Vitali's legacy
Collapse
-
Haha... you mean like Silvester Stallone? I see your point though. Well, I guess it depends on the term "great". Great compared to what? I know when people say that they mean against all fighters since the dawn of boxing. But my late gramps (who had been following boxing since the 30s) said that there was never a great champion that people didn't say came up during a weak division. He told me to forget about that nonsense and that its only a tool to discredit a fighter you simply don't like. People claimed Dempsey had no real competition and fought middleweights, that Patterson came up during a soft period, etc. He even said people were saying "Besides Norton and Frazier, there's no one for Ali to fight". Even you and I are old enought to remember that same song and dance about Tyson. They said Tyson was only so great because the HW division was soft.
Vitali and Wladimir would hold their own in the ring against any HW that's ever laced up. They might not win... they might lose terribly, but fom Sullivan to Lewis... they'd know they were in a fight.Comment
-
why are white people from Europe hating on vitali because hes not black and from America. explain please.
they all said hes pretty good. Why do you think its pathetic that they say hes pretty good.? explain please.It's obvious when people are coming out of the woodwork to discredit Vitali like this. It's pathetic really.Comment
-
Comment
-
Ah I see, as usual, you both dodged my question.Please don't use this forum as your fustration dumping ground. Here have I a very good suggestion for you : http://health.usnews.com/doctors/psychiatrists
Comment
-
Comment
-
That very well may be true, but how can you determine greatness on a question mark and just give a pass for fights not made?Simple, I don't think Vitali would have lost a fight during those retirement years. Lewis was getting beaten by Vitali, and everyone since has been utterly outclassed. If an ATG like Lewis was losing to him, nobody after that aside from his brother, who he will never fight, stood a chance.
This means most likely, he wouldn't have lost a fight since the Lewis fight.
And being up on the scorecards means nothing. In the end Lewis won by stoppage because he was the more durable fighter who landed the more effective punches.Comment
-
You gotta love the whole "he was up on the scorecards!" argument that seems to be employed almost exclusively by Vitali's ball washers. Don't get me wrong, I have the utmost respect for both Vitali and Wlad, but that argument (if you can even call it that) is utterly absurd.That very well may be true, but how can you determine greatness on a question mark and just give a pass for fights not made?
And being up on the scorecards means nothing. In the end Lewis won by stoppage because he was the more durable fighter who landed the more effective punches.
It's like saying that Christopher Reeve was totally dominating that equestrian competition until the horse broke his fucking neck.Comment
-
Lmao!! You're the rudest, funnist mother****er on this site! But you're 100% right.You gotta love the whole "he was up on the scorecards!" argument that seems to be employed almost exclusively by Vitali's ball washers. Don't get me wrong, I have the utmost respect for both Vitali and Wlad, but that argument (if you can even call it that) is utterly absurd.
It's like saying that Christopher Reeve was totally dominating that equestrian competition until the horse broke his fucking neck.Comment

Comment