Comments Thread For: Argenis Mendez' Team To Appeal Barthelemy KO Outcome
Collapse
-
-
Comment
-
So then Rances is guilty and loses no? Are we basing it on tort law, specifically negligence? Or is the outcome of the fight what is going to trial? Is it the referee? Your post confused me a little, but I'll be the first to admit I'm not a lawyer.Am I? Happens all the time. People go to trial over real-life mistakes on a regular basis. Then the jury decides whether they acted reasonably or not. You see, mistakes are part of the human condition. The courts recognize that. That's one of the main differences between criminal and civil liability.Comment
-
Yes, yes and yes. Good post.
I welcome a rematch. Remove all doubt. Is there any, really? I'd bet the house on Barthelemy now that I've seen the match-up in action.Comment
-
Comment
-
Comment
-
I'm not a lawyer either. My post wasn't meant to be taken literally. It was meant as an example. The point was that mistakes happen, it's then up to a judging body to decide the severity of the transgression and rule upon it. Sometimes there's a heavy penalty. Sometimes there's a relatively light penalty. Sometimes there's no penalty at all. We're obviously at odds as to what actually transpired, and, therefore, what the penalty should be.Comment
-
-
Oh yeah, Mendez better hope they just deny him anything involving a rematch, so he can move onto fights he has chance at winning.
That was a brutal beatdown given to him with ease.Comment


Comment