he was going through "emotions".
                    lol
                    In Tyson's words" F*** it it's a fight ! "

                    Difference being your guy went into the ring with intentions to cheat! Premeditated
                    Last edited by BarnBurnerBrawl; 01-04-2014, 03:38 AM.

                    Comment


                    • Originally posted by CubanGuyNYC View Post
                      Yes, yes and yes. Good post.

                      I welcome a rematch. Remove all doubt. Is there any, really? I'd bet the house on Barthelemy now that I've seen the match-up in action.
                      Oh yeah, Mendez better hope they just deny him anything involving a rematch, so he can move onto fights he has chance at winning.

                      That was a brutal beatdown given to him with ease.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP