Would you favour any Heavyweight in the history of boxing to beat Prime Ali?

[Mr. Invincible]

Journeyman from 1965-1975 = Top-10 "Contender" today. Saying someone's a "Top-10 Contender" in today's Heavyweight division is like saying someone's the smartest spastic in the Special Ed class

Based on what? A dimwit's opinion? No thanks.

[-Deal With It-]

Shut up you hating moron. Write back when you have something worth saying. Keep faulting Vitali for beating top ten guys with 1-2 losses on their records while you praise Ali for beating the Wepners of the world.

Difference being, Wepner is a mere footnote in Ali's career. I would say he has maybe 20 greater wins at least, than Wepner in his career. Where as, Vitali beating a Chuck Wepner caliber boxer is considered a career defining win for him.

Wepner was certainly more proven at Heavyweight than Adamek was, a guy who is arguably Vitali's best win to date. That's how stark the difference is between Ali's resume and Vitali's, my good sir.

Comparing Ali to a glass hearted fraud like Vitali, goes beyond the bounds of being laughable, i seriously question the mental fitness of the chap that chooses to make such an outrageous assertion.

[Jim Jeffries]

Seems weird not to have Ken Norton in the poll.

[Superflo777]

So the guy in your avatar is a regular journeyman in those times?

Hey moron, notice I said "victims". And one controversial L on your record doesn't mean you don't belong to the ATG. And I'm still disappointed about LL for not giving Vitali the rematch he deserved.

[Mr. Invincible]

Not bad money for 30 seconds worth of work Quick Draw

I didn't say how much I paid. It wasn't a lot and I asked for a refund afterwards.

[Mr. Invincible]

That's the great misconception that arises when overglorifying the "past times". The truth is, regular journeymen and contenders that were beat up by the past champs are NO different to the victims on Klitschko's resume today.

Right, and the contenders today are often a lot bigger than they were in those times.

[F l i c k e r]

Hey moron, notice I said "victims". And one controversial L on your record doesn't mean you don't belong to the ATG. And I'm still disappointed about LL for not giving Vitali the rematch he deserved.

Well your the one who said his entire resume and Lennox is on his resume even if Lennox whooped his ass.

So, might want to make your thoughts clearer next time, or don't troll as hard.

[ScrotieMcBooger]

I didn't say how much I paid. It wasn't a lot

Oh, you must have paid by the inch then

[JAB5239]

Right, and the contenders today are often a lot bigger than they were in those times.

And less skilled with less stamina.

[Superflo777]

Well your the one who said his entire resume and Lennox is on his resume even if Lennox whooped his ass.

That's not the whole story and you know it, but what do I care. Haters will always pick out the the half story and leave out the other part that doesn't fit their hating and flaming. Klit haters like you will discredit Vitali's domination and success facts, saying "facts don't mean anything" but when it comes to LL vs. VK suddenly all that matters is "Lennox TKO 6 - FACT", and the rest of the story is unimportant. Go back to your dream world where Lennox "whooped Vitali's ass in 6 rds", I'm out for today.